Cited by 51Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace and Expression RecognitionFace recognition and analysis

Audio and face video emotion recognition in the wild using deep neural networks and small datasets

Ding, Wan, Xu, Mingyu, Huang, Dongyan, Lin, Weisi, Dong, Minghui, Yu, Xinguo, Li, Haizhou·2016·Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

Abstract

This paper presents the techniques used in our contribution to Emotion Recognition in the Wild 2016’s video based sub-challenge. The purpose of the sub-challenge is to classify the six basic emotions (angry, sad, happy, surprise, fear & disgust) and neutral. Compared to earlier years’ movie based datasets, this year’s test dataset introduced reality TV videos containing more spontaneous emotion. Our proposed solution is the fusion of facial expression recognition and audio emotion recognition subsystems at score level. For facial emotion recognition, starting from a network pre-trained on ImageNet training data, a deep Convolutional Neural Network is fine-tuned on FER2013 training data for feature extraction. The classifiers, i.e., kernel SVM, logistic regression and partial least squares are studied for comparison. An optimal fusion of classifiers learned from different kernels is carried out at the score level to improve system performance. For audio emotion recognition, a deep Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network (LSTM-RNN) is trained directly using the challenge dataset. Experimental results show that both subsystems individually and as a whole can achieve state-of-the art performance. The overall accuracy of the proposed approach on the challenge test dataset is 53.9%, which is better than the challenge baseline of 40.47% .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2993148.2997637

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, W., Xu, M., Huang, D., Lin, W., Dong, M., Yu, X., & Li, H.
Affiliations
  • Central China Normal University (CN)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Venue
Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2016-10-31
Pages
506-513
OpenAlex
W2548128734
Cited by
51
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5
FWCI
6.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61272206)
  • Open Projects Program of National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition (201600008)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
audio emotion recognition, facial expression recognition, multimodal fusion, score-level fusion, basic emotions, spontaneous emotions, convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, kernel SVM, small datasets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review