Cited by 65ECG Monitoring and AnalysisCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring for Discharged Emergency Department Patients with Possible Cardiac Arrhythmias

Open access
Schreiber, Donald, Sattar, Ayesha, Drigalla, Dorian, Higgins, Steven·2014·Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many emergency department (ED) patients have symptoms that may be attributed to arrhythmias, necessitating outpatient ambulatory cardiac monitoring. Consensus is lacking on the optimal duration of monitoring. We describe the use of a novel device applied at ED discharge that provides continuous prolonged cardiac monitoring. METHODS: We enrolled discharged adult ED patients with symptoms of possible cardiac arrhythmia. A novel, single use continuous recording patch (Zio®Patch) was applied at ED discharge. Patients wore the device for up to 14 days or until they had symptoms to trigger an event. They then returned the device by mail for interpretation. Significant arrhythmias are defined as: ventricular tachycardia (VT) ≥4 beats, supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) ≥4 beats, atrial fibrillation, ≥3 second pause, 2nd degree Mobitz II, 3rd degree AV Block, or symptomatic bradycardia. RESULTS: There were 174 patients were enrolled and all mailed back their devices. The average age was 52.2 (± 21.0) years, and 55% were female. The most common indications for device placement were palpitations 44.8%, syncope 24.1% and dizziness 6.3%. Eighty-three patients (47.7%) had ≥1 arrhythmias and 17 (9.8%) were symptomatic at the time of their arrhythmia. Median time to first arrhythmia was 1.0 days (IQR 0.2-2.8) and median time to first symptomatic arrhythmia was 1.5 days (IQR 0.4-6.7). 93 (53.4%) of symptomatic patients did not have any arrhythmia during their triggered events. The overall diagnostic yield was 63.2% CONCLUSION: The Zio®Patch cardiac monitoring device can efficiently characterize symptomatic patients without significant arrhythmia and has a higher diagnostic yield for arrhythmias than traditional 24-48 hour Holter monitoring. It allows for longer term monitoring up to 14 days.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5811/westjem.2013.11.18973

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schreiber, D., Sattar, A., Drigalla, D., & Higgins, S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Scripps Memorial Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Schreiber, Donald
Venue
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published
2014
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
194-198
ISSN
  • 1936-900X (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-9018
OpenAlex
W2095917950
Cited by
65
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Western Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • School of Medicine, Stanford University
  • Stanford Bio-X
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
ambulatory cardiac monitoring, cardiac arrhythmias, emergency department discharge, prolonged cardiac monitoring, Holter monitoring, ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, syncope, palpitations, diagnostic yield
MeSH terms
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation, Bradycardia, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Tachycardia, Supraventricular, Time Factors, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review