The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous non-invasive cardiac output measurements in the neonate by electrical velocimetry: a comparison with echocardiography
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Electrical velocimetry (EV) is a non-invasive method of continuous left cardiac output monitoring based on measurement of thoracic electrical bioimpedance. The objective was to validate EV by investigating the agreement in cardiac output measurements performed by EV and echocardiography. DESIGN: In this prospective observational study, left ventricular output (LVO) was simultaneously measured by EV (LVO(ev)) using Aesculon and by echocardiography (LVO(echo)) in healthy term neonates during the first 2 postnatal days. To determine the agreement between the two methods, we calculated the bias (mean difference) and precision (1.96×SD of the difference). As LVO(echo) has its own limitations, the authors also calculated the 'true precision' of EV adjusted for echocardiography as the reference method. RESULTS: The authors performed 115 paired measurements in 20 neonates. LVO(ev) and LVO(echo) were similar (534±105 vs 538±105 ml/min, p=0.7). The bias and precision of EV were -4 and 234 ml/min, respectively. The authors found the true precision of EV to be similar to the precision of echocardiography (31.6% vs 30%, respectively). There was no difference in bias and precision between the measurements obtained in patients with or without a haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus. CONCLUSIONS: EV is as accurate in measuring LVO as echocardiography and the variation in the agreement between EV and echocardiography among the individual subjects reflects the limitations of both techniques.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“while Noori et al. examined left ventricular output in preterm neonates with and without patent ductus arteriosus, finding good agreement between the two modalities [73].”
From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Suttner, S. W., Schöllhorn, T., Boldt, J., Mayer, J., Röhm, K. D., Lang, K., & Piper, S. N. (2006) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0409-x · Cited by 88
RetractedAgreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2007) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543400701329422 · Cited by 1,864
Critchley, L. A. H., & Critchley, J. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing · doi:10.1023/a:1009982611386 · Cited by 1,328
Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system.
Kubicek, W. G., Karnegis, J. N., PATTERSON, R. P., Witsoe, D. A., & Mattson, R. H. (1966) · PubMed · Cited by 1,143
Cecconi, M., Rhodes, A., Poloniecki, J., Della Rocca, G., & Grounds, R. M. (2009) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc7129 · Cited by 351
Kluckow, M. R., & Evans, N. (1995) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70172-9 · Cited by 265
Noninvasive pulsed Doppler determination of cardiac output in neonates and children
Alverson, D. C., Eldridge, M. W., Dillon, T., Yabek, S. M., & Berman, W. (1982) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80178-9 · Cited by 232
Chew, M. S., & Poelaert, J. (2003) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-003-1967-9 · Cited by 151
Electrical velocimetry for measuring cardiac output in children with congenital heart disease
Norozi, K., Beck, C. E., Osthaus, W. A., Wille, I., Wessel, A., & Bertram, H. (2007) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aem320 · Cited by 128
Zoremba, N., Bickenbach, J., Krauss, B., Rossaint, R., Kuhlen, R., & Schälte, G. (2007) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01445.x · Cited by 106
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neonatal Hemodynamics: From Developmental Physiology to Comprehensive Monitoring
Vrancken, S. L. A. G., van Heijst, A. F. J., & de Boode, W. P. (2018) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2018.00087 · Cited by 124
Sanders, M. L., Servaas, S., & Slagt, C. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing · doi:10.1007/s10877-019-00330-y · Cited by 101
Hemodynamic Assessment and Monitoring of Premature Infants
EL-Khuffash, A. F., & McNamara, P. J. (2017) · Clinics in Perinatology · doi:10.1016/j.clp.2017.02.001 · Cited by 73
Suehiro, K., Joosten, A., Murphy, L. S.-L., Desebbe, O., Alexander, B. S., Kim, S.-H., & Cannesson, M. P. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing · doi:10.1007/s10877-015-9757-9 · Cited by 73
Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Hemodynamic Instability in Neonatal Shock
Singh, Y., Katheria, A. C., & Vora, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2018.00002 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Noori, S., Drabu, B., Soleymani, S., & Seri, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Children's Hospital of Oklahoma (US)
- 1Division of Neonatology and the Center for Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles and the LAC+USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Corresponding author
- Noori, Shahab
- ORCID
- Noori, Shahab
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-08-29
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- F340-F343
- ISSN
- 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2052
- OpenAlex
- W2114998295
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
- Keywords
- electrical velocimetry, cardiac output monitoring, neonates, impedance cardiography, echocardiography, left ventricular output, measurement agreement, patent ductus arteriosus, noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Cardiac Output, Echocardiography, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Prospective Studies, Rheology, Ventricular Function, Left, Critical Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
