Cited by 60Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Guided digital health intervention for depression in Lebanon: randomised trial

Open access
Cuijpers, Pim, Heim, Eva, Ramia, Jinane Abi, Burchert, Sebastian, Carswell, Kenneth, Cornelisz, Ilja, Knaevelsrud, Christine, Noun, Philip +5 more·2022·Evidence-Based Mental Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most people with mental disorders in communities exposed to adversity in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) do not receive effective care. Digital mental health interventions are scalable when digital access is adequate, and can be safely delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a new WHO-guided digital mental health intervention, Step-by-Step, supported by a non-specialist helper in Lebanon, in the context of concurring economic, humanitarian and political crises, a large industrial disaster and the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a single-blind, two-arm pragmatic randomised trial, comparing guided Step-by-Step with enhanced care as usual (ECAU) among people suffering from depression and impaired functioning. Primary outcomes were depression (Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)) and impaired functioning (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule-12 (WHODAS)) at post-treatment. FINDINGS: 680 people with depression (PHQ-9>10) and impaired functioning (WHODAS>16) were randomised to Step-by-Step or ECAU. Intention-to-treat analyses showed effects on depression (standardised mean differences, SMD: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.97), impaired functioning (SMD: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.65), post-traumatic stress (SMD: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.79), anxiety (SMD: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.99), subjective well-being (SMD: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.62) and self-identified personal problems (SMD: 0.56; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.83). Significant effects on all outcomes were retained at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Guided digital mental health interventions can be effective in the treatment of depression in communities exposed to adversities in LMICs, although some uncertainty remains because of high attrition. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Guided digital mental health interventions should be considered for implementation in LMICs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03720769.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300416

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial studies on a guided self-help version of SbS with weekly phone contacts in Lebanon found positive treatment effects on indicators of psychological distress and functioning in Syrian refugees and Lebanese local populations.

    “Initial studies on a guided self-help version of SbS with weekly phone contacts in Lebanon found positive treatment effects on indicators of psychological distress and functioning in Syrian refugees and Lebanese local populations [23,37,38].”

    From Effects of a self-guided digital mental health self-help intervention for Syrian refugees in Egypt: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Discussion reports improvements in psychological symptoms and functioning, and Methods > Study arms describes weekly support by phone or message. But the Results > Participants table lists 619 Lebanese participants and only two Syrian participants, without identifying them as refugees or reporting effects for that group. The paper therefore supports the finding for the trial population, not a treatment effect in Syrian refugees specifically. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]WHO. mhGAP Intervention Guide - Version 2.0 for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings. Geneva: WHO, 2016. 27786430

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuijpers, P., Heim, E., Ramia, J. A., Burchert, S., Carswell, K., Cornelisz, I., Knaevelsrud, C., Noun, P., van Klaveren, C., van’t Hof, E., Zoghbi, E., van Ommeren, M., & El Chammay, R.
Affiliations
  • Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Ministry of Public Health (LB)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Department of Educational, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  • World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  • National Mental Health Programme, Ministry of Public Health of Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
Corresponding author
Cuijpers, Pim
Venue
Evidence-Based Mental Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-05-16
Volume
25
Issue
e1
Pages
e34-e40
ISSN
  • 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-960X
OpenAlex
W4280504610
Cited by
60
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16
FWCI
11.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver
Funders
  • Freie Universität Berlin (R2HC)
  • Research for Health in Humanitarian Crises (N/A)
  • European Union (733337)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, digital mental health interventions, guided intervention, impaired functioning, post-traumatic stress, anxiety, subjective well-being, WHO guidelines, Lebanon, humanitarian crisis, COVID-19 pandemic, low- and middle-income countries, attrition
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Depression, Humans, Lebanon, Single-Blind Method, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review