Cited by 696Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Frontal lobe injuries, violence, and aggression: A report of the Vietnam Head Injury Study

Grafman, J., Schwab, K., Warden, D., Pridgen, A., Brown, H. R., Salazar, A. M.·1996·Neurology

Abstract

Knowledge stored in the human prefrontal cortex may exert control over more primitive behavioral reactions to environmental provocation. Therefore, following frontal lobe lesions, patients are more likely to use physical intimidation or verbal threats in potential or actual confrontational situations. To test this hypothesis, we examined the relationship between frontal lobe lesions and the presence of aggressive and violent behavior. Fifty-seven normal controls and 279 veterans, matched for age, education, and time in Vietnam, who had suffered penetrating head injuries during their service in Vietnam, were studied. Family observations and self-reports were collected using scales and questionnaires that assessed a range of aggressive and violent attitudes and behavior. Two Aggression/Violence Scale scores, based on observer ratings, were constructed. The results indicated that patients with frontal ventromedial lesions consistently demonstrated Aggression/Violence Scale scores significantly higher than controls and patients with lesions in other brain areas. Higher Aggression/Violence Scale scores were generally associated with verbal confrontations rather than physical assaults, which were less frequently reported. The presence of aggressive and violent behaviors was not associated with the total size of the lesion nor whether the patient had seizures, but was associated with a disruption of family activities. These findings support the hypothesis that ventromedial frontal l…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.46.5.1231

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grafman, J., Schwab, K., Warden, D., Pridgen, A., Brown, H. R., & Salazar, A. M.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
1996-05
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
1231-1231
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2029600757
Cited by
696
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 38
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
frontal lobe lesions, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, aggression, violence, Vietnam War veterans, penetrating head injury, family breakdown
MeSH terms
Adult, Aggression, Analysis of Variance, Anger, Brain, Brain Injuries, Child, Depression, Family, Female, Frontal Lobe, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Military Personnel, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Inventory, Reference Values, Registries, Retrospective Studies, United States, Vietnam, Violence, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review