Cited by 54Reproductive System and PregnancyMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumReproductive Health and Technologies

Hope for the best … but expect the worst: a qualitative study to explore how women with recurrent miscarriage experience the early waiting period of a new pregnancy

Open access
Bailey, Sarah Louise, Boivin, Jacky, Cheong, Ying C, Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen, Bailey, Christopher, Macklon, Nick·2019·BMJ Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how women experience the initial period of a new pregnancy after suffering recurrent miscarriage (RM). DESIGN: A qualitative study, nested within a randomised controlled feasibility study of a coping intervention for RM, used semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic network approach. SETTING: Participants were recruited from the Recurrent Miscarriage Clinic and Early Pregnancy Unit in two tertiary referral hospitals in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 14 women with RMs and who had previously participated in the randomised controlled trial (RCT) feasibility component of the study were recruited. RESULTS: Seven organising themes emerged from the data: (1) turmoil of emotions, (2) preparing for the worst, (3) setting of personal milestones, (4) hypervigilance, (5) social isolation, (6) adoption of pragmatic approaches, (7) need for professional affirmation. CONCLUSIONS: The study established that for women with a history of RM, the waiting period of a new pregnancy is a traumatic time of great uncertainty and emotional turmoil and one in which they express a need for emotional support. Consideration should be given to the manner in which supportive care is best delivered within the constraints of current health service provision. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN43571276.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029354

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Identity tension can extend into subsequent pregnancies, often permeated by fear, guilt, and anxiety, and the bond with the new baby tends to be formed cautiously as a strategy of emotional self-protection.

    “In-line with the results of this review, synthesis, and meta-ethnography, it was found that this identity tension can extend into subsequent pregnancies, often permeated by fear, guilt, and anxiety. In such cases, the bond with the new baby tends to be formed cautiously as a strategy of emotional self-protection (55).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Lazarus RS, Folkman S Stress, appraisal, and coping / Richard S. Lazarus, Susan Folkman. New York: Springer, 1984.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bailey, S. L., Boivin, J., Cheong, Y. C., Kitson-Reynolds, E., Bailey, C., & Macklon, N.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Princess Anne Hospital (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Zealand University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Bailey, Sarah Louise
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-05
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e029354
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947047271
Cited by
54
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Programme Grants for Applied Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
recurrent pregnancy loss, early pregnancy, waiting period, women's experiences, emotional turmoil, hypervigilance, social isolation, coping, emotional support, coping interventions
MeSH terms
Abortion, Habitual, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Qualitative Research, Hope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review