Cited by 93Online Learning and AnalyticsEducational Innovations and ChallengesBig Data and Business Intelligence

The SHEILA Framework: Informing Institutional Strategies and Policy Processes of Learning Analytics

Open access
Tsai, Yi-Shan, Moreno-Marcos, Pedro Manuel, Jivet, Ioana, Scheffel, Maren, Tammets, Kairit, Kollom, Kaire, Gašević, Dragan·2018·Journal of Learning Analytics

Abstract

This paper introduces a learning analytics policy and strategy framework developed by a cross-European research project team — SHEILA (Supporting Higher Education to Integrate Learning Analytics), based on interviews with 78 senior managers from 51 European higher education institutions across 16 countries. The framework was developed adapting the RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach (ROMA), which is designed to develop effective strategies and evidence-based policy in complex environments. This paper presents four case studies to illustrate the development process of the SHEILA framework and how it can be used iteratively to inform strategic planning and policy processes in real world environments, particularly for large-scale implementation in higher education contexts. To this end, the selected cases were analyzed at two stages, each a year apart, to investigate the progression of adoption approaches that were followed to solve existing challenges, and identify new challenges that could be addressed by following the SHEILA framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18608/jla.2018.53.2

Cites

28 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other frameworks proposed for learning analytics are the LALA framework with institutional, technological, ethical, and community dimensions, the Rapid Outcome Mapping Approach (ROMA), and the SHEILA Framework.

    “Moreover, other frameworks proposed for LA are the LALA framework consisting of four dimensions: (1) institutional, (2) technological, (3) ethical, and (4) community [82], Rapid Outcome Mapping Approach (ROMA) [83], the SHEILA Framework [84].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Long, P. D., Siemens, G., Conole, G., & Gašević, D. (Eds.). (2011). Proceedings of the 1 st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ʼ11), 27 February-1 March 2011, Banff, AB, Canada. New York: ACM.
  2. Young, J., & Mendizabal, E. (2009). Helping researchers become policy entrepreneurs: How to develop engagement strategies for evidence-based policy-making. ODI Briefing Papers (pp. 1-4). London, UK: Overseas Development Institute. http://www.alnap.org/resource/8431

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, Y.-S., Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Tammets, K., Kollom, K., & Gašević, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
  • Tallinn University (EE)
  • Monash University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Learning Analytics
Published
2018-11-18
Volume
5
Issue
3
ISSN
1929-7750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905428172
Cited by
93
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Analytics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • European Commission (562080-EPP- 1-2015-1-BE-EPPKA3-PI-FORWARD)
  • Erasmus+
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
Keywords
learning analytics, higher education institutions, institutional strategy, education policy, strategic planning, technology adoption, large-scale implementation, business executives, evidence-based policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review