Cited by 343Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionDigitalization, Law, and RegulationCultural Differences and Values

Values, personal information privacy, and regulatory approaches

Open access
Milberg, Sandra J., Burke, Sandra J., Smith, H. Jeff, Kallman, Ernest A.·1995·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

The relationships among nationality, cultural values, personal information privacy concerns, and information privacy regulation are examined in this article.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/219663.219683

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar to this study and to the typologies, Milberg, Burke, Smith, and Kallman (1995) also found concern about privacy to be high in all nine countries they studied.

    “Similar to this study and to the typologies, Milberg, Burke, Smith, and Kallman (1995) also found concern about privacy to be high in all nine countries they studied.”

    From A global perspective on library association codes of ethics (2005) · cites this paper as Milberg, Burke, Smith, and Kallman (1995)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. C COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM December 1995/Vol. 38, No. 12
  2. Hofstede, G. Cultures and Organizations. McGraw-Hill, Berk- shire, England, 1991.
  3. Stone, E.F. and Stone, D.L. Privacy in organizations: Theoreti- cal issues, research findings, and protection mechanisms. Res. Pers. Hum. Resource Manage. 8 (1990), 349-411.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milberg, S. J., Burke, S. J., Smith, H. J., & Kallman, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Bentley University (US)
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
1995-12
Volume
38
Issue
12
Pages
65-74
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2059311829
Cited by
343
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
data privacy, cultural values, nationality, privacy concerns, cross-cultural comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review