Cited by 52Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyCongenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Low and Very Low Birth Weight: A Method Comparison

Open access
Grollmuss, Oswin, Gonzalez, Patricia·2014·Frontiers in Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac output (CO) measurement in low (LBW) and very low (VLBW) birth weight infants is difficult. Hitherto, sporadical transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the only non-invasive measurement method. Electrical velocimetry (EV) has been evaluated as an alternative in normal weight newborns. OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to evaluate if EV could be interchangeable with TTE even in LBW and VLBW infants. METHODS: In 28 (17 LBW, 11 VLBW) pre-mature newborns, n = 228 simultaneous TTE (trans-aortic Doppler), and EV measurements (134 LBW, 94 VLBW) of stroke volume (SV) and heart rate (HR) were performed, thereof calculating body weight indexed SV (=SV*) and CO (=CO*) for all patients and the subgroups. Method comparison was performed by Bland-Altman plot, method precision expressed by calculation of the coefficient of variation (CV). RESULTS: Mean CO* in all patients was 256.4 ± 44.8 (TTE) and 265.3 ± 48.8 (EV) ml/kg/min. Bias and precision were clinically acceptable, limits of agreement within the 30% criterion for method interchangeability (17). According to their different anatomic dimensions and pathophysiology, there were significant differences of SV(*), HR, and CO* for LBW and VLBW infants as well for inotropic treatment and ventilation mode. CONCLUSION: Extending recent publications on EV/TTE comparison in newborns, this study suggests that EV is also applicable in LWB/VLBW infants as a safe and easy to handle method for continuous CO monitoring in the NICU and PCICU.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fped.2014.00016

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grollmuss et al. compared stroke volume measurements obtained through EC and TTE in preterm infants with low and very low birth weights.

    “Grollmuss et al. compared stroke volume measurements obtained through EC and TTE in preterm infants with low and very low birth weights [72], while Noori et al. examined left ventricular output in preterm neonates with and without patent ductus arteriosus, finding good agreement between the two modalities [73].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1]Pinsky MR Recent advances in the clinical application of heart-lung interactions. Curr Opin Crit Care (2002) 8: 26– 31 10.1097/00075198-200202000-00005 12205403 · DOI
  2. [2]Shekerdemian L Bohn D Cardiovascular effects of mechanical ventilation. Arch Dis Child (1999) 80: 475– 80 10.1136/adc.80.5.475 10208959 PMC1717913 · DOI
  3. [3]Polin RA The Committee on Fetus and Newborn Management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics (2012) 129: 1006 10.1542/peds.2012-0541 22547779 · DOI
  4. [4]Tibby SM Hatherill M Marsh JJ Murdoch I Clinicians’ abilities to estimate cardiac index in ventilated children and infants. Arch Dis Child (1997) 77: 516– 8 10.1136/adc.77.6.516 9496187 PMC1717412 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Nwankwo MU Lorenz JM Gardiner JC A standard protocol for blood pressure measurement in the newborn. Pediatrics (1997) 99: e10 10.1542/peds.99.6.e10 9164806 · DOI
  6. [6]Mittnacht AJ Near infrared spectroscopy in children at high risk of low perfusion. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol (2010) 23(3): 342– 7 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283393936 20421789 · DOI
  7. [7]Hudson I Houston A Aitchison T Holland B Turner T Reproducibility of measurements of cardiac output in newborn infants by Doppler ultrasound. Arch Dis Child (1990) 65: 15– 9 10.1136/adc.65.1_Spec_No.15 2407197 PMC1590175 · DOI
  8. [8]Kubicek WG Karnegis JN Patterson RP Witsoe DA Mattson RH Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerosp Med (1966) 37(12): 1208– 12 5339656
  9. [9]Bernstein DP Lemmens HJ Stroke volume equation for impedance cardiography. Med Biol Eng Comput (2005) 43(4): 443– 50 10.1007/BF02344724 16255425 · DOI
  10. [10]Tomaske M Knirsch W Kretschmar O Woitzek K Balmer C Schmitz A Working group on non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring in paediatrics. Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of Aesculon cardiac output monitor and thermodilution. Br J Anaesth (2008) 100(4): 517– 30 10.1093/bja/aen024 18305081 · DOI
  11. [11]Zoremba N Bickenbach J Krauss B Rossaint R Kuhlen R Schälte G Comparison of electrical velocimetry and thermodilution techniques for the measurement of cardiac output. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand (2007) 51: 1314– 9 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01445.x 17944633 · DOI
  12. [12]Norozi K Beck C Osthaus WA Wille I Wessel A Bertram H Electrical velocimetry for measuring cardiac output in children with congenital heart disease. Br J Anaesth (2007) 100(1): 88– 94 10.1093/bja/aem320 18024954 · DOI
  13. [13]Schmidt C Theilmeier G van Aken H Korsmeier P Wirtz SP Berendes E Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output. Br J Anaesth (2005) 95: 603– 10 10.1093/bja/aei224 16155037 · DOI
  14. [14]Schubert S Schmitz T Weiss M Nagdyman H Huebler M Alexi-Meskishvili V Continuous, non-invasive techniques to determine cardiac output in children after cardiac surgery: evaluation of transesophageal Doppler and electric velocimetry. J Clin Monit Comput (2008) 22: 299– 307 10.1007/s10877-008-9133-0 18665449 · DOI
  15. [16]Grollmuss O Demontoux S Capderou A Serraf A Belli E Electrical velocimetry as a tool for measuring cardiac output in small infants after heart surgery. Intensive Care Med (2012) 38(6): 1032– 9 10.1007/s00134-012-2530-3 22460851 · DOI
  16. [17]Critchley LA Critchley JA A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput (1999) 15(2): 85– 91 10.1023/A:1009982611386 12578081 · DOI
  17. [19]Preiss D Fisher J A measure of confidence in Bland-Altman analysis for the interchangeability of two methods of measurement. J Clin Monit Comput (2008) 22: 257– 9 10.1007/s10877-008-9127-y 18607545 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grollmuss, O., & Gonzalez, P.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Grollmuss, Oswin
Venue
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Published
2014-03-25
Volume
2
Pages
16-16
ISSN
2296-2360 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092611586
Cited by
52
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
cardiac output measurement, electrical velocimetry, transthoracic echocardiography, low birth weight infants, very low birth weight infants, preterm infants, stroke volume, method comparison, method interchangeability, mechanical ventilation, neonatal intensive care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review