Cited by 36Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plasma Aβ as a biomarker for predicting Aβ-PET status in Alzheimer’s disease:a systematic review with meta-analysis

Open access
Cheng, Lizhen, Li, Wei, Chen, Yixin, Lin, Yijia, Wang, Beiyun, Guo, Qihao, Miao, Ya·2022·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) scan has been proposed to detect amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition in the brain. However, this approach is costly and not ideal for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Blood-based Aβ measurement offers a scalable alternative to the costly or invasive biomarkers. The aim of this study was to statistically validate whether plasma Aβ could predict Aβ-PET status via meta-analysis. Methods: We systematically searched for eligible studies from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, which reported plasma Aβ levels of amyloid-β positron emission tomography-positive (PET (+)) and amyloid-β positron emission tomography-negative (PET (−)) subjects. We generated pooled estimates using random effects meta-analyses. For any study that has significant heterogeneity, metaregression and subgroup analysis were further conducted. Publication bias was appraised by funnel plots and Egger’s test. Results: 16 studies with 3047 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Among all the enrolled studies, 10 studies reported plasma Aβ40 values, while 9 studies reported plasma Aβ42 values and 13 studies reported Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio. The pooled standardised mean difference (SMD) was 0.76 (95% CI −0.61 to 2.14, p=0.28) in the plasma Aβ40 values group. Plasma Aβ42 values group has a pooled SMD of −0.60 (95% CI −0.80 to −0.41, p<0.0001). In the plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio group, the pooled SMD was −1.44 (95% CI −2.17 to −0.72, p<0.0001). Conclusion: Plasma Aβ40 values might not distinguish between PET (+) and PET (−) people. However, plasma Aβ42 values and plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio could be served as independent biomarkers for predicting Aβ-PET status.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2021-327864

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1056/NEJMoa1202753 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/brain/awv199 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Wang, 2020, Plasma pyroglutamate-modified amyloid beta differentiates amyloid pathology, Alzheimers Dement, 12, 1
  5. 10.1186/s13195-020-00619-0 · DOI
  6. Tosun D , Veitch D , Aisen P , et al . Detection of β-amyloid positivity in Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative participants with demographics, cognition, MRI and plasma biomarkers. Brain Commun 2021;3.doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcab008 · DOI
  7. WW, 2019, Brain Amyloid-β deposition and blood biomarkers in patients with clinically diagnosed alzheimer’s disease, J Alzheimer’s Dis, 69, 169, 10.3233/JAD-190056 · DOI
  8. Vogelgsang, 2018, Multiplex immunoassay measurement of amyloid-β 42 to amyloid-β 40 ratio in plasma discriminates between dementia due to Alzheimer's disease and dementia not due to Alzheimer's disease, Exp Brain Res, 236, 1241, 10.1007/s00221-018-5210-x · DOI
  9. 10.1059/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 · DOI
  10. Hedges L , Olkin I . Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York Academic Press, 1985.
  11. 10.1037//1082-989X.3.4.486 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Doecke, 2020, Total Aβ 42 /Aβ 40 ratio in plasma predicts amyloid-PET status, independent of clinical AD diagnosis, Neurology, 94, e1580, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009240 · DOI
  14. 10.1186/alzrt162 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.2111583 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/325733a0 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.741 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/psc.2789 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1136/jnnp.2006.100529 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01124-1 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-12-04833.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00070-3 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00530-1 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000046581.81650.D0 · DOI
  25. 10.1001/archneurol.2011.1841 · DOI
  26. Vergallo, 2019, Plasma amyloid β 40/42 ratio predicts cerebral amyloidosis in cognitively normal individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s disease, Alzheimer's & Dementia, 15, 764, 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.03.009 · DOI
  27. Pyun, 2021, Plasma amyloid-β oligomerization tendency predicts amyloid PET positivity, Clin Interv Aging, 16, 749, 10.2147/CIA.S312473 · DOI
  28. Chatterjee, 2019, Ultrasensitive detection of plasma amyloid-β as a biomarker for cognitively normal elderly individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease, J Alzheimers Dis, 71, 775, 10.3233/JAD-190533 · DOI
  29. 10.2183/pjab.90.353 · DOI
  30. 10.1186/s13195-019-0485-0 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Palmqvist, 2019, Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarker trajectories with increasing amyloid deposition in Alzheimer’s disease, EMBO Mol Med, 11, 1, 10.15252/emmm.201911170 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1186/s13195-016-0227-5 · DOI
  33. 10.1186/s13195-019-0485-0 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Schindler, 2019, High-precision plasma β-amyloid 42/40 predicts current and future brain amyloidosis, Neurology, 93, e1647, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008081 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1186/s13195-020-00619-0 · DOI
  36. West, 2021, A blood-based diagnostic test incorporating plasma Aβ42/40 ratio, ApoE proteotype, and age accurately identifies brain amyloid status: findings from a multi cohort validity analysis, Mol Neurodegener, 16, 1, 10.1186/s13024-021-00451-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, L., Li, W., Chen, Y., Lin, Y., Wang, B., Guo, Q., & Miao, Y.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Miao, Ya
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-03-03
Volume
93
Issue
5
Pages
513-520
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W4214934088
Cited by
36
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (19ZR1438800)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
plasma amyloid-beta, amyloid PET, Alzheimer's disease, blood biomarkers, Aβ40, amyloid-beta 42, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, amyloid-beta deposition, early diagnosis
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Peptide Fragments, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review