The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Signal Recovery by Proximal Forward-Backward Splitting
Abstract
We show that various inverse problems in signal recovery can be formulated as the generic problem of minimizing the sum of two convex functions with certain regularity properties. This formulation makes it possible to derive existence, uniqueness, characterization, and stability results in a unified and standardized fashion for a large class of apparently disparate problems. Recent results on monotone operator splitting methods are applied to establish the convergence of a forward-backward algorithm to solve the generic problem. In turn, we recover, extend, and provide a simplified analysis for a variety of existing iterative methods. Applications to geometry/texture image decomposition schemes are also discussed. A novelty of our framework is to use extensively the notion of a proximity operator, which was introduced by Moreau in the 1960s.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 75
- 10.5802/afst.541 · DOI
- 10.1137/S003614299529230X · DOI · Paper page
- Aubin Jean‐Pierre, 1990, Set‐valued analysis
- 10.1007/s10851-005-4783-8 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11263-005-4948-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF03007664 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.na.2004.07.054 · DOI
- J. Bect, L. Blanc‐Féraud, G. Aubert, and A. Chambolle, A 𝓁1‐unified variational framework for image restoration , in Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Computer Vision (Prague, 2004), Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 3024, T. Pajdla and J. Matas, eds., Springer‐Verlag, New York, 2004, pp. 1–13. · DOI
- 10.4153/CMB-1992-003-0 · DOI
- Butnariu Dan, 2003, J. Convex Anal., 10, 35
- 10.1088/0266-5611/18/2/310 · DOI
- 10.1109/TASSP.1986.1164990 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02142692 · DOI
- Censor Yair, 1997, Parallel optimization
- 10.1023/B:JMIV.0000011325.36760.1e · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/83.661182 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s002110050258 · DOI · Paper page
- Cohen Albert, 2003, Numerical analysis of wavelet methods
- 10.1109/5.214546 · DOI
- 10.1109/78.330356 · DOI
- P. L. Combettes, The convex feasibility problem in image recovery , in Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, Vol. 95, P. Hawkes, ed., Academic Press, New York, 1996, pp. 155–270. · DOI · Paper page
- P. L. Combettes, Convexité et signal , in Actes du Congrès de Mathématiques Appliquées et Industrielles SMAI'01, Pompadour, France, 2001, pp. 6–16.
- 10.1080/02331930412331327157 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/78.782189 · DOI
- Combettes Patrick, 2005, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal., 6, 117
- 10.1109/34.735804 · DOI
- 10.1142/S0219691304000688 · DOI
- 10.1002/cpa.20042 · DOI · Paper page
- Christine De Mol, Michel Defrise, A note on wavelet‐based inversion algorithms, Contemp. Math., Vol. 313, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002, 85–962003m:65090 · DOI
- 10.1088/0266-5611/12/5/005 · DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/81.3.425 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02032.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01630569208816489 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIP.2003.814255 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/713818946 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TCS.1985.1085777 · DOI
- Herman Gabor, 1980, Image reconstruction from projections
- 10.1137/S0363012997324338 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.na.2003.11.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/0025-5564(70)90148-3 · DOI
- 10.1109/TC.1973.5009169 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-94-010-9608-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00171-6 · DOI
- 10.1080/09500348714550241 · DOI
- 10.1016/0041-5553(66)90114-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TASSP.1983.1164246 · DOI
- Mallat Stéphane, 1998, A wavelet tour of signal processing
- 10.1109/23.873021 · DOI
- 10.1090/ulect/022 · DOI · Paper page
- Moreau Jean‐Jacques, 1962, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 255, 238
- Moreau Jean‐Jacques, 1962, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 255, 2897
- Moreau Jean‐Jacques, 1963, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 256, 1069
- 10.24033/bsmf.1625 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1137/S105262349629856X · DOI
- 10.1137/S1540345902413322 · DOI
- Papoulis Athanasios, 1962, The Fourier integral and its applications
- 10.1109/TCS.1975.1084118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/78.489050 · DOI
- 10.1137/0314056 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/78.709518 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20021571 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0165-1684(03)00150-6 · DOI
- Stark Henry, 1987, Image recovery: theory and application
- H. Stark and Y. Yang, Vector Space Projections: A Numerical Approach to Signal and Image Processing, Neural Nets, and Optics , Wiley, New York, 1998.
- 10.1088/0266-5611/9/6/011 · DOI
- Titterington D., 1985, Astronom. and Astrophys., 144, 381
- 10.1016/0016-0032(65)90209-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1025384832106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/B:JMIV.0000011316.54027.6a · DOI
- 10.1109/TCS.1978.1084541 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TMI.1982.4307555 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-247X(83)90180-4 · DOI
- 10.1142/5021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-4838-5 · DOI
Cited by
Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000016 · Cited by 17,075
A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080716542 · Cited by 11,952
Parikh, N., & Boyd, S. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Optimization · doi:10.1561/2400000003 · Cited by 4,102
Learning Deep CNN Denoiser Prior for Image Restoration
Zhang, K., Zuo, W., Gu, S., & Zhang, L. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.300 · Cited by 2,116
“, iterative shrinkage/thresholding algorithms ISTA [4, 14] and FISTA [3]) as long as there involves a denoising subproblem.”
MethodA New TwIST: Two-Step Iterative Shrinkage/Thresholding Algorithms for Image Restoration
Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Figueiredo, M. A. T. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.909319 · Cited by 2,064
Nonlocally Centralized Sparse Representation for Image Restoration
Dong, W., Zhang, L., Shi, G., & Li, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2235847 · Cited by 1,505
Fast Image Recovery Using Variable Splitting and Constrained Optimization
Afonso, M. V., Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Figueiredo, M. A. T. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2010.2047910 · Cited by 1,223
Conic Optimization via Operator Splitting and Homogeneous Self-Dual Embedding
O’Donoghue, B., Chu, E., Parikh, N., & Boyd, S. (2016) · Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications · doi:10.1007/s10957-016-0892-3 · Cited by 664
A Fast Total Variation Minimization Method for Image Restoration
Huang, Y., Ng, M. K., & Wen, Y.-W. (2008) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/070703533 · Cited by 218
Local spatial constraint and total variation for hyperspectral anomaly detection
Feng, R., Li, H., Wang, L., Zhong, Y., Zhang, L., & Zeng, T. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2021.3098814 · Cited by 46
Direct parametric reconstruction from undersampled (k,t)-space data in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI
Dikaios, N., Arridge, S., Hamy, V., Punwani, S., & Atkinson, D. (2014) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2014.05.001 · Cited by 40
EMG-Based Automatic Gesture Recognition Using Lipschitz-Regularized Neural Networks
Neacşu, A., Pesquet, J.-C., & Burileanu, C. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3635159 · Cited by 15
Sparsity-Aware Learning and Compressed Sensing: An Overview
Theodoridis, S., Kopsinis, Y., & Slavakis, K. (2014) · Academic Press Library in Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396502-8.00023-1 · Cited by 14
Hybrid Physical-Deep Learning Model for Astronomical Inverse Problems
Lanusse, F., Melchior, P., & Moolekamp, F. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.03980 · Cited by 9
Augmented distributed optimization for networked systems
Xu, J. (2019) · doi:10.32657/10356/68805 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Combettes, P. L., & Wajs, V. R.
- Venue
- Multiscale Modeling & Simulation
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1168-1200
- ISSN
- 1540-3459 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-3467
- OpenAlex
- W2006262045
- Cited by
- 2,678
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.