Cited by 38Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careResilience and Mental Health

Use of Coping Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis: Association with Demographic and Disease-Related Characteristics ✰

Open access
Holland, D.P., Schlüter, D.K., Young, C.A., Mills, R.J., Rog, D.J., Ford, H.L., Orchard, K.·2019·Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

Abstract

Background Coping positively and negatively influences psychosocial and other outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS), but there is conflicting evidence about the use of different coping strategies and their associations with demographic and disease characteristics. Our aims were to examine which coping strategies are used by a large sample of people with MS, then to identify any associations between demographic and disease related factors with use of individual coping strategies.Methods Participants in the Trajectories of Outcomes in Neurological Conditions (TONiC) study completed the Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (COPE60) questionnaire. Relationships between demographic and clinical characteristics and coping strategies were examined by multiple ordinal logistic regression to assess the effect of each potential predictor after adjustment for other possible covariates.Results From 722 patients, the most commonly used strategy was Acceptance, followed by Active Coping, Planning and Positive Reinterpretation and Growth. All but two strategies showed significant associations with demographic and clinical characteristics. The most marked effects were found for Restraint, with people in employment 2.1 times as likely to utilise this strategy compared to those unemployed, and Seeking of Emotional Social Support and Focus on and Venting of Emotions, which were utilised twice as much by women compared to men. Behavioural and Mental Disengagement were highly associated with greater disability and not being in employment.Conclusion Clinicians should be aware of several disease and demographic characteristics that are associated with use of potentially maladaptive coping strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.016

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have shown that greater physical disability, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale, is associated with the employment of emotional and avoidance coping strategies.

    “several studies have shown that greater physical disability, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS; [26]), is associated with the employment of emotional and avoidance coping strategies [22,23,27,28].”
  • Most MS patients use a combination of problem- and emotion-focused coping strategies, namely acceptance, planning, positive reinterpretation and growth, and active coping.

    “Holland et al. [29] found that most MS patients use a combination of problem- and emotion-focused coping strategies, namely acceptance, planning, positive reinterpretation and growth, and active coping.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holland, D. P., Schlüter, D. K., Young, C. A., Mills, R. J., Rog, D. J., Ford, H. L., & Orchard, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • Walton Centre (GB)
  • Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Brighton General Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Holland, D.P.
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
27
Pages
214-222
ISSN
2211-0348 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896766300
Cited by
38
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Neurological Disability Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, coping strategies, maladaptive coping, acceptance, restraint, social support seeking, venting, disability, employment status, sex differences, demographic factors, disease factors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Employment, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Comorbidity, Substance-Related Disorders, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review