Cited by 159Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health Interventions

Psychotherapies for depression in low- and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis

Open access
Cuijpers, Pim, Karyotaki, Eirini, Reijnders, Mirjam, Purgato, Marianna, Barbui, Corrado·2018·World Psychiatry

Abstract

Most psychotherapies for depression have been developed in high‐income Western countries of North America, Europe and Australia. A growing number of randomized trials have examined the effects of these treatments in non‐Western countries. We conducted a meta‐analysis of these studies to examine whether these psychotherapies are effective and to compare their effects between studies from Western and non‐Western countries. We conducted systematic searches in bibliographical databases and included 253 randomized controlled trials, of which 32 were conducted in non‐Western countries. The effects of psychotherapies in non‐Western countries were large (g=1.10; 95% CI: 0.91‐1.30), with high heterogeneity (I 2=90; 95% CI: 87‐92). After adjustment for publication bias, the effect size dropped to g=0.73 (95% CI: 0.51‐0.96). Subgroup analyses did not indicate that adaptation to the local situation was associated with the effect size. Comparisons with the studies in Western countries showed that the effects of the therapies were significantly larger in non‐Western countries, also after adjusting for characteristics of the participants, the treatments and the studies. These larger effect sizes in non‐Western countries may reflect true differences indicating that therapies are indeed more effective; or may be explained by the care‐as‐usual control conditions in non‐Western countries, often indicating that no care was available; or may be the result of the relative low quality of many trials in the field. This study suggests that psychotherapies that were developed in Western countries may or may not be more effective in non‐Western countries, but they are probably no less effective and can therefore also be used in these latter countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20493

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 2 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Heterogeneity of effects in non-Western countries was very high, I2 = 90 (95% CI 87-92).

    “with high heterogeneity (I 2 590; 95% CI: 87-92).”
    • Also stated in: § Effects of psychotherapies in non-Western countries · plain
      “Heterogeneity was very high (I 2 590; 95% CI: 87-92).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Eight high-income non-Western studies had an effect size of g = 0.86 (95% CI 0.48-1.23; NNT = 3.30; I2 = 71, 95% CI 24-84).

    “We found that the eight studies in high-income, non-Western countries resulted in an effect size of g50.86 (95% CI: 0.48-1.23;NNT53.30;I 2 571; 95% CI: 24-84) compared to g50.59 in Western countries (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Type of control group was significantly associated with effect size, with care-as-usual controls producing higher effects than waiting list and other controls (p = 0.02).

    “We also found that the type of control group was significantly associated with the effect size, with care-as-usual control groups resulting in higher effect sizes than waiting list and other control groups (p50.02).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Bivariate meta-regression found no significant association between effect size and number of treatment sessions (coefficient 0.00; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.04; p = 1.00).

    “the number of treatment sessions (coefficient: 0.00; 95% CI: 20.04 to 0.04; p51.00)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The direct comparison between high-income Western and non-Western countries was not significant (p = 0.17).

    “A direct comparison between high-income countries in Western and non-Western countries did not indicate a significant difference (p50.17),but this may have been related to the small number of studies from high-income non-Western countries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was a significant difference across country income levels, with the highest effect sizes in low- and middle-income countries.

    “We also found a significant difference across countries with different incomes, with the highest effect sizes in low-and middle-income countries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Psychotherapies in non-Western countries had a large pooled effect size, Hedges' g = 1.10 (95% CI 0.91-1.30), corresponding to NNT = 2.51.

    “The effects of psychotherapies in non-Western countries were large (g51.10;95% CI: 0.91-1.30),with high heterogeneity (I 2 590; 95% CI: 87-92).”
    • Also stated in: § Effects of psychotherapies in non-Western countries · plain
      “The overall effect in the 35 comparisons between psychotherapies and control groups was g51.10 (95% CI: 0.91-1.30),which corresponds with a NNT of 2.51.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Thirty-two non-Western studies with 35 comparisons met inclusion criteria.

    “A total of 32 studies conducted in non-Western countries (with 35 comparisons between a psychotherapy and a control condition) met inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Analyses including only one effect size per study produced effect sizes almost the same as the overall analyses, with heterogeneity still very high.

    “As can be seen from Table 2, the resulting effect sizes were almost the same as in the overall analyses.Heterogeneity was still very high in these analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The effect size in Western countries was g = 0.60 (95% CI 0.55-0.64; I2 = 59, 95% CI 53-64; NNT = 4.99), significantly lower than in non-Western countries (p < 0.001).

    “We found that the effect size in Western countries (g5 0.60; 95% CI: 0.55-0.64;I 2 559; 95% CI: 53-64; NNT54.99) was significantly lower than in non-Western countries (p<0.001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In parsimonious stepwise models, risk of bias and type of control group remained significant, as did Western versus non-Western country, region, and income level.

    “As can be seen, in all three models, risk of bias and type of control group remained significant, as well as the dummies indicating Western vs. non-Western countries, the regions and the income level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The meta-analysis included 253 randomized controlled trials, of which 32 were from non-Western countries.

    “We conducted systematic searches in bibliographical databases and included 253 randomized controlled trials, of which 32 were conducted in non-Western countries.”
    • Also stated in: § Selection and inclusion of studies · plain
      “This makes a total of 253 studies that were included in the analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No significant subgroup differences were found for region or country income level.

    “None of the other subgroup analyses resulted in significant differences between subgroups, and that included the region (East Asia, Middle East and North Africa, South Asia, other), the level of income of the country (high, upper middle, low/ lower middle), and whether or not the treatment was adapted to the local situation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The six comparisons with the lowest risk of bias had an effect size of g = 0.51 (95% CI 0.34-0.69; NNT = 6.01), compared with g = 1.20 (95% CI 0.84-1.56; NNT = 2.29) in studies with the highest risk of bias.

    “The six comparisons with the lowest risk of bias (no risk of bias for any of the four items of the assessment tool) had an effect size of g50.51 (95% CI: 0.34-0.69;NNT56.01)compared to g51.20 (95% CI: 0.84-1.56;NNT52.29) in the studies with the highest risk of bias.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Effect sizes differed significantly across regions (p < 0.001), with the lowest in North America, Europe, and Australia and the highest in East Asia, South Asia, and the Middle East and North Africa.

    “We also examined the effect sizes in the different regions and found that they differed significant across regions (p<0.001), with the lowest effect sizes in North America, Europe and Australia, and the highest in East Asia, South Asia and the Middle East and North Africa.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Low-risk-of-bias studies yielded much smaller effect sizes than higher-risk studies, similar to those in Western countries.

    “these studies with low risk of bias had considerably lower effect sizes than those with higher risk, very comparable to the ones found in Western countries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Systematic searches were conducted in bibliographical databases.

    “We conducted systematic searches in bibliographical databases and included 253 randomized controlled trials, of which 32 were conducted in non-Western countries.”
    • Also stated in: § Identification and selection of studies · plain
      “For this database we searched four major bibliographical sources (PubMed, Psyc-INFO, Embase and the Cochrane Library) by combining terms (both index terms and text words) indicative of depression and psychotherapies, with filters for randomized controlled trials.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Quality assessment was conducted by two independent researchers, with disagreements resolved through discussion.

    “Assessment of the quality of the included studies was conducted by two independent researchers, and disagreements were solved through discussion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    A random effects pooling model was used in all analyses because considerable heterogeneity was expected.

    “Because we expected considerable heterogeneity among the studies, we employed a random effects pooling model in all analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Records were screened by two independent researchers, and inclusion/exclusion decisions were made by two independent researchers with disagreements resolved through discussion.

    “All records were screened by two independent researchers and all papers that could possibly meet inclusion criteria according to one of the researchers were retrieved as full text.The decision to include or exclude a study was also done by the two independent researchers, and disagreements were solved through discussion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Publication bias was tested by funnel plot inspection, Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill, and Egger's test.

    “We tested for publication bias by inspecting the funnel plot on primary outcome measures and by Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill procedure 34 , which yields an estimate of the effect size after the publication bias has been taken into account (as implemented in Comprehensive Meta-Analysis).We also conducted Egger's test of the intercept to quantify the bias captured by the funnel plot and to test”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Sensitivity analyses excluded potential outliers, defined as studies whose 95% CI did not overlap with the pooled effect size 95% CI.

    “We conducted sensitivity analyses excluding potential outliers.These were defined as studies in which the 95% CI of the effect size did not overlap with the 95% CI of the pooled effect size.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The study suggests that Western-developed psychotherapies may or may not be more effective in non-Western countries, but are probably no less effective and can be used there.

    “This study suggests that psychotherapies that were developed in Western countries may or may not be more effective in non-Western countries, but they are probably no less effective and can therefore also be used in these latter countries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 32 included non-Western trials are representative of psychotherapies for depression in non-Western countries generally.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Three studies included two psychological treatments compared with the same control group, which may have affected heterogeneity and the pooled effect size.

    “In this meta-analysis, we included three studies in which two psychological treatments were compared with the same control group.This means that multiple comparisons were included in the same analysis, which may have resulted in an artificial reduction of heterogeneity and may have affected the pooled effect size.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Most included studies were of suboptimal quality, with only a few rated high quality.

    “the quality of most of the included studies was not optimal, and only a handful of them had a high quality.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The literature search relied mainly on Western databases, and non-English studies were not directly accessible.

    “our searches mainly focused on Western databases, while studies published in other languages were not directly accessible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Most papers described interventions only briefly, so undetected cultural adaptations cannot be ruled out.

    “because the description of the intervention was very brief in most papers, so that it cannot be excluded that the interventions were still adapted although this was not mentioned in the paper.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Western-developed psychotherapies are likely at least as effective in non-Western countries as in Western ones, so they can be used there irrespective of income level.

    “this study suggests that psychotherapies developed in Western countries may or not be more effective in non-Western countries, but are probably no less effective and can therefore also be used in these latter countries, regardless of their income level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Non-Western studies came mostly from a selected set of Asian countries, with few from Africa or Latin America.

    “most studies in non-Western countries were conducted in a selected sample of countries in Asia, and only few in Africa and Latin America.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Low-intensity interventions could be offered as a first-line treatment.

    “it would be possible to introduce low intensity interventions as a first line treatment”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Low-intensity interventions are simpler and less costly to deliver than high-intensity ones.
25 of 25
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most psychotherapies for depression were developed in high-income Western countries.

    “Most psychotherapies have been developed in high-income Western countries in North America, Europe and Australia, and the vast majority of the more than 450 randomized trials which have examined their effects 20 have been conducted in those countries.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 32 included non-Western trials are representative of psychotherapies for depression in non-Western countries generally.

    “This study suggests that psychotherapies that were developed in Western countries may or may not be more effective in non-Western countries, but they are probably no less effective and can therefore also be used in these latter countries.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Low-intensity interventions are simpler and less costly to deliver than high-intensity ones.

    “because these are easier and cheaper to implement than high intensity ones.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting upper confidence limits for the same pooled effect

    Minor

    The text and Table 3 report the same effect size and heterogeneity after excluding the three extreme outliers, but give different upper limits for its 95% confidence interval: 1.06 versus 1.02.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beck AT, 1996, BDI‐II, Beck depression Inventory: manual
  2. Orsini N, 2005, Heterogi: Stata module to quantify heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuijpers, P., Karyotaki, E., Reijnders, M., Purgato, M., & Barbui, C.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Verona (IT)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-19
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
90-101
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W2724934802
Cited by
159
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
19.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
depression, psychotherapy, low- and middle-income countries, cross-cultural generalizability, treatment effectiveness, publication bias, trial quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review