Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Variable effects of respiratory muscle training on cycle exercise performance in men and women

Guenette, Jordan A, Martens, Andrea M, Lee, Anne L, Tyler, Gradin D, Richards, Jennifer C, Foster, Glen E, Warburton, Darren E.R, Sheel, A William·2006·Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism

Abstract

Respiratory muscle training (RMT) has been proposed as an effective means to increase the strength of the inspiratory muscles and improve exercise performance. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of RMT on cycling time to exhaustion (TTE) and to determine any potential sex effect. We hypothesized that RMT would improve maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and TTE to a similar degreee in men and women. Males (n = 7; mean (± SD) age, 22.1 ± 1.5 y) and females (n = 8; mean (± SD) 24.5 ± 4.9 y) performed an incremental cycle test to determine maximal oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]O 2 max) (day 1), followed by a familiarization TTE (day 2) and baseline TTE (day 3) at 80% maximal work achieved during the [Formula: see text]O 2 max test. Subjects then completed 5 weeks of respiratory muscle training (RMT) (5 d/week, 2 sets of 30 inspirations against 50% MIP). Four training sessions per week were performed at home and the 5th was supervised, during which the threshold load was increased if necessary. Following RMT, subjects completed 2 TTE tests (days 4 and 5). MIP increased in each subject (37% ± 18%, P < 0.05). There was no difference between men (pre = -100 ± 20 vs. post = -140 ± 29 cmH 2 O) and women (pre = -90 ± 28 vs. post = -117 ± 28 cmH 2 O). Baseline TTE (male = 301 ± 122 s; female = 338 ± 98 s) was shorter in comparison with the best of the 2 TTE-post tests (male = 353 ± 68 s; female = 416 ± 116 s; P < 0.01), but not when compared with days 4 or 5 (P > 0.05). RMT increases MIP and may improve exercise performance; however, improvements are variable with no differences between men and women.Key words: constant-intensity exercise, dyspnea, factors limiting exercise, maximal inspiratory pressure, respiratory muscles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/h05-016

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 2002, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 166, 518, 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518 · DOI
  2. Boutellier U., 1992, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 64, 145, 10.1007/BF00717952 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Boutellier U., 1992, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 65, 347, 10.1007/BF00868139 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Fairbarn M.S., 1991, Int. J. Sports Med., 12, 66, 10.1055/s-2007-1024658 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Fuller D., 1996, J. Appl. Physiol., 80, 1495, 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.5.1495 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gething A.D., 2004, Br. J. Sports Med., 38, 730, 10.1136/bjsm.2003.007518 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Guenette J.A., 2004, Respir. Physiol. Neurbiol., 143, 37, 10.1016/j.resp.2004.07.004 · DOI
  8. Harms C.A., 1998, J. Physiol. (London), 507, 619, 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.619bt.x · DOI
  9. Jeukendrup A., 1996, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 28, 266, 10.1097/00005768-199602000-00017 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Markov G., 2001, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 85, 233, 10.1007/s004210100450 · DOI · Paper page
  11. McConnell A.K., 2004, Int. J. Sports Med., 25, 284, 10.1055/s-2004-815827 · DOI
  12. Mead J., 1980, Am. Rev. Respir. Dis., 121, 339
  13. Morgan D., 1987, Int. J. Sports Med., 8, 88, 10.1055/s-2008-1025647 · DOI · Paper page
  14. O'Donnell D.E., 1999, Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med., 160, 1804, 10.1164/ajrccm.160.6.9808134 · DOI
  15. Olfert I.M., 2004, J. Physiol. (London), 557, 529, 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.056887 · DOI
  16. Richards J.C., 2004, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 36, 1514, 10.1249/01.MSS.0000139898.30804.60 · DOI
  17. Rodman J.R., 2003, J. Appl. Physiol., 95, 1159, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00258.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Sheel A.W., 2002, Sports Med., 32, 567, 10.2165/00007256-200232090-00003 · DOI
  19. Sheel A.W., 2001, J. Physiol. (London), 537, 277, 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0277k.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Simon M., 2001, J. Appl. Physiol., 90, 1013, 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.3.1013 · DOI
  21. Sonetti D.A., 2001, Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol., 127, 185, 10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00250-X · DOI · Paper page
  22. Spengler C.M., 2000, News Physiol. Sci., 15, 101
  23. Spengler C.M., 1999, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol., 79, 299, 10.1007/s004210050511 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Stuessi C., 2001, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 84, 582, 10.1007/s004210100408 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Suzuki S., 1993, Chest, 104, 197, 10.1378/chest.104.1.197 · DOI
  26. Thurlbeck W.M., 1982, Thorax, 37, 564, 10.1136/thx.37.8.564 · DOI
  27. Volianitis S., 2001, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 33, 803, 10.1097/00005768-200105000-00020 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Walls J., 2002, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 87, 145, 10.1007/s00421-002-0600-x · DOI
  29. Williams J.S., 2002, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 34, 1194, 10.1097/00005768-200207000-00022 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Guenette, J. A., Martens, A. M., Lee, A. L., Tyler, G. D., Richards, J. C., Foster, G. E., Warburton, D. E. R., & Sheel, A. W.
Venue
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Published
2006-04-01
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
159-166
ISSN
  • 1715-5312
  • 1715-5320
Cited by
24
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.