Cited by 64Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPsychological Testing and AssessmentHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Measuring cognitive change in subjects with prodromal Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Mura, T., Proust-Lima, C., Jacqmin-Gadda, H., Akbaraly, T. N., Touchon, J., Dubois, B., Berr, C.·2014·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the sensitivity of a large set of neuropsychological tests to detect cognitive changes due to prodromal Alzheimer's disease(AD); to compare their metrological properties in order to select a restricted number of these tests for the longitudinal follow-up of subjects with prodromal AD. PARTICIPANTS: 212 patients with mild cognitive impairment were tested at baseline by a standardised neuropsychological battery, which included: the Free and Cued Selective Reminding test (FCSRT), the Benton Visual Retention test, the Deno100, verbal fluency, a serial digit learning test, the double task of Baddeley, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) similarities, the Trail-Making Test and the WAIS digit symbol test. Patients were monitored every 6 months for up to 3 years in order to identify those who converted to AD (retrospectively classified as prodromal AD). Statistical analyses were performed using a nonlinear multivariate mixed model involving a latent process. This model assumes that the psychometric tests are nonlinear transformations of a common latent cognitive process, and it captures the metrological properties of tests. RESULTS: 57 patients converted to AD. The most sensitive tests in the detection of cognitive changes due to prodromal AD were the FCSRT, the semantic verbal fluency and the Deno100. Some tests exhibited a higher sensitivity to cognitive changes for subjects with high levels of cognition, such as the free recall, delayed free recall scores of the FCSRT and the semantic verbal fluency, whereas others showed a higher sensitivity at low levels of cognition, such as the total recall score of the FCSRT. CONCLUSIONS: Tests used for the follow-up of prodromal AD subjects should be chosen among those that actually decline in this stage of the disease and should be selected according to the subject's initial scores.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305078

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [17]Al Aloucy J, Dalla Barba G, Roudier M. Metamemory, self-awareness and anosognosia in patient with mild cognitive impairement, mild Alzheimer’s disease and control healthy older adults. neurology. 2006;66(suppl 2):A129. Abstract S16.005. [Google Scholar]
  2. [22]Benton A. The revised visual retention test: clinical and experimental applications. New york: Psychological corporation; 1963. [Google Scholar]
  3. [23]Kremin H, Perrier D, De Wilde M. DENO-100 Paradigme experimental et test clinique de dénomination controlée: effet relatif de 7 variables expérimentales sur les performances de 16 sujets atteints de maladies dégénératives. Rev Neuropsychol. 1999;9:439–440. [Google Scholar]
  4. [27]Weschler D. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1981. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mura, T., Proust-Lima, C., Jacqmin-Gadda, H., Akbaraly, T. N., Touchon, J., Dubois, B., & Berr, C.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Mura, T.
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-07-09
Volume
85
Issue
4
Pages
363-370
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126474555
Cited by
64
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K013351/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/J023299/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
prodromal Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, longitudinal follow-up, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, verbal fluency, semantic memory, test selection, conversion to Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cognitive Dysfunction, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review