Cited by 4COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

Challenges of Mental Health in Medical Staffs during COVID-19 Outbreak: A Systematic Review

Open access
Rakhshan, Mahnaz, Hakimi, Hamideh, Mousazadeh, Noushin, Dorri, Safoura·2023·Medicina Clínica Práctica

Abstract

The frontline medical staff are under heavy workload conditions and are at high risk of infection with coronavirus disease 2019. This pandemic has burdened unprecedented psychological stress. The study aimed to compile and analyze the challenges of mental health among medical staff during the COVID-19 outbreak PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, and google scholar databases were systematically searched for published studies. Cross-sectional studies examining the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the medical staff's mental health were selected. Eventually, 7 articles were extracted for the final analysis after reviewing the titles, abstracts, and full text. The results show that the most common psychological problems of medical staff include stress, anxiety, and depression. The medical staff had higher levels of fear, anxiety, and stress than the management staff. Among physicians and nurses, the two groups that are most involved with patients with COVID-19, the nurses showed more anxiety and stress than physicians. The mental health of the medical staff during the COVID-19 epidemic is at greater risk than ever before. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt comprehensive and effective supportive policies and strategies for health systems and governments. El personal médico de primera línea se encuentra en condiciones de gran carga de trabajo y tiene un alto riesgo de infección por la enfermedad del coronavirus 2019. Esta pandemia ha causado un estrés psicológico sin precedentes. El objetivo del estudio fue recopilar y analizar los desafíos de la salud mental en el personal médico durante el brote de COVID-19. Se realizaron búsquedas sistemáticas de estudios publicados en las bases de datos PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science y Google Scholar. Se seleccionaron estudios transversales que examinaran el impacto del brote de COVID-19 en la salud mental del personal médico. Finalmente, se extrajeron 7 artículos para el análisis final después de revisar los títulos, resúmenes y texto completo. Los resultados muestran que los problemas psicológicos más comunes del personal médico incluyen estrés, ansiedad y depresión. El personal médico tenía niveles más altos de miedo, ansiedad y estrés que el personal administrativo. Entre los médicos y enfermeros, los dos grupos que más se involucran con los pacientes con COVID 19, los enfermeros mostraron más ansiedad y estrés que los médicos. La salud mental del personal médico en la epidemia de COVID 19 está en mayor riesgo que nunca. Por lo tanto, es necesario adoptar políticas y estrategias de apoyo integrales y efectivas por parte de los sistemas de salud y los gobiernos.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mcpsp.2022.100361

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Spain, 58.1% of surveyed personnel presented anxiety in 2023 compared to 46.5% in 2022; depression prevalence was 39.5% in 2021 and 37.2% in 2023; the increase in anxiety scores was statistically significant (p < 0.001); perceived quality of life was 42.4 ± 13.0 in 2021 versus 47.1 ± 11.8 in 2022, showing a significant improvement (p < 0.033).

    “Another study conducted in Spain, through an anonymous online survey with occupational and non-occupational variables, Goldberg’s anxiety and depression questionnaire, and the SF-12 conducted in 2023, showed that 58.1% of the surveyed personnel presented anxiety compared to 46.5% in 2022. The prevalence of depression is 39.5% in 2021 and 37.2% in 2023. The increase in anxiety scores was”

    From Mental Health in Healthcare Workers Post-COVID-19: A Latin American Review and Insights into Personalized Management Strategies (2024) · cites this paper as [28]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Jiang Y. Psychological impact and coping strategies of frontline medical staff in Hunan between January and March 2020 during the outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei China Med Sci Monit 26 2020 e924171 PMC7177038 32291383

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rakhshan, M., Hakimi, H., Mousazadeh, N., & Dorri, S.
Affiliations
  • Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Mousazadeh, Noushin
Venue
Medicina Clínica Práctica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
100361
ISSN
2603-9249 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313419573
Cited by
4
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Medicina Clínica Práctica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (7444)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, mental health, healthcare workers, psychological stress, anxiety, depression, nurses, physicians, frontline health workers, fear, workplace mental health, workload, infection risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review