Cited by 6Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological diseases and metabolism

Effects of ApoE4 and ApoE2 genotypes on subcortical magnetic susceptibility and microstructure in 27,535 participants from the UK Biobank

Open access
Nir, Talia M., Zhu, Alyssa H., Gari, Iyad Ba, Dixon, Daniel, Islam, Tasfiya, Villalon-Reina, Julio E., Medland, Sarah E., Thompson, Paul M. +1 more·2021·Biocomputing 2022

Abstract

Disrupted iron homeostasis is associated with several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), and may be partially modulated by genetic risk factors. Here we evaluated whether subcortical iron deposition is associated with ApoE genotype, which substantially affects risk for late-onset AD. We evaluated differences in subcortical quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), a type of MRI sensitive to cerebral iron deposition, between either ApoE4 (E3E4+E4E4) or ApoE2 (E2E3+E2E2) carriers and E3 homozygotes (E3E3) in 27,535 participants from the UK Biobank (age: 45-82 years). We found that ApoE4 carriers had higher hippocampal (d=0.036; p=0.012) and amygdalar (d=0.035; p=0.013) magnetic susceptibility, particularly individuals aged 65 years or older, while those carrying ApoE2 (which protects against AD) had higher QSM only in the hippocampus (d=0.05; p=0.006), particularly those under age 65. Secondary diffusion MRI microstructural associations in these regions revealed greater diffusivity and less diffusion restriction in E4 carriers, however no differences were detected in E2 carriers. Disease risk conferred by ApoE4 may be linked with higher subcortical iron burden in conjunction with inflammation or neuronal loss in aging individuals, while ApoE2 associations may not necessarily reflect unhealthy iron deposits earlier in life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/9789811250477_0012

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent investigations have interrogated cortical or subcortical gray matter with inconclusive findings.

    “more recent investigations have interrogated cortical or subcortical gray matter with inconclusive findings [9, 10].”

    From Effects of APOE2 and APOE4 on brain microstructure in older adults: modification by age, sex, and cognitive status (2024) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Methods and Discussion (pages unavailable in our copy) show that this study investigated subcortical gray matter, and the Discussion notes inconsistent effects on diffusion metrics and a need for replication. But it also reports an association between ApoE4 and higher subcortical iron burden; it does not characterize its overall findings as inconclusive or investigate cortical gray matter. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nir, T. M., Zhu, A. H., Gari, I. B., Dixon, D., Islam, T., Villalon-Reina, J. E., Medland, S. E., Thompson, P. M., & Jahanshad, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Imaging Genetics Center, Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, California, 90292, USA
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
Venue
Biocomputing 2022
Published
2021-11-28
Volume
27
Pages
121-132
OpenAlex
W4200148621
Cited by
6
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.89
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG059874, T32AG058507, P30AG066530, U01AG068057)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P41EB015922)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological diseases and metabolism
Keywords
APOE ε4, APOE2, APOE genotype, quantitative susceptibility mapping, hippocampus, amygdala, Alzheimer's disease risk, iron homeostasis, brain aging, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Genotype, United Kingdom, Humans, Middle Aged, Biological Specimen Banks, Computational Biology, Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein E2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review