The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Open accessAbstract
Tree boosting is a highly effective and widely used machine learning method. In this paper, we describe a scalable end-to-end tree boosting system called XGBoost, which is used widely by data scientists to achieve state-of-the-art results on many machine learning challenges. We propose a novel sparsity-aware algorithm for sparse data and weighted quantile sketch for approximate tree learning. More importantly, we provide insights on cache access patterns, data compression and sharding to build a scalable tree boosting system. By combining these insights, XGBoost scales beyond billions of examples using far fewer resources than existing systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The XGBoost classifier is also optimized for fast, parallel tree construction, and designed to be fault tolerant under the distributed setting [29].”
From Prediction of Employee Turnover in Organizations using Machine Learning Algorithms (2016) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Compared to other gradient boosted machines, it uses a more regularized-model formalization to control over-fitting, which gives it better performance.”
From Prediction of Employee Turnover in Organizations using Machine Learning Algorithms (2016) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Although the same algorithm was implemented, each study used different risk predictors and datasets, which resulted in widely disparate AUC values of 0.91, 0.83, and 0.679–11.”
From AI-based diabetes care: risk prediction models and implementation concerns (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, the XGBoost algorithm—a machine learning algorithm that uses a sequentially iterative process to learn and correct previous errors—was used in three unimodal studies8.”
From AI-based diabetes care: risk prediction models and implementation concerns (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The top 10 predictors accounted for 43.7% of overall model performance based on the gain metric in the Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm (77), the top 25 predictors for 58.1%, the top 50 predictors for 70.3%, and the top 100 predictors for 81.4% of model performance.”
From Using Administrative Data to Predict Suicide After Psychiatric Hospitalization in the Veterans Health Administration System (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
In the citing paper
“Chen et al. described an end-to-end tree boosting system named XGBoost [51].”
From Applications of Federated Learning; Taxonomy, Challenges, and Research Trends (2022) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“Some other approaches, such as Xgboost [51] and AdaBoost, can reduce bias as it learns from misclassification.However, these algorithms are subtle to outliers and noise.[178]”
From Applications of Federated Learning; Taxonomy, Challenges, and Research Trends (2022) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“XGBoost was chosen due to its efficiency and capability of processing large datasets, its ability to handle missing data and imbalanced datasets, and (relative to other ML algorithms) its interpretability.”
From Machine learning for real-time aggregated prediction of hospital admission for emergency patients (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“These fingerprints are used together with a 1900-dimensioanl enzyme representation, called UniRep vector 29 , as the input for a gradient boosted decision tree model 34 to predict the K M value for an enzyme-substrate pair.”
From Turnover number predictions for kinetically uncharacterized enzymes using machine and deep learning (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
(2011) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/1953048.2078195 · Cited by 8,539
Friedman, J. H. (2002) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/s0167-9473(01)00065-2 · Cited by 7,067
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2000) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1016218223 · Cited by 6,884
LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification
Fan, R.-E., Chang, K., Hsieh, C., Xiang-rui, W., & Lin, C. (2008) · doi:10.5555/1390681.1442794 · Cited by 6,684
MLlib: Machine Learning in Apache SparkPreprint
Meng, X., Bradley, J. K., Yavuz, B., Sparks, E., Venkataraman, S., Liu, D., Freeman, J., Tsai, D., Amde, M., Owen, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of machine learning research · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1505.06807 · Cited by 1,898
From RankNet to LambdaRank to LambdaMART: An Overview
Burges, C. J. C. (2010) · Cited by 1,011
Practical Lessons from Predicting Clicks on Ads at Facebook
He, X., Pan, J. J., Jin, O., Xu, T., Liu, B., Xu, T., Shi, Y., Atallah, A., Herbrich, R., Bowers, S., et al. (2014) · doi:10.1145/2648584.2648589 · Cited by 892
Generalized Boosted Models: A guide to the gbm package
Ridgeway, G. K. (2006) · Cited by 805
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.5555/2124408 · DOI
- J. Bennett and S. Lanning. The netflix prize. In Proceedings of the KDD Cup Workshop 2007, pages 3--6, New York, Aug. 2007.
- T. Chen, H. Li, Q. Yang, and Y. Yu. General functional matrix factorization using gradient boosting. In Proceeding of 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'13), volume 1, pages 436--444, 2013.
- T. Chen, S. Singh, B. Taskar, and C. Guestrin. Efficient second-order gradient boosting for conditional random fields. In Proceeding of 18th Artificial Intelligence and Statistics Conference (AISTATS'15), volume 1, 2015.
- 10.5555/3023549.3023585 · DOI
- 10.5555/2981562.2981675 · DOI
- 10.5555/2946645.2946679 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., & Lee, S.-I. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 · Cited by 10,551
Scenic: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering.
Aibar, S., González-Blas, C. B., Moerman, T., Huynh-Thu, V. A., Imrichova, H., Hulselmans, G., Rambow, F., Marine, J.-C., Geurts, P., Aerts, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4463 · Cited by 6,520
Chicco, D., & Jurman, G. (2020) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 · Cited by 6,143
SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning
Hengl, T., Mendes de Jesus, J., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Ruiperez Gonzalez, M., Kilibarda, M., Blagotić, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M. N., Geng, X., Bauer-Marschallinger, B., et al. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 · Cited by 4,733
Sagi, O., & Rokach, L. (2018) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1249 · Cited by 3,103
A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms
Bentéjac, C., Csörgő, A., & Martínez-Muñoz, G. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09896-5 · Cited by 2,998
Explainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods
Linardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V., & Kotsiantis, S. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23010018 · Cited by 2,922
Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota
Rothschild, D., Weissbrod, O., Barkan, E., Kurilshikov, A., Korem, T., Zeevi, D., Costea, P. I., Godneva, A., Kalka, I. N., Bar, N., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25973 · Cited by 2,859
xgboost: Extreme Gradient Boosting
Chen, T., He, T., Benesty, M., Khotilovich, V., Tang, Y., Cho, H., Chen, K., Mitchell, R., Cano, I., Zhou, T., et al. (2014) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.xgboost · Cited by 2,767
Self-citationA survey on semi-supervised learning
van Engelen, J. E., & Hoos, H. H. (2020) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6 · Cited by 2,666
Tabular data: Deep learning is not all you need
Shwartz-Ziv, R., & Armon, A. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.011 · Cited by 2,172
Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery
Lundberg, S. M., Nair, B., Vavilala, M. S., Horibe, M., Eisses, M. J., Adams, T., Liston, D. E., Low, D. K.-W., Newman, S.-F., Kim, J., et al. (2018) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0 · Cited by 1,967
TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning
Arık, S. Ö., & Pfister, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826 · Cited by 455
The rise of deep learning in drug discovery
Chen, H., Engkvist, O., Wang, Y., Olivecrona, M., & Blaschke, T. (2018) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039 · Cited by 1,770
CatBoost for big data: an interdisciplinary review
Hancock, J., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2020) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-020-00369-8 · Cited by 2,023
DeepDTA: deep drug–target binding affinity prediction
Öztürk, H., Özgür, A., & Özkırımlı, E. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty593 · Cited by 1,792
Over-the-Air Deep Learning Based Radio Signal Classification
O’Shea, T. J., Roy, T., & Clancy, T. C. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2018.2797022 · Cited by 1,677
Generating Focused Molecule Libraries for Drug Discovery with Recurrent Neural Networks
Segler, M. H. S., Kogej, T., Tyrchan, C., & Waller, M. P. (2018) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.7b00512 · Cited by 1,537
Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use
Sanderman, J., Hengl, T., & Fiske, G. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1706103114 · Cited by 1,495
Hutter, F., Kotthoff, L., & Vanschoren, J. (2019) · The Springer series on challenges in machine learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05318-5 · Cited by 1,691
A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection
Li, Q., Wen, Z., Wu, Z., Hu, S., Wang, N., Li, Y., Liu, X., & He, B. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2021.3124599 · Cited by 1,407
A Survey of Ensemble Learning: Concepts, Algorithms, Applications, and Prospects
Mienye, I. D., & Sun, Y. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3207287 · Cited by 1,542
An interpretable mortality prediction model for COVID-19 patients
Li, Y., Zhang, H., Gonçalves, J. M., Xiao, Y., Wang, M., Guo, Y., Sun, C., Tang, X., Jing, L., Zhang, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0180-7 · Cited by 1,328
Techniques for interpretable machine learning
Du, M., Liu, N., & Hu, X. (2019) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3359786 · Cited by 1,268
Deep Multi-View Spatial-Temporal Network for Taxi Demand Prediction
Yao, H., Wu, F. Q., Ke, J., Tang, X., Jia, Y., Lu, S., Gong, P., Ye, J., & Li, Z. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11836 · Cited by 1,248
A Survey of Fake News: Fundamental Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunities
Zhou, X., & Zafarani, R. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3395046 · Cited by 1,184
Nohara, Y., Matsumoto, K., Soejima, H., & Nakashima, N. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106584 · Cited by 1,091
Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey
Borisov, V., Leemann, T., Seßler, K., Haug, J., Pawelczyk, M., & Kasneci, G. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3229161 · Cited by 1,400
Parsa, A. B., Movahedi, A., Taghipour, H., Derrible, S., & Mohammadian, A. (2019) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105405 · Cited by 1,088
Accurate predictions on small data with a tabular foundation model
Hollmann, N., Müller, S., Purucker, L., Krishnakumar, A., Körfer, M., Hoo, S. B., Schirrmeister, R. T., & Hutter, F. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08328-6 · Cited by 1,427
Identification of mobile genetic elements with geNomad
Camargo, A. P., Roux, S., Schulz, F., Babinski, M., Xu, Y., Hu, B., Chain, P., Nayfach, S., & Kyrpides, N. C. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01953-y · Cited by 1,160
Spatial transcriptomics at subspot resolution with BayesSpace
Zhao, E. J., Stone, M. R., Ren, X., Guenthoer, J., Smythe, K. S., Pulliam, T., Williams, S. R., Uytingco, C. R., Taylor, S. E. B., Nghiem, P., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00935-2 · Cited by 1,032
Spatially organized multicellular immune hubs in human colorectal cancer
Pelka, K., Hofree, M., Chen, J. H., Sarkizova, S., Pirl, J. D., Jorgji, V., Bejnood, A., Dionne, D. A., Ge, W. H., Xu, K. H., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.003 · Cited by 917
Designing Theory-Driven User-Centric Explainable AI
Wang, D., Yang, Q., Abdul, A., & Lim, B. Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300831 · Cited by 906
Machine Learning and Deep Learning frameworks and libraries for large-scale data mining: a survey
Nguyen, G., Dlugolinský, Š., Bobák, M., Tran, V., García, Á. L., Heredia, I., Malík, P., & Hluchý, L. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-018-09679-z · Cited by 1,002
Valavi, R., Guillera‐Arroita, G., Lahoz‐Monfort, J. J., & Elith, J. (2022) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1486 · Cited by 830
DeGroat, W., Abdelhalim, H., Patel, K., Mendhe, D., Zeeshan, S., & Ahmed, Z. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50600-8 · Cited by 898
Revisiting Spatial-Temporal Similarity: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Prediction
Yao, H., Tang, X., Wei, H., Zheng, G., & Li, Z. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015668 · Cited by 921
Machine Learning in Predictive Maintenance towards Sustainable Smart Manufacturing in Industry 4.0
Çınar, Z. M., Nuhu, A. A., Zeeshan, Q., Korhan, O., Asmael, M., & Safaei, B. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12198211 · Cited by 897
Data-driven capacity estimation of commercial lithium-ion batteries from voltage relaxation
Zhu, J., Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Gopaluni, R. B., Cao, Y., Heere, M., Mühlbauer, M. J., Mereacre, L., Dai, H., Liu, X., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29837-w · Cited by 835
Data‐Driven Materials Science: Status, Challenges, and Perspectives
Himanen, L., Geurts, A., Foster, A. S., & Rinke, P. (2019) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201900808 · Cited by 808
hdWGCNA identifies co-expression networks in high-dimensional transcriptomics data
Morabito, S., Reese, F., Rahimzadeh, N., Miyoshi, E., & Swarup, V. (2023) · Cell Reports Methods · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2023.100498 · Cited by 773
XGBoost Model for Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis
Ogunleye, A., & Wang, Q. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2019.2911071 · Cited by 768
A survey on addressing high-class imbalance in big data
Leevy, J. L., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Bauder, R. A., & Seliya, N. (2018) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-018-0151-6 · Cited by 801
Mol2vec: Unsupervised Machine Learning Approach with Chemical Intuition
Jaeger-Honz, S., Fulle, S., & Turk, S. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00616 · Cited by 759
Ke, J., Zheng, H., Yang, H., & Chen, X. M. (2017) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.016 · Cited by 748
Raschka, S., Patterson, J. M., & Nolet, C. (2020) · Information · doi:10.3390/info11040193 · Cited by 928
AI applications to medical images: From machine learning to deep learning
Castiglioni, I., Rundo, L., Codari, M., Leo, G. D., Salvatore, C., Interlenghi, M., Gallivanone, F., Cozzi, A., D’Amico, N. C., & Sardanelli, F. (2021) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.006 · Cited by 779
Machine learning in additive manufacturing: State-of-the-art and perspectives
Wang, C., Tan, X., Tor, S. B., & Lim, C. S. (2020) · Additive manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101538 · Cited by 736
A short-term building cooling load prediction method using deep learning algorithms
Fan, C., Xiao, F., & Zhao, Y. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.064 · Cited by 715
Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19
Forster, P. M. D. F., Forster, H. I., Evans, M. J., Gidden, M., JONES, C. D., Keller, C. A., Lamboll, R., Quéré, C. L., Rogelj, J., Rosen, D. Z., et al. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0883-0 · Cited by 689
Insights into geospatial heterogeneity of landslide susceptibility based on the SHAP-XGBoost model
Zhang, J., Ma, X., Zhang, J., Sun, D., Zhou, X., Mi, C., & Wen, H. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117357 · Cited by 689
Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Review
Kaur, D., Uslu, S., Rittichier, K. J., & Durresi, A. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3491209 · Cited by 709
Jiang, D., Wu, Z., Hsieh, C.-Y., Chen, G., Liao, B., Wang, Z., Shen, C., Cao, D., Wu, J., & Hou, T. (2021) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-020-00479-8 · Cited by 664
Lago, J., De Ridder, F., & De Schutter, B. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.069 · Cited by 642
Abdi, A. M. (2019) · GIScience & Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/15481603.2019.1650447 · Cited by 678
Chambon, S., Galtier, M. N., Arnal, P. J., Wainrib, G., & Gramfort, A. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2018.2813138 · Cited by 657
Big-Data Science in Porous Materials: Materials Genomics and Machine Learning
Jablonka, K. M., Ongari, D., Moosavi, S. M., & Smit, B. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00004 · Cited by 656
Feature selection strategies: a comparative analysis of SHAP-value and importance-based methods
Wang, H., Liang, Q., Hancock, J., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2024) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-024-00905-w · Cited by 720
Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth
Cook‐Patton, S. C., Leavitt, S. M., Gibbs, D. A., Harris, N. L., Lister, K., Anderson‐Teixeira, K. J., Briggs, R. D., Chazdon, R. L., Crowther, T. W., Ellis, P. W., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2686-x · Cited by 687
Ström, P., Kartasalo, K., Olsson, H., Solorzano, L., Delahunt, B., Berney, D. M., Bostwick, D. G., Evans, A. J., Grignon, D. J., Humphrey, P. A., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30738-7 · Cited by 620
Financial Fraud: A Review of Anomaly Detection Techniques and Recent Advances
Hilal, W., Gadsden, S. A., & Yawney, J. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116429 · Cited by 807
Raschka, S. (2018) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00638 · Cited by 649
Anomaly detection in time series
Schmidl, S., Wenig, P., & Papenbrock, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3538598.3538602 · Cited by 723
Diabetes Prediction Using Ensembling of Different Machine Learning Classifiers
Hasan, M. K., Alam, M. A., Das, D., Hossain, E., & Hasan, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2989857 · Cited by 656
Alaa, A. M., Bolton, T. R., Angelantonio, E. D., Rudd, J. H. F., & van der Schaar, M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213653 · Cited by 652
TPOT: A Tree-Based Pipeline Optimization Tool for Automating Machine Learning
Olson, R. S., & Moore, J. H. (2019) · The Springer series on challenges in machine learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05318-5_8 · Cited by 621
Machine learning and AI in marketing–Connecting computing power to human insights
Ma, L., & Sun, B. (2020) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.04.005 · Cited by 602
Effective Heart Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques
Bhatt, C., Patel, P. V., Ghetia, T., & Mazzeo, P. L. (2023) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a16020088 · Cited by 694
Shu, K., Wang, S., & Liu, H. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3289600.3290994 · Cited by 630
A Data-Driven Design for Fault Detection of Wind Turbines Using Random Forests and XGboost
Zhang, D., Qian, L., Mao, B., Huang, C., Huang, B., & Si, Y. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2818678 · Cited by 596
Ghosh, P., Azam, S., Jonkman, M., Karim, A., Shamrat, F. M. J. M., Ignatious, E., Shultana, S., Beeravolu, A. R., & Boer, F. D. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3053759 · Cited by 606
Mountjoy, E., Schmidt, E. M., Carmona, M., Schwartzentruber, J., Peat, G., Miranda, A., Fumis, L., Hayhurst, J., Buniello, A., Karim, M. A., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00945-5 · Cited by 581
Feature selection based on artificial bee colony and gradient boosting decision tree
Rao, H., Shi, X., Rodrigue, A. K., Feng, J., Xia, Y., Elhoseny, M., Yuan, X., & Gu, L. (2018) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.036 · Cited by 580
Hou, N., Li, M., He, L., Xie, B., Wang, L., Zhang, R., Yu, Y., Sun, X., Pan, Z., & Wang, K. (2020) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-020-02620-5 · Cited by 580
Common brain disorders are associated with heritable patterns of apparent aging of the brain
Kaufmann, T., van der Meer, D., Doan, N. T., Schwarz, E., Lund, M. J., Agartz, I., Alnæs, D., Barch, D. M., Baur‐Streubel, R., Bertolino, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0471-7 · Cited by 575
Extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost) model to predict the groundwater levels in Selangor Malaysia
Osman, A. I. A., Ahmed, A. N., Fai, C. M., Huang, Y. F., & El‐Shafie, A. (2021) · Ain Shams Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asej.2020.11.011 · Cited by 570
Deep learning sequence-based ab initio prediction of variant effects on expression and disease risk
Zhou, J., Theesfeld, C. L., Yao, K., Chen, K. M., Wong, A. K., & Troyanskaya, O. G. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0160-6 · Cited by 559
Quasi-oracle estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects
Nie, X., & Wager, S. (2020) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asaa076 · Cited by 754
Predictably Unequal? The Effects of Machine Learning on Credit Markets
FUSTER, A., GOLDSMITH‐PINKHAM, P., RAMADORAI, T., & WALTHER, A. (2022) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13090 · Cited by 872
Zamani, M., Cao, C., Ni, X., Bashir, B., & Talebiesfandarani, S. (2019) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos10070373 · Cited by 546
Deep learning-based classification of mesothelioma improves prediction of patient outcome
Courtiol, P., Maussion, C., Moarii, M., Pronier, E., Pilcer, S., Sefta, M., Manceron, P., Toldo, S., Zaslavskiy, M., Le Stang, N., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0583-3 · Cited by 544
Data collection and quality challenges in deep learning: a data-centric AI perspective
Whang, S. E., Roh, Y., Song, H., & Lee, J.-G. (2023) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-022-00775-9 · Cited by 573
Extreme Gradient Boosting as a Method for Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships
Sheridan, R. P., Wang, W. M., Liaw, A., Ma, J., & Gifford, E. M. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00591 · Cited by 544
Theissler, A., Pérez-Velázquez, J., Kettelgerdes, M., & Elger, G. (2021) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.107864 · Cited by 581
Efficient machine learning models for prediction of concrete strengths
Nguyen, H. X., Vu, T., Vo, T. P., & Thai, H. (2020) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120950 · Cited by 568
Ribeiro, M. H. D. M., & Coelho, L. D. S. (2019) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105837 · Cited by 542
SecureBoost: A Lossless Federated Learning Framework
Cheng, K., Fan, T., Jin, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, T., Papadopoulos, D., & Yang, Q. (2021) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2021.3082561 · Cited by 669
Self-citationMachine learning-based prediction of COVID-19 diagnosis based on symptoms
Zoabi, Y., Deri-Rozov, S., & Shomron, N. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00372-6 · Cited by 540
Explainable Machine Learning in Credit Risk Management
Bussmann, N., Giudici, P., Marinelli, D., & Papenbrock, J. (2020) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-020-10042-0 · Cited by 635
He, T., Heidemeyer, M., Ban, F., Cherkasov, A. R., & Ester, M. (2017) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-017-0209-z · Cited by 529
Explainable machine learning in materials science
Zhong, X., Gallagher, B. J., Liu, S., Kailkhura, B., Hiszpanski, A. M., & Han, T. Y.-J. (2022) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00884-7 · Cited by 566
Effective Intrusion Detection System Using XGBoost
Dhaliwal, S. S., Nahid, A.-A., & Abbas, H. (2018) · Information · doi:10.3390/info9070149 · Cited by 509
Building thermal load prediction through shallow machine learning and deep learning
Wang, Z., Hong, T., & Piette, M. A. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114683 · Cited by 532
Gradient boosting machine for modeling the energy consumption of commercial buildings
Touzani, S., Granderson, J., & Fernandes, S. (2017) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.039 · Cited by 523
COVID-19 Coronavirus Vaccine Design Using Reverse Vaccinology and Machine Learning
Ong, E., Wong, M. U., Huffman, A., & He, Y. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01581 · Cited by 499
From explanations to feature selection: assessing SHAP values as feature selection mechanism
Marcilio, W. E., & Eler, D. M. (2020) · 2020 33rd SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI) · doi:10.1109/sibgrapi51738.2020.00053 · Cited by 504
XGBoost-based method for flash flood risk assessment
Ma, M., Zhao, G., He, B., Li, Q., Dong, H., Wang, S., & Wang, Z.-L. (2021) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126382 · Cited by 501
Predicting Hard Rock Pillar Stability Using GBDT, XGBoost, and LightGBM Algorithms
Liang, W., Luo, S., Zhao, G., & Wu, H. (2020) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math8050765 · Cited by 499
Machine learning–XGBoost analysis of language networks to classify patients with epilepsy
Torlay, L., Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Thomas, E., & Baciu, M. (2017) · Brain Informatics · doi:10.1007/s40708-017-0065-7 · Cited by 483
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, T., & Guestrin, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- ORCID
- Guestrin, Carlos
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-08-13
- Pages
- 785-794
- OpenAlex
- W2295598076
- Cited by
- 54,569
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12394 · 2025: 11769 · 2024: 8715 · 2023: 6731 · 2022: 5369 · 2021: 4238 · 2020: 2665 · 2019: 1560 · 2018: 779 · 2017: 294 · 2016: 48
- FWCI
- 936.68
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of Naval Research (N000141010672)
- National Science Foundation (1258741)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
- Keywords
- XGBoost, gradient boosting decision tree, gradient boosting, data sparsity, data compression, data sharding, scalability, large-scale machine learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
