Cited by 105Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and Behaviors

The impact of a health professional recommendation on weight loss attempts in overweight and obese British adults: a cross-sectional analysis

Open access
Jackson, Sarah E, Wardle, Jane, Johnson, Fiona, Finer, Nicholas, Beeken, Rebecca J·2013·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the effect that health professional (HP) advice to lose weight has on overweight and obese adults’ motivation to lose weight and attempts to lose weight. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Great Britain. Participants: 810 overweight or obese (body mass index ≥25 kg/m 2 ) adults. Main outcome measures: Participants were asked if they had ever received HP advice to lose weight and reported their desire to weigh less (ideal weight ≤95% of current weight) and whether they were attempting to lose weight. Results: Only 17% of overweight and 42% of obese respondents recalled ever having received HP advice to lose weight. HP advice was associated with wanting to weigh less (89% vs 61% among those not receiving advice) and attempting to lose weight (68% vs 37%). In multivariable analyses, HP advice to lose weight was associated with increased odds of wanting to weigh less (OR=3.71, 95% CI 2.10 to 6.55) and attempting to lose weight (OR=3.53, 95% CI 2.44 to 5.10) independent of demographic characteristics and weight status. Conclusions: HP advice to lose weight appears to increase motivation to lose weight and weight loss behaviour, but only a minority of overweight or obese adults receive such advice. Better training for HPs in delivering brief weight counselling could offer an opportunity to improve obese patients’ motivation to lose weight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003693

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Obesity: the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children. NICE, 2006 http://www.nice.org.uk/ (accessed 17 Jun 2013). 22497033

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackson, S. E., Wardle, J., Johnson, F., Finer, N., & Beeken, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Bariatric Medicine and Surgery, University College London Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, UK
Corresponding author
Beeken, Rebecca J
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-11
Volume
3
Issue
11
Pages
e003693
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164156437
Cited by
105
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4
FWCI
20.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (14133)
  • Medical Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
provider recommendation, weight loss, obesity, overweight, weight loss motivation, health professions education, ideal body weight, UK adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review