Cited by 89Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCoronary Artery Anomalies

Clinical characteristics of patients with obstructive coronary lesions in the absence of coronary calcification: an evaluation by coronary CT angiography

Open access
Marwan, M, Ropers, D, Pflederer, T, Daniel, W G, Achenbach, S·2009·Heart

Abstract

Background: Multidetector CT allows detection of coronary artery calcium and, after contrast injection, visualisation of the coronary artery lumen. It is commonly assumed that the absence of coronary calcification makes the presence of obstructive coronary lesions highly unlikely. This study evaluates the clinical characteristics of patients with at least one symptomatic, high-grade coronary artery stenosis in both computed tomography and invasive angiography but absence of any coronary calcification and compares the results with patients with stenoses in the setting of detectable coronary calcium Patients and methods: The study retrospectively identified 21 consecutive patients with symptoms in whom a high-grade coronary artery stenosis had been identified in 64-slice or dual-source CT coronary angiography (Siemens Sensation 64 or Siemens Definition, 120 kV, 50 to 85 ml of intravenous contrast at 5 ml/s) in the absence of coronary calcium and in whom that finding had been confirmed by invasive coronary angiography. Clinical presentation (“unstable”: all forms of acute coronary syndrome versus “stable”: stable chest pain or dyspnoea on exertion) and standard cardiovascular risk factors were assessed, and the results were compared with 42 consecutive patients with symptoms in whom both coronary calcium and coronary stenoses had been identified in computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography. Results: The majority of patients with coronary stenoses in the absence of coronary calcium presented with “unstable” symptoms (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina), significantly more frequently than patients with detectable calcification (71% vs 26%, p = 0.001). The age range of patients without calcium was 33 to 76 years, their mean age was younger (53 (SD 13) vs 63 (8) years, p<0.001), but none of the risk factors showed any significant difference compared with patients with calcification. Conclusion: The presence of significant coronary artery stenosis in the absence of coronary calcium is possible. It is more likely in the setting of unstable angina or NSTEMI than in stable chest pain and occurs more frequently in younger patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/hrt.2008.153353

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Significant stenosis without coronary calcium is more likely in unstable angina or NSTEMI than in stable chest pain, and occurs more frequently in younger patients.

    “It is more likely in the setting of unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) than in stable chest pain, and occurs more frequently in younger patients.155”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marwan, M., Ropers, D., Pflederer, T., Daniel, W. G., & Achenbach, S.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Marwan, M
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2009-04-22
Volume
95
Issue
13
Pages
1056-1060
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2130985927
Cited by
89
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Coronary Artery Anomalies
Keywords
coronary artery calcification, coronary artery stenosis, coronary CT angiography, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stable chest pain, clinical features, cardiovascular risk factors, young patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Calcinosis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Coronary Angiography, Coronary Stenosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review