Cited by 447COVID-19 and healthcare impactsGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Estimated impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer services and excess 1-year mortality in people with cancer and multimorbidity: near real-time data on cancer care, cancer deaths and a population-based cohort study

Open access
Lai, Alvina G, Pasea, Laura, Banerjee, Amitava, Hall, Geoff, Denaxas, Spiros, Chang, Wai Hoong, Katsoulis, Michail, Williams, Bryan +20 more·2020·BMJ Open

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Cancer and multiple non-cancer conditions are considered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as high risk conditions in the COVID-19 emergency. Professional societies have recommended changes in cancer service provision to minimize COVID-19 risks to cancer patients and health care workers. However, we do not know the extent to which cancer patients, in whom multi-morbidity is common, may be at higher overall risk of mortality as a net result of multiple factors including COVID-19 infection, changes in health services, and socioeconomic factors. Methods: We report multi-center, weekly cancer diagnostic referrals and chemotherapy treatments until April 2020 in England and Northern Ireland. We analyzed population-based health records from 3,862,012 adults in England to estimate 1-year mortality in 24 cancer sites and 15 non-cancer comorbidity clusters (40 conditions) recognized by CDC as high-risk. We estimated overall (direct and indirect) effects of COVID-19 emergency on mortality under different Relative Impact of the Emergency (RIE) and different Proportions of the population Affected by the Emergency (PAE). We applied the same model to the US, using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data. Results: Weekly data until April 2020 demonstrate significant falls in admissions for chemotherapy (45-66% reduction) and urgent referrals for early cancer diagnosis (70-89% reduction), compared to pre-emergency levels. Under conservative assumptions of the emergency affecting only people with newly diagnosed cancer (incident cases) at COVID-19 PAE of 40%, and an RIE of 1.5, the model estimated 6,270 excess deaths at 1 year in England and 33,890 excess deaths in the US. In England, the proportion of patients with incident cancer with ≥1 comorbidity was 65.2%. The number of comorbidities was strongly associated with cancer mortality risk. Across a range of model assumptions, and across incident and prevalent cancer cases, 78% of excess deaths occur in cancer patients with ≥1 comorbidity. Conclusion: We provide the first estimates of potential excess mortality among people with cancer and multimorbidity due to the COVID-19 emergency and demonstrate dramatic changes in cancer services. To better inform prioritization of cancer care and guide policy change, there is an urgent need for weekly data on cause-specific excess mortality, cancer diagnosis and treatment provision and better intelligence on the use of effective treatments for comorbidities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043828

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence COVID-19 rapid guideline: delivery of systemic anticancer treatments. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng161/chapter/6-Prioritising-systemic-anticancer-treatments [Accessed 19 Apr 2020]. 33497155
  2. [15]Sud A, Jones ME, Broggio J, et al Collateral damage: the impact on outcomes from cancer surgery of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Oncol 2020; 31: 1065– 74. 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.05.009 32442581 PMC7237184 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lai, A. G., Pasea, L., Banerjee, A., Hall, G., Denaxas, S., Chang, W. H., Katsoulis, M., Williams, B., Pillay, D., Noursadeghi, M., Linch, D., Hughes, D., Forster, M. D., Turnbull, C., Fitzpatrick, N. K., Boyd, K., Foster, G. R., Enver, T., Nafilyan, V., Humberstone, B., Neal, R. D., Cooper, M., Jones, M., Pritchard-Jones, K., Sullivan, R., Davie, C., Lawler, M., & Hemingway, H.
Affiliations
  • Health Data Research UK (GB)
  • Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • The Alan Turing Institute (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • UCL Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
  • Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
  • Northern Ireland Cancer Network, Northern Ireland, UK
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Office for National Statistics, London, UK
  • Office for National Statistics (GB)
  • DATA-CAN, Health Data Research UK hub for cancer hosted by UCLPartners, London, UK
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Lai, Alvina G
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-11
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
e043828
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3098511379
Cited by
447
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 60
FWCI
33.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Health Data Research UK - DATA-CAN (MC_PC_19006)
  • Wellcome Trust (204841/Z/16/Z)
  • National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (BRC714/HI/RW/101440)
  • National Institute for Health Research Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre (19RX02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, cancer care, excess mortality, multimorbidity, urgent cancer referral, cancer mortality, indirect mortality, healthcare disruption, general practitioner services
MeSH terms
Multimorbidity, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Cause of Death, England, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Population Surveillance, Time Factors, Models, Statistical, Survival Rate, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review