Cited by 567Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

ADVANCES IN NEUROPSYCHIATRY: Neuropsychiatry of frontal lobe dysfunction in violent and criminal behaviour: a critical review

Open access
Brower, M C·2001·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To establish the link between frontal lobe dysfunction and violent and criminal behaviour, based on a review of relevant literature. METHODS: Articles relating evidence of frontal lobe dysfunction with violence or crime were collected through a MEDLINE search using the keyword "frontal lobe" combined with the terms "aggression," "violence," "crime," "antisocial personality disorder," "psychopathy," "impulse control disorders", and "episodic dyscontrol." Reference lists were then searched for additional articles. RESULTS: High rates of neuropsychiatric abnormalities reported in persons with violent and criminal behaviour suggest an association between aggressive dyscontrol and brain injury, especially involving the frontal lobes. The studies reviewed support an association between frontal lobe dysfunction and increased aggressive and antisocial behaviour. Focal orbitofrontal injury is specifically associated with increased aggression. Deficits in frontal executive function may increase the likelihood of future aggression, but no study has reliably demonstrated a characteristic pattern of frontal network dysfunction predictive of violent crime. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant focal frontal lobe dysfunction is associated with aggressive dyscontrol, but the increased risk of violence seems less than is widely presumed. Evidence is strongest for an association between focal prefrontal damage and an impulsive subtype of aggressive behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.71.6.720

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Filley CM, Price BH, Nell V, et al. Toward an understanding of violence: neurobehavioral aspects of unwarranted physi- cal aggression. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 2001;14:1-4.
  2. Bear D, Freeman R, Greenberg M. Alterations in personal- ity associated with neurologic illnesses. Psychiatry 1985;1: 1-13.
  3. Kandel E, Freed D. Frontal-lobe dysfunction and antisocial behavior: a review. J Clin Psychol 1989;45:404-413.
  4. Deckel AW, Hesselbrock V, Bauer L. Antisocial personality disorder, childhood delinquency, and frontal brain functioning: EEG and neuropsychological findings. J Clin Psychol 1996;52:639-50.
  5. Lueger RJ, Gill KJ. Frontal-lobe cognitive dysfunction in conduct disorder adolescents. J Clin Psychol 1990;46:696- 706.
  6. Raine A, Meloy JR, Bihrle S, et al. Reduced prefrontal and increased subcortical brain functioning assessed using positron emission tomography in predatory and aVective murderers. Behav Sci Law 1998;16:319-32.
  7. Filley CM, Kelly JP, Price BH. Violence and the brain: an urgent need for research. Scientist 2001;15:39.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brower, M. C.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Brower, M C
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
720-726
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106080733
Cited by
567
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
frontal lobe dysfunction, violent behavior, criminal behavior, aggression, antisocial personality disorder, psychopathy, impulse control disorders, prefrontal executive function, brain injury, neuropsychiatric abnormalities
MeSH terms
Aggression, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Biological Psychiatry, Brain Diseases, Criminal Psychology, Criminology, Frontal Lobe, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Research Design, Risk Factors, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Violence, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Neurocognitive Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review