Cited by 146Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Rethinking brief interventions for alcohol in general practice

Open access
McCambridge, Jim, Saitz, Richard·2017·BMJ

Abstract

Jim McCambridge and Richard Saitz question the effectiveness of brief advice and counselling in primary care to prevent harm from heavy alcohol use and call for a more strategic approach

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.j116

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brief intervention (BI) is an evidence-based measure for alcohol problems.

    “One such evidence based measure is brief intervention (BI) for alcohol problems”

    From Brief interventions for alcohol use disorders in low- and middle-income countries: barriers and potential solutions (2022) · cites this paper as [24]

    The introduction says evidence suggests brief interventions can be effective for alcohol use. But the section ‘Evidence of effectiveness evidence is weak’ says that effectiveness inferences are not secure and that reported reductions in alcohol-related problems were based on self-reported consumption instead. The source therefore supports an evidence base for brief interventions, but not the unqualified claim that they are an evidence-based measure for alcohol problems. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • BIs for alcohol use disorders have been extensively researched over the last four decades, with a large body of evidence indicating their efficacy in primary care and emergency care.

    “BIs for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) have been extensively researched over the last four decades [20, 23, 24], with a large body of evidence indicating their efficacy in primary care and emergency care.”

    From Brief interventions for alcohol use disorders in low- and middle-income countries: barriers and potential solutions (2022) · cites this paper as [24]

    The “Evidence of effectiveness evidence is weak” section describes a substantial body of brief-intervention trials and reports a review finding reduced drinking in primary-care populations. But the authors distinguish trial efficacy from real-world effectiveness, note that recent large general-practice trials found no benefit, and do not establish efficacy for people with alcohol use disorders in both primary and emergency care. The claim presents the evidence more broadly and confidently than this paper does. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [1]1. Babor TF, Ritson EB, Hodgson RJ. Alcohol-related problems in the primary health care setting: a review of early intervention strategies. Br J Addict 1986;356:23-46. doi:10.1111/ j.1360-0443.1986.tb00291.x pmid:3457598.
  2. [4]4. Nilsen P, Bendtsen P, McCambridge J, Karlsson N, Dalal K. When is it appropriate to address patients' alcohol consumption in health care-national survey of views of the general population in Sweden. Addict Behav 2012;356:1211-6. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh. 2012.05.024 pmid:22749342. · DOI
  3. [5]5. Quirk A, MacNeil V, Dhital R, Whittlesea C, Norman I, McCambridge J. Qualitative process study of community pharmacist brief alcohol intervention effectiveness trial: can research participation effects explain a null finding?Drug Alcohol Depend 2016;356:36-41. doi:10. 1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.01.023 pmid:26875673.
  4. [23]23. Moyer A, Finney JW, Swearingen CE, Vergun P. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. Addiction 2002;356:279-92. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443. 2002.00018.x pmid:11964101. · DOI
  5. [25]25. Bradley KA, Lapham GT. Is it time for a more ambitious research agenda for decreasing alcohol-related harm among young adults?Addiction 2016;356:1531-2. doi:10.1111/add. 13235 pmid:26948421. · DOI
  6. [26]26. Jonas DE, Garbutt JC, Amick HR, et al. Behavioral counseling after screening for alcohol misuse in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2012;356:645-54. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-9- 201211060-00544 pmid:23007881. · DOI
  7. [27]27. Kwok CF, Ho LT. Look Action for Health in Diabetes trial: What we have learned in terms of real world practice and clinical trials. J Diabetes Investig 2014;356:637-8. doi:10.1111/ jdi.12231 pmid:25422762.
  8. [32]32. Jaehne A, Loessl B, Frick K, Berner M, Hulse G, Balmford J. The efficacy of stepped care models involving psychosocial treatment of alcohol use disorders and nicotine dependence: a systematic review of the literature. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2012;356:41-51. doi:10.2174/ 1874473711205010041 pmid:22280331. For personal use only: See rights and reprints http://www.bmj.com/permissions Subscribe: http://www.bmj.com/subscribe
  9. [33]33. Randell E, Pickles T, Simpson SA, et al. Eligibility for interventions, co-occurrence and risk factors for unhealthy behaviours in patients consulting for routine primary care: results from the Pre-Empt study. BMC Fam Pract 2015;356:133. doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0359- x pmid:26453044. · DOI
  10. [36]36. Saitz R, Palfai TP, Cheng DM, et al. Screening and brief intervention for drug use in primary care: the ASPIRE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014;356:502-13. doi:10.1001/ jama.2014.7862 pmid:25096690.
  11. [38]38. Rehm J, Anderson P, Manthey J, et al. Alcohol use disorders in primary health care: what do we know and where do we go?Alcohol Alcohol 2016;356:422-7. doi:10.1093/alcalc/ agv127 pmid:26574600. · DOI
  12. [49]49. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/ permissions For personal use only: See rights and reprints http://www.bmj.com/permissions Subscribe: http://www.bmj.com/subscribe

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCambridge, J., & Saitz, R.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
McCambridge, Jim
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-01-20
Volume
356
Pages
j116
ISSN
  • 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
OpenAlex
W2572022266
Cited by
146
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21
FWCI
13.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  • Health Resources and Services Administration
  • Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
brief intervention, alcohol consumption, general practice, primary care, alcohol counseling, heavy drinking, alcohol harm prevention, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Counseling, Humans, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review