The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI
Abstract
With the recent growth in sustainable HCI, now is a good time to map out the approaches being taken and the intellectual commitments that underlie the area, to allow for community discussion about where the field should go. Here, we provide an empirical analysis of how sustainable HCI is defining itself as a research field. Based on a corpus of published works, we identify (1) established genres in the area, (2) key unrecognized intellectual differences, and (3) emerging issues, including urgent avenues for further exploration, opportunities for interdisciplinary engagement, and key topics for debate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability
Brynjarsdottir, H., Håkansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., DiSalvo, C., & Sengers, P. (2012) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208539 · Cited by 483
Self-citationIntersectional HCI: Engaging Identity through Gender, Race, and Class
Schlesinger, A., Edwards, W. K., & Grinter, R. E. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025766 · Cited by 449
ICT for Sustainability: An Emerging Research Field
Hilty, L. M., & Aebischer, B. (2015) · Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_1 · Cited by 388
Reviewing reflection: on the use of reflection in interactive system design
Baumer, E. P. S., Khovanskaya, V., Matthews, M., Reynolds, L., Schwanda Sosik, V., & Gay, G. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems · doi:10.1145/2598510.2598598 · Cited by 266
A Qualitative Exploration of Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness
Woodruff, A., Fox, S. E., Rousso-Schindler, S., & Warshaw, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174230 · Cited by 256
Negotiating food waste: Using a practice lens to inform design
Ganglbauer, E., Fitzpatrick, G., & Comber, R. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2463579.2463582 · Cited by 239
Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2020) · Energy Informatics · doi:10.1186/s42162-020-00130-8 · Cited by 224
Large-scale Text-to-Image Generation Models for Visual Artists’ Creative Works
Ko, H.-K., Park, G., Jeon, H., Jo, J., Kim, J., & Seo, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3581641.3584078 · Cited by 189
A Decade of Sustainable HCI: Connecting SHCI to the Sustainable Development Goals
Hansson, L. Å. E. J., Cerratto Pargman, T., & Pargman, D. S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445069 · Cited by 148
Sustainability and ICT - An overview of the field
Hilty, L., Lohmann, W., & Huang, E. M. (2011) · Tipolito Subalpina · doi:10.5167/uzh-55640 · Cited by 134
Preist, C., Schien, D., & Blevis, E. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858378 · Cited by 133
“As noted in diSalvo et al. [13], research on sustainability in design has focused primarily on the issue of material use and waste reduction associated with interactive devices.”
InfluentialNardi, B., Tomlinson, B., Patterson, D. J., Chen, J., Pargman, D., Raghavan, B., & Penzenstadler, B. (2018) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3183582 · Cited by 115
Prescriptive persuasion and open-ended social awareness: expanding the design space of mobile health
Baumer, E. P. S., Katz, S. J., Freeman, J. E., Adams, P., Gonzales, A. L., Pollak, J., Retelny, D., Niederdeppe, J., Olson, C. M., & Gay, G. K. (2012) · Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work · doi:10.1145/2145204.2145279 · Cited by 107
Beyond Dyadic Interactions: Considering Chatbots as Community Members
Seering, J., Luria, M., Kaufman, G., & Hammer, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300680 · Cited by 97
Health promotion as activism: building community capacity to effect social change
Parker, A., Kantroo, V., Lee, H. R., Osornio, M., Sharma, M., & Grinter, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2207692 · Cited by 84
Ahmed, S. I., Haque, M. R., Guha, S., Rifat, M. R., & Dell, N. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025961 · Cited by 83
Insolvent: How to Reorient Computing for Just Sustainability
Becker, C. (2023) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14668.001.0001 · Cited by 56
Environmental Metrics: The Main Opportunity from ICT for Industrial Ecology
Zapico, J. L., Brandt, N., & Turpeinen, M. (2010) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00272.x · Cited by 43
Designing Home Automation Routines Using an LLM-Based Chatbot
Giudici, M., Padalino, L., Paolino, G., Paratici, I., Pascu, A. I., & Garzotto, F. (2024) · Designs · doi:10.3390/designs8030043 · Cited by 40
Sustainable food systems with ICT
Svenfelt, A., & Zapico, J. L. (2016) · Proceedings of ICT for Sustainability 2016 · doi:10.2991/ict4s-16.2016.23 · Cited by 35
Alves Villarinho Lima, B., & Almeida, L. D. A. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77431-8_23 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., & Brynjarsdóttir, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-04-10
- Pages
- 1975-1984
- OpenAlex
- W2104113460
- Cited by
- 783
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.53
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
