Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays

Forlines, Clifton, Wigdor, Daniel, Shen, Chia, Balakrishnan, Ravin·2007·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
DOI 10.1145/1240624.1240726
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We investigate the differences -- in terms of bothquantitative performance and subjective preference -- between direct-touch and mouse input for unimanual andbimanual tasks on tabletop displays. The results of twoexperiments show that for bimanual tasks performed ontabletops, users benefit from direct-touch input. However,our results also indicate that mouse input may be moreappropriate for a single user working on tabletop tasksrequiring only single-point interaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1240624.1240726

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1145/258549.258760 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1145/642611.642631 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1145/320719.322599 · DOI
  4. 10.1145/332040.332404 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/1124772.1124963 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.5555/647402.725582 · doi:10.5555/647402.725582
  7. 10.1145/22627.22390 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Card , S. , English , W. , and Burr , B . ( 1978 ). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21 . p. 601 -- 613 . Card, S., English, W., and Burr, B. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21. p. 601--613.
  9. Czerwinski , M. , Smith , G. , Regan , T. , Meyers , B. , Robertson , G. , and Starkweather , G . ( 2003 ). Toward characterizing the productivity benefits of very large displays . Interact Conference. p. 9 -- 16 . Czerwinski, M., Smith, G., Regan, T., Meyers, B., Robertson, G., and Starkweather, G. (2003). Toward characterizing the productivity benefits of very large displays. Interact Conference. p. 9--16.
  10. 10.1145/1133265.1133289 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/634067.634254 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/00222895.1987.10735426 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Guiard , Y. , and Ferrand , T . ( 1995 ). Asymmetry in bimanual skills . in Manual asymmetries in motor performance , Elliott and Roy, Editors. CRC Press . Guiard, Y., and Ferrand, T. (1995). Asymmetry in bimanual skills. in Manual asymmetries in motor performance, Elliott and Roy, Editors. CRC Press.
  14. 10.1145/1096737.1096741 · DOI
  15. 10.1145/288392.288572 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/292834.292849 · DOI
  17. 10.1145/258549.258571 · DOI
  18. 10.1145/259963.260425 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0096-1523.5.2.229 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1145/258549.258574 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/1095034.1095057 · DOI
  22. 10.1145/1124772.1124825 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/300520.300522 · DOI
  24. MacKenzie , S. ( 1992 ). Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7 . p. 91 -- 139 . MacKenzie, S. (1992). Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7. p. 91--139.
  25. 10.1145/142750.142794 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1145/108844.108868 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1145/765891.765974 · DOI
  28. Marteniuk , R. , MacKenzie , C. , and Baba , D . ( 1984 ). Bimanual movement control: Information Processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A . p. 335 -- 365 . Marteniuk, R., MacKenzie, C., and Baba, D. (1984). Bimanual movement control: Information Processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A. p. 335--365.
  29. 10.1145/259963.260468 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/258734.258747 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.5555/1089508.1089512 · doi:10.5555/1089508.1089512
  32. 10.1007/11555261_10 · DOI
  33. 10.1109/MCG.2006.107 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0020-7373(91)90037-8 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1109/52.73754 · DOI
  36. 10.1145/964696.964718 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1145/253284.253316 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.006 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Shen, C., & Balakrishnan, R.
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2007-04-29
Pages
647-656
DOI
10.1145/1240624.1240726
OpenAlex
W2102005779
Cited by
377
References
1
FWCI
22.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.