The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 171 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey on concept drift adaptation
Open accessAbstract
Concept drift primarily refers to an online supervised learning scenario when the relation between the input data and the target variable changes over time. Assuming a general knowledge of supervised learning in this article, we characterize adaptive learning processes; categorize existing strategies for handling concept drift; overview the most representative, distinct, and popular techniques and algorithms; discuss evaluation methodology of adaptive algorithms; and present a set of illustrative applications. The survey covers the different facets of concept drift in an integrated way to reflect on the existing scattered state of the art. Thus, it aims at providing a comprehensive introduction to the concept drift adaptation for researchers, industry analysts, and practitioners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“particularly as the phenomena the AI system is modelling are likely to change over time, and the risks and impacts may change with them.”
From Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making (2025) · cites this paper as Gama et al 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“It might be that some relevant records are not presented to the reviewer because the text used in the abstract is not seen as potentially relevant because of concept ambiguity [11, 17], which can make finding relevant records challenging.”
From The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Records can be hard to find due to concept ambiguity, the different angles from which a subject can be studied, and changes in the meaning of a concept over time, known as concept drift (Chen et al., 2012; Gama et al., 2014).”
From Active learning-based systematic reviewing using switching classification models: the case of the onset, maintenance, and relapse of depressive disorders (2023) · cites this paper as Gama et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“Lwakatare et al. [15] and Kim et al. [40] reported the difficulty of specifying desirable datasets.”
From Software engineering challenges for machine learning applications: A literature review (2020) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Developing the skill set for ML applications is the major challenge related to this KA [15,16,27,32,39,40,59].”
From Software engineering challenges for machine learning applications: A literature review (2020) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,190
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,867
Seel, N. M. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_5195 · Cited by 19,482
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.
Rosenblatt, F. (1958) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042519 · Cited by 12,280
Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets
Demšar, J. (2006) · doi:10.5555/1248547.1248548 · Cited by 12,041
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Classification And Regression Trees
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315139470 · Cited by 11,417
Adomavičius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2005.99 · Cited by 10,539
A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control
Dunnett, C. W. (1955) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1955.10501294 · Cited by 6,097
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 171 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1002/sam.v2:5/6 · DOI
- 10.5555/647458.728399 · DOI
- 10.5555/1662648.1662650 · DOI
- 10.5555/1293846.1293848 · DOI
- 10.5555/3120828.3120894 · DOI
- 10.1002/rob.v23:9 · DOI
- A. Wald . 1947. Sequential Analysis . John Wiley and Sons . A. Wald. 1947. Sequential Analysis. John Wiley and Sons.
- 10.5555/2010989.2010997 · DOI
- 10.5555/2050236.2050265 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Machine learning and deep learning
Janiesch, C., Zschech, P., & Heinrich, K. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2 · Cited by 2,959
Recommender system application developments: A survey
Jie Lu, B., Wu, D., Mao, M., Wang, W., & Zhang, G. (2015) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.03.008 · Cited by 1,584
Explaining Deep Neural Networks and Beyond: A Review of Methods and Applications
Samek, W., Montavon, G., Lapuschkin, S., Anders, C. J., & Muller, K.-R. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3060483 · Cited by 1,477
“measurement artifacts or adversarial perturbations [182]; 2) resilience to drifting data distributions [49]; 3) ability to accurately assess the confidence of its own predictions [135], [139]; 4) safety and security aspects [21], [26], [84], [193]; 5) legal requirements or adherence to social norms [54], [60]; 6) abil…”
BackgroundA Review on Outlier/Anomaly Detection in Time Series Data
Blázquez-García, A., Conde, A., Mori, U., & Lozano, J. A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3444690 · Cited by 1,102
Ensemble learning for data stream analysis: A survey
Krawczyk, B., Minku, L. L., Gama, J., Stefanowski, J., & Woźniak, M. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.004 · Cited by 1,050
Self-citationMachine learning with big data: challenges and approaches.
L'Heureux, A., Grolinger, K., Elyamany, H. F., & Capretz, M. A. M. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2696365 · Cited by 1,023
Unsupervised real-time anomaly detection for streaming data
Ahmad, S., Lavin, A., Purdy, S., & Agha, Z. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.04.070 · Cited by 1,004
Learning under Concept Drift: A Review
Lu, J., Liu, A., Dong, F., Gu, F., Gama, J., & Zhang, G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2876857 · Cited by 1,603
Self-citationAdaptive random forests for evolving data stream classification
Gomes, H. M., Bifet, A., Read, J., Barddal, J. P., Enembreck, F., Pfharinger, B., Holmes, G., & Abdessalem, T. (2017) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-017-5642-8 · Cited by 883
Self-citationLearning in Nonstationary Environments: A Survey
Ditzler, G., Roveri, M., Alippi, C., & Robi Polikar, A. (2015) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2015.2471196 · Cited by 833
Anomaly Detection for IoT Time-Series Data: A Survey
Cook, A. A., Mısırlı, G., & Fan, Z. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2958185 · Cited by 834
Fraud detection system: A survey
Abdallah, A., Maarof, M. A., & Zainal, A. B. (2016) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2016.04.007 · Cited by 840
O’Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J., Miwa, M., & Ananiadou, S. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-5 · Cited by 681
Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Realistic Modeling and a Novel Learning Strategy
Pozzolo, A. D., Boracchi, G., Caelen, O., Alippi, C., & Bontempi, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2017.2736643 · Cited by 821
Challenges in deploying machine learning: A survey of case studies
Paleyes, A., Urma, R.-G., & Lawrence, N. D. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3533378 · Cited by 638
Gibert, D., Mateu, C., & Planes, J. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2019.102526 · Cited by 646
Financial Fraud: A Review of Anomaly Detection Techniques and Recent Advances
Hilal, W., Gadsden, S. A., & Yawney, J. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116429 · Cited by 807
Computational Intelligence and Financial Markets: A Survey and Future Directions
Cavalcante, R. C., Brasileiro, R. C., Souza, V. L. F., Nobrega, J. P., & Oliveira, A. L. I. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.02.006 · Cited by 610
A Survey on Ensemble Learning for Data Stream Classification
Gomes, H. M., Barddal, J. P., Enembreck, F., & Bifet, A. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3054925 · Cited by 579
Self-citationDiez-Olivan, A., Del Ser, J., Galar, D., & Sierra, B. (2019) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.10.005 · Cited by 633
Webb, G. I., Hyde, R., Cao, H., Nguyen, H. L., & Petitjean, F. (2016) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-015-0448-4 · Cited by 541
Evaluating time series forecasting models: an empirical study on performance estimation methods
Cerqueira, V., Torgo, L., & Mozetič, I. (2020) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-020-05910-7 · Cited by 685
A survey on data preprocessing for data stream mining: Current status and future directions
Ramírez-Gallego, S., Krawczyk, B., García, S., Woźniak, M., & Herrera, F. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.078 · Cited by 502
Online and Non-Parametric Drift Detection Methods Based on Hoeffding’s Bounds
Blanco, I. I. F., del Campo-Ávila, J., Ramos-Jiménez, G., Morales-Bueno, R., Díaz, A. A. O., & Caballero-Mota, Y. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2014.2345382 · Cited by 470
Veale, M., Van Kleek, M., & Binns, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174014 · Cited by 490
“t shifts in distributions potentially relevant to a modelling task. Concept drift detection, particularly in complex real-world contexts, is difficult and daunting theoretically, let alone practically [65,28]. Some of the more recent reviews in the field call for the integration of domain knowledge in order to discern r…”
BackgroundFactSheets: Increasing trust in AI services through supplier's declarations of conformity
Arnold, M., Bellamy, R. K. E., Hind, M., Houde, S., Mehta, S., Mojsilović, A., Nair, R., Ramamurthy, K. N., Olteanu, A., Piorkowski, D., et al. (2019) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2019.2942288 · Cited by 434
Social media big data analytics: A survey
Ghani, N. B. A., Hamid, S. B., Hashem, M., & Ahmed, E. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.039 · Cited by 468
From concept drift to model degradation: An overview on performance-aware drift detectors
Bayram, F., Ahmed, B. S., & Kassler, A. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108632 · Cited by 419
Incremental on-line learning: A review and comparison of state of the art algorithms
Losing, V., Hammer, B., & Wersing, H. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.06.084 · Cited by 382
An Overview of Concept Drift Applications
Žliobaitė, I., Pechenizkiy, M., & da Gama, J. M. P. (2015) · Studies in big data · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26989-4_4 · Cited by 396
Self-citationA Review of Android Malware Detection Approaches Based on Machine Learning
Liu, K., Xu, S., Xu, G., Zhang, M., Sun, D., & Liu, H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3006143 · Cited by 410
Mental health monitoring with multimodal sensing and machine learning: A survey
Garcia-Ceja, E., Riegler, M., Nordgreen, T., Jakobsen, P., Oedegaard, K. J., & Tørresen, J. (2018) · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2018.09.003 · Cited by 356
A Review of Single-Source Deep Unsupervised Visual Domain Adaptation
Zhao, S., Yue, X., Zhang, S., Li, B., Zhao, H., Wu, B., Krishna, R., Gonzalez, J. E., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. L., Seshia, S. A., et al. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.3028503 · Cited by 361
O’Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J., Miwa, M., & Ananiadou, S. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0031-5 · Cited by 353
Online Deep Learning: Learning Deep Neural Networks on the Fly
Sahoo, D., Pham, Q., Lu, J. J., & Hoi, S. C. H. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/369 · Cited by 385
A Systematic Study of Online Class Imbalance Learning With Concept Drift
Wang, S., Minku, L. L., & Yao, X. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2017.2771290 · Cited by 337
Škrjanc, I., Iglesias, J. A., Sanchis, A., Leite, D. F., Lughofer, E. D., & Gomide, F. A. C. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.03.060 · Cited by 329
Challenges to IoT-Enabled Predictive Maintenance for Industry 4.0
Compare, M., Baraldi, P., & Zio, E. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2957029 · Cited by 311
Spiking Neural Networks and online learning: An overview and perspectives
Lobo, J. L., Ser, J. D., Bifet, A., & Kasabov, N. K. (2019) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.09.004 · Cited by 314
Self-citationOpen challenges for data stream mining research
Krempl, G., Žliobaitė, I., Brzeziński, D., Hüllermeier, E., Last, M., Lemaire, V., Noack, T., Shaker, A., Sievi, S., Spiliopoulou, M., et al. (2014) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/2674026.2674028 · Cited by 295
Self-citationForecast evaluation for data scientists: common pitfalls and best practices
Hewamalage, H., Ackermann, K., & Bergmeir, C. (2022) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-022-00894-5 · Cited by 408
Online Incremental Machine Learning Platform for Big Data-Driven Smart Traffic Management
Nallaperuma, D., Nawaratne, R., Bandaragoda, T., Adikari, A., Nguyen, S., Kempitiya, T., Silva, D. D., Alahakoon, D., & Pothuhera, D. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2019.2924883 · Cited by 344
Proceedings of the 19th Python in Science Conference
(2020) · Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences · doi:10.25080/majora-342d178e-02b · Cited by 285
Digital Twins in Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing: A Literature Review
Chen, Y., Yang, O., Sampat, C., Bhalode, P., Ramachnadran, R., & Ierapetritou, M. (2020) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr8091088 · Cited by 295
An effective intrusion detection framework based on SVM with feature augmentation
Wang, H., Gu, J., & Wang, S. (2017) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2017.09.014 · Cited by 282
Algorithms that remember: model inversion attacks and data protection law
Veale, M., Binns, R., & Edwards, L. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0083 · Cited by 278
Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration
Concas, F., Mineraud, J., Lagerspetz, E., Varjonen, S., Liu, X., Puolamäki, K., Nurmi, P., & Tarkoma, S. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks · doi:10.1145/3446005 · Cited by 329
SCARFF : A scalable framework for streaming credit card fraud detection with spark
Carcillo, F., Pozzolo, A. D., Borgne, Y. L., Caelen, O., Mazzer, Y., & Bontempi, G. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.005 · Cited by 272
Machine learning for streaming data
Gomes, H. M., Read, J., Bifet, A., Barddal, J. P., & da Gama, J. M. P. (2019) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3373464.3373470 · Cited by 291
Self-citationData drift in medical machine learning: implications and potential remedies
Sahiner, B., Chen, W., Samala, R. K., & Petrick, N. (2023) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20220878 · Cited by 279
KNN Classifier with Self Adjusting Memory for Heterogeneous Concept Drift
Losing, V., Hammer, B., & Wersing, H. (2016) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2016.0040 · Cited by 260
Fernandes, M., Corchado, J. M., & Marreiros, G. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03344-3 · Cited by 274
Incremental knowledge base construction using DeepDive
Shin, J., Wu, S., Wang, F., De, C., Zhang, C., & Ré, C. (2015) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/2809974.2809991 · Cited by 245
Concept Drift Detection in Data Stream Mining : A literature review
Agrahari, S., & Singh, A. K. (2021) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.11.006 · Cited by 235
Ranking in evolving complex networks
Liao, H., Mariani, M. S., Medo, M., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, M.-Y. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.05.001 · Cited by 239
Discussion and review on evolving data streams and concept drift adapting
Khamassi, I., Sayed-Mouchaweh, M., Hammami, M., & Ghédira, K. (2016) · Evolving Systems · doi:10.1007/s12530-016-9168-2 · Cited by 224
Learning Domain-Invariant Subspace Using Domain Features and Independence Maximization
Yan, K., Kou, L., & Zhang, D. D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2016.2633306 · Cited by 220
Ranking in evolving complex networks
Liao, H., Mariani, M. S., Medo, M., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, M. (2017) · reroDoc Digital Library · Cited by 221
RDDM: Reactive drift detection method
de Barros, R. S. M., Cabral, D. R. D. L., Gonçalves, P. M., & Santos, S. G. T. D. C. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.023 · Cited by 210
Challenges in benchmarking stream learning algorithms with real-world data
Souza, V. M. A., dos Reis, D. M., Maletzke, A. G., & Batista, G. E. A. P. A. (2020) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-020-00698-5 · Cited by 206
Challenges in data-driven geospatial modeling for environmental research and practice
Koldasbayeva, D., Tregubova, P., Gasanov, M. E., Zaytsev, A., Petrovskaia, A., & Burnaev, E. V. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55240-8 · Cited by 254
Continual Prototype Evolution: Learning Online from Non-Stationary Data Streams
Lange, M. D., & Tuytelaars, T. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00814 · Cited by 210
Data Quality for Software Vulnerability Datasets
Croft, R., Babar, M. A., & Kholoosi, M. M. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00022 · Cited by 232
Kappa Updated Ensemble for drifting data stream mining
Cano, A., & Krawczyk, B. (2019) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-019-05840-z · Cited by 185
Smart grid load forecasting using online support vector regression
Vrablecová, P., Ezzeddine, A. B., Rozinajová, V., Šárik, S., & Sangaiah, A. K. (2017) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.07.006 · Cited by 186
Incremental Learning in Online Scenario
He, J., Mao, R., Shao, Z., & Zhu, F. M. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01394 · Cited by 188
Robust Online Time Series Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networks
Guo, T., Zhao, X., Yao, X., Chen, H., Aberer, K., & Funaya, K. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa.2016.92 · Cited by 185
An Overview on Concept Drift Learning
Iwashita, A. S., & Papa, J. P. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2886026 · Cited by 179
Dependable Intrusion Detection System for IoT: A Deep Transfer Learning Based Approach
Mehedi, S. T., Anwar, A., Rahman, Z., Ahmed, K., & Islam, R. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2022.3164770 · Cited by 204
Artificial intelligence and machine learning
Kühl, N., Schemmer, M., Goutier, M., & Satzger, G. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00598-0 · Cited by 242
Reactive Soft Prototype Computing for Concept Drift Streams
Raab, C., Heusinger, M., & Schleif, F.-M. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.111 · Cited by 177
BODMAS: An Open Dataset for Learning based Temporal Analysis of PE Malware
Yang, L., Ciptadi, A., Laziuk, I., Ahmadzadeh, A., & Wang, G. (2021) · IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) · doi:10.1109/spw53761.2021.00020 · Cited by 177
Intrusion Detection in the IoT Under Data and Concept Drifts: Online Deep Learning Approach
Abdel Wahab, O. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3167005 · Cited by 190
Online Ensemble Learning of Data Streams with Gradually Evolved Classes
Sun, Y., Tang, K., Minku, L. L., Wang, S., & Yao, X. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2016.2526675 · Cited by 177
Temporal quality degradation in AI models
Jarquin, D. V., Sharp, A., Zhang, R., Nguyen, T., Hoang, A. T., & Pianykh, O. S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-15245-z · Cited by 216
Detection of calibration drift in clinical prediction models to inform model updating
Davis, S. E., Greevy, R. A., Lasko, T. A., Walsh, C. G., & Matheny, M. E. (2020) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103611 · Cited by 160
Fast Hoeffding Drift Detection Method for Evolving Data Streams
Pesaranghader, A., & Viktor, H. L. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46227-1_7 · Cited by 169
Artificial Intelligence Governance For Businesses
Schneider, J., Abraham, R., Meske, C., & Brocke, J. V. (2022) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2022.2085825 · Cited by 273
Data stream clustering: a review
Zubaroğlu, A., & Atalay, V. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09874-x · Cited by 167
A large-scale comparison of concept drift detectors
de Barros, R. S. M., & Santos, S. G. T. D. C. (2018) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.04.014 · Cited by 164
New Directions in Automated Traffic Analysis
Holland, J., Schmitt, P., Feamster, N., & Mittal, P. (2020) · Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3460120.3484758 · Cited by 212
Monitoring the public opinion about the vaccination topic from tweets analysis
D’Andrea, E., Ducange, P., Bechini, A., Renda, A., & Marcelloni, F. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.09.009 · Cited by 169
Sadler, J. M., Goodall, J. L., Morsy, M. M., & Spencer, K. (2018) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.044 · Cited by 162
A survey on machine learning for recurring concept drifting data streams
Suárez‐Cetrulo, A. L., Quintana, D., & Cervantes, A. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118934 · Cited by 160
Kneib, M., & Huth, C. (2018) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/3243734.3243751 · Cited by 156
Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making
Borgesius, F. Z. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.13465 · Cited by 152
Soleymani, F., & Paquet, E. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113456 · Cited by 170
Towards Fairness-Aware Federated Learning
Shi, Y., Yu, H., & Leung, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3263594 · Cited by 163
Streaming Random Patches for Evolving Data Stream Classification
Gomes, H. M., Read, J., & Bifet, A. (2019) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2019.00034 · Cited by 151
Self-citationOpen-environment machine learning
Zhou, Z. (2022) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwac123 · Cited by 162
SAMOA: scalable advanced massive online analysis
Morales, G. D. F., & Bifet, A. (2015) · Cited by 148
Self-citationOn Distributed Fuzzy Decision Trees for Big Data
Segatori, A., Marcelloni, F., & Pedrycz, W. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2016.2646746 · Cited by 145
Jain, M., Kaur, G., & Saxena, V. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116510 · Cited by 161
An overview of unsupervised drift detection methods
Gemaque, R. N., Costa, A. F. J., Giusti, R., & Santos, E. M. D. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1381 · Cited by 143
Statistical Features-Based Real-Time Detection of Drifted Twitter Spam
Chen, C., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Xiang, Y., Zhou, W., & Min, G. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2016.2621888 · Cited by 141
Concept Drift Adaptation by Exploiting Historical Knowledge
Sun, Y., Tang, K., Zhu, Z., & Yao, X. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2017.2775225 · Cited by 141
Heuristic design of fuzzy inference systems: A review of three decades of research
Ojha, V., Abraham, A., & Snåšel, V. (2019) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2019.08.010 · Cited by 149
Targeting Prospective Customers: Robustness of Machine-Learning Methods to Typical Data Challenges
Simester, D., Timoshenko, A., & Zoumpoulis, S. I. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3308 · Cited by 133
Credit card fraud detection and concept-drift adaptation with delayed supervised information
Pozzolo, A. D., Boracchi, G., Caelen, O., Alippi, C., & Bontempi, G. (2015) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2015.7280527 · Cited by 135
Boetje, J., & van de Schoot, R. (2024) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-024-02502-7 · Cited by 146
“It might be that some relevant records are not presented to the reviewer because the text used in the abstract is not seen as potentially relevant because of concept ambiguity [11, 17], which can make finding relevant records challenging.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A.
- Affiliations
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (FI)
- Yahoo (Spain) (ES)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Bournemouth University (GB)
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-37
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2099419573
- Cited by
- 3,735
- References
- 171
- Citations by year
- 2026: 688 · 2025: 435 · 2024: 296 · 2023: 345 · 2022: 306 · 2021: 367 · 2020: 327 · 2019: 281 · 2018: 229 · 2017: 197 · 2016: 137 · 2015: 96 · 2014: 27
- FWCI
- 151.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (submittedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Seventh Framework Programme (251617, ICT-2013-612944)
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- COMPETE Program
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Suomen Akatemia (118653)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- concept drift, online supervised learning, adaptive learning, adaptive algorithms, algorithm evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
