Cited by 233Electronic Health Records SystemsTechnology and Human Factors in Education and HealthHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Controlled Trial of Direct Physician Order Entry: Effects on Physicians' Time Utilization in Ambulatory Primary Care Internal Medicine Practices

Open access
Overhage, J. M., Perkins, S., Tierney, W. M., McDonald, C. J.·2001·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Direct physician order entry (POE) offers many potential benefits, but evidence suggests that POE requires substantially more time than traditional paper-based ordering methods. The Medical Gopher is a well-accepted system for direct POE that has been in use for more than 15 years. The authors hypothesized that physicians using the Gopher would not spend any more time writing orders than physicians using paper-based methods. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial of POE using the Medical Gopher system in 11 primary care internal medicine practices. MEASUREMENTS: The authors collected detailed time use data using time motion studies of the physicians and surveyed their opinions about the POE system. RESULTS: The authors found that physicians using the Gopher spent 2.2 min more per patient overall, but when duplicative and administrative tasks were taken into account, physicians were found to have spent only 0.43 min more per patient. With experience, the order entry time fell by 3.73 min per patient. The survey revealed that the physicians believed that the system improved their patient care and wanted the Gopher to continue to be available in their practices. CONCLUSIONS: Little extra time, if any, was required for physicians to use the POE system. With experience in its use, physicians may even save time while enjoying the many benefits of POE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080361

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [15]15. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, McDonald CJ, Pickett KE. Computer-assisted order entry: impact on intern time use. Clin Res. 1991;39(3):729A.
  2. [22]22. Donald JB. Online prescribing by computer. BMJ. 1986;292:937-9.
  3. [29]29. Tierney WM, Miller ME, McDonald CJ. Informing physicians of test charges reduces outpatient test ordering. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1499-504.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Overhage, J. M., Perkins, S., Tierney, W. M., & McDonald, C. J.
Affiliations
Regenstrief Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Overhage, J. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2001-07-01
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
361-371
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W1784750808
Cited by
232
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
34.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Library of Medicine (N01-LM-63546, N01-LM43510)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
physician time use, internal medicine practice, time and motion study, physician experience, physician attitudes, electronic health records
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Data Collection, Decision Making, Computer-Assisted, Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Microcomputers, Time and Motion Studies, Medical Records Systems, Computerized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review