Cited by 864Long-Term Effects of COVID-19COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘Long-COVID’: a cross-sectional study of persisting symptoms, biomarker and imaging abnormalities following hospitalisation for COVID-19

Open access

Abstract

Large numbers of people are being discharged from hospital following COVID-19 without assessment of recovery. In 384 patients (mean age 59.9 years; 62% male) followed a median 54 days post discharge, 53% reported persistent breathlessness, 34% cough and 69% fatigue. 14.6% had depression. In those discharged with elevated biomarkers, 30.1% and 9.5% had persistently elevated d-dimer and C reactive protein, respectively. 38% of chest radiographs remained abnormal with 9% deteriorating. Systematic follow-up after hospitalisation with COVID-19 identifies the trajectory of physical and psychological symptom burden, recovery of blood biomarkers and imaging which could be used to inform the need for rehabilitation and/or further investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215818

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 860

Metadata

Authors
Mandal, S., Barnett, J., Brill, S. E., Brown, J. S., Denneny, E. K., Hare, S. S., Heightman, M., Hillman, T. E., Jacob, J., Jarvis, H. C., Lipman, M. C. I., Naidu, S. B., Nair, A., Porter, J. C., Tomlinson, G. S., & Hurst, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University College Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hurst, John R
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-11-10
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
396-398
ISSN
  • 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3296
OpenAlex
W3101401355
Cited by
864
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 181 · 2022: 263 · 2021: 235 · 2020: 6
FWCI
74.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (Z/17/Z, 209553, 209553/Z/17/Z)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Medical Research Council (MR/N007727/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
long COVID, persistent symptoms, dyspnea, cough, fatigue, depression, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, biomarkers, chest X-ray abnormalities, post-discharge follow-up, rehabilitation
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnostic Imaging, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Lung, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review