Cited by 27Nursing education and managementWorkplace Health and Well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The relationship between leader support, staff influence over decision making, work pressure and patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional analysis of NHS datasets in England

Open access
West, Thomas H R, Daher, Pascale, Dawson, Jeremy F, Lyubovnikova, Joanne, Buttigieg, Sandra C, West, Michael A·2022·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective To explore the relationships between leader support, staff influence over decisions, work pressure and patient satisfaction. Design A cross-sectional study of large National Health Service (NHS) datasets in England in 2010. Setting and participants 158 NHS acute hospital trusts in England (n=63 156) from all staff groups. Primary and secondary outcome measures Survey data measuring leader support, staff influence over decision making, staff work pressure and objective outcome data measuring patient satisfaction. Results Multilevel serial mediation analysis showed a significantly positive association between leader support and staff influence over decisions ( B =0.74, SE =0.07, p <0.01). Furthermore, staff influence over decisions showed a negative association with staff work pressure ( B =−0.84, SE =0.41, p <0.05) which in turn was negatively linked to patient satisfaction ( B =−17.50, SE =4.34, p <0.01). Serial mediation showed a positive indirect effect of leader support on patient satisfaction via staff influence over decisions and work pressure ( B =10.96, SE =5.55, p <0.05). Conclusions and implications Our results provide evidence that leader support influences patient satisfaction through shaping staff experience, particularly staff influence over decisions and work pressure. Patients’ care is dependent on the health, well-being, and effectiveness of the NHS workforce. That, in turn, is determined by the extent to which leaders are supportive in ensuring that work environments are managed in a way which protects the well-being of staff.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052778

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence suggests that improving staff engagement and satisfaction leads to better care quality, patient satisfaction, financial performance and staff retention.

    “However, evidence suggests that improving staff engagement and satisfaction leads to better care quality, patient satisfaction, financial performance and staff retention [143, 144].”

    From Interventions to address empathy-based stress in mental health workers: A scoping review and research agenda (2024) · cites this paper as [143]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that staff job satisfaction and work engagement are associated with patient satisfaction and with fewer adverse care outcomes. It also links work pressure to intentions to quit. The paper does not establish that improving engagement or satisfaction causes these outcomes, and the passages found do not support the claim about financial performance. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Secretary of State for Health. High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report. The Stationery Office, 2008.
  2. [16]West M, Coia D, et al. Caring for doctors, caring for patients. How to transform UK healthcare environments to support doctors and medical students to care for patients. London, 2019. https://www.gmc-uk.org/about/how-we-work/corporate-strategy-plans-and-impact/supporting-a-profession-under-pressure/uk-wide-review-of-doctors-and-medical-students-wellbeing%0Ahttps://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/caring-for-doctors-caring-for-patients_

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
West, T. H. R., Daher, P., Dawson, J. F., Lyubovnikova, J., Buttigieg, S. C., & West, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Health Systems Management & Leadership, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
  • Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
West, Thomas H R
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-02
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
e052778
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210812164
Cited by
27
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • OAR@UM (University of Malta) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
leader support, occupational stress, patient satisfaction, employee well-being, healthcare leadership, serial mediation, hospital staff
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, England, Humans, State Medicine, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review