Cited by 35Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careResilience and Mental Health

The Burden of Multiple Sclerosis and Patients’ Coping Strategies

Lorefice, Lorena, Fenu, Giuseppe, Frau, Jessica, Coghe, Giancarlo, Marrosu, Maria Giovanna, Cocco, Eleonora·2018·BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care

Abstract

Objectives Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease that mainly affects young people. Patients with MS experience several emotional responses to changed perceptions of themselves and manage this situation in ways focused on controlling the overall burden of disease. This present study aimed to evaluate differences between patients with MS and healthy controls (HCs) in coping styles, identifying the MS clinical features that influence adaptive responses. Methods Patients with MS, according to the McDonald 2010 criteria, and HCs were recruited. Coping strategies were assessed using the Coping Orientation to the Problems Experienced (COPE-NVI; Italian version) questionnaire. Results A cohort of 135 patients with MS (female: 89/135, 65.9%) and 94 HCs (female: 64/94, 68%) were enrolled. Impairedsocial support and problem solvingwas noted for MS group (p=0.005). In the MS group, thesocial supportworsened with increasing disease duration (p=0.002) independently of the level of disability. Associations between a higher Expanded Disability Status Scale score andavoidance strategies(p<0.01), as well between avoidance strategiesand a previous depression diagnosis (p<0.001) were reported. Conclusion Our findings highlight the negative impact of MS on various aspects of patients’ life. Therefore, psychosocial interventions are needed to increase adaptive coping mechanisms aimed to manage the burden of MS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001324

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have shown that greater physical disability, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale, is associated with the employment of emotional and avoidance coping strategies.

    “several studies have shown that greater physical disability, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS; [26]), is associated with the employment of emotional and avoidance coping strategies [22,23,27,28].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lorefice, L., Fenu, G., Frau, J., Coghe, G., Marrosu, M. G., & Cocco, E.
Affiliations
University of Cagliari (IT)
Corresponding author
Lorefice, Lorena
Venue
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-06-24
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
38-40
ISSN
  • 2045-435X (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-4368
OpenAlex
W2706200025
Cited by
35
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, coping strategies, disease burden, social support, problem solving, avoidance coping, depression, disability progression, disease duration, psychosocial interventions
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Social Support, Cohort Studies, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review