The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Participatory Design that Matters—Facing the Big Issues
Open accessAbstract
At a time where computer technology is putting human lives and work under pressure, we discuss how to provide alternatives. We look back at Participatory Design (PD) which was originally about possibilities and alternatives as much as it was about specific solutions. The paper aims to revitalize and revise PD to help people influence big issues . The agenda for this is set through proposing a set of key elements for realizing new, important possibilities. We discuss the possible changes of partnership with users, call for a new role of researchers as activists, debate how to work with demanding visions for lasting impact, and democratic control. We focus on high technological ambitions, on deployment of working prototypes, on alliances, and on scaling up, all seen as important for a PD that matters. We conclude the paper with an invitation to participate in the continued discussion, codesign, and realization of a PD that matters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology
Siegen, U., Pipek, V., Wulf, V., & Siegen, F.-I. F. A. I. F. A. U. (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00195 · Cited by 638
The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002–2012
Halskov, K., & Hansen, N. B. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.003 · Cited by 365
Workflow From Within and Without: Technology and Cooperative Work on the Print Industry Shopfloor
Bowers, J., Button, G., & Sharrock, W. (1995) · Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW ’95 · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0349-7_4 · Cited by 352
Child as Protagonist: Expanding the Role of Children in Participatory Design
Iversen, O. S., Smith, R. C., & Dindler, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children · doi:10.1145/3078072.3079725 · Cited by 333 · cited 3×
“In [47, p. 27], the project researchers, Iversen, Smith, and Dindler, discuss how a commitment to political participatory design defines a new role for children in participatory practices – the role of protagonist.”
BackgroundTying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work
Bødker, S., Dindler, C., & Iversen, O. S. (2017) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-017-9268-y · Cited by 237 · cited 10×
“We lack a concern for the fact that no technology design projects start from scratch today (see also [10]) and we are largely missing concerns for the long-term perspectives (of both technologies and the skill development of people).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationDesign thinking for digital fabrication in education
Smith, R. C., Iversen, O. S., & Hjorth, M. (2015) · International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.10.002 · Cited by 206
Cited by
The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the "Other"
Bennett, C. L., & Rosner, D. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300528 · Cited by 413
The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practice
Delgado, F., Yang, S., Madaio, M., & Yang, Q. (2023) · Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623261 · Cited by 256
The Machine Learning Machine: A Tangible User Interface for Teaching Machine Learning
Kaspersen, M. H., Bilstrup, K.-E. K., & Petersen, M. G. (2021) · Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction · doi:10.1145/3430524.3440638 · Cited by 89
Hard choices in artificial intelligence
Dobbe, R., Krendl Gilbert, T., & Mintz, Y. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103555 · Cited by 65
On Activism and Academia: Reflecting Together and Sharing Experiences Among Critical Friends
Leal, D. D. C., Strohmayer, A., & Krüger, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445263 · Cited by 58
Including Adults with Severe Intellectual Disabilities in Co-Design through Active Support
Bircanin, F., Brereton, M., Sitbon, L., Ploderer, B., Azaabanye Bayor, A., & Koplick, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445057 · Cited by 46
Spektor, F., Fox, S. E., Awumey, E., Begleiter, B., Kulkarni, C., Stringam, B., Riordan, C. A., Rho, H. J., Akridge, H., & Forlizzi, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579466 · Cited by 29
Documenting Data Production Processes: A Participatory Approach for Data Work
Miceli, M., Yang, T., Alvarado Garcia, A., Posada, J., Wang, S. M., Pohl, M., & Hanna, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555623 · Cited by 28
From Fitting Participation to Forging Relationships: The Art of Participatory ML
Cooper, N., & Zafiroglu, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642775 · Cited by 17
Oberschmidt, K., Grünloh, C., Tunç, S., van Velsen, L., & Nijboer, F. (2020) · 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3441000.3441040 · Cited by 12
Glick, P., & Crivellaro, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580934 · Cited by 11
DREEM: Moving from Empathy to Enculturation in Disability Related Human-Centered Design
Baltaxe-Admony, L. B., Duval, J., & Ringland, K. E. (2024) · The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3663548.3675642 · Cited by 9
Alves Villarinho Lima, B., & Almeida, L. D. A. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77431-8_23 · Cited by 3
Indongo, N. N., Smith, R. C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Kandjengo, S., & Mbinge, U. (2026) · Proceedings of the 19th Participatory Design Conference 2026, Vol. 1: Full Papers · doi:10.1145/3796624.3796667 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Bødker, S., & Kyng, M.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
- Published
- 2018-02-13
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-31
- ISSN
- 1073-0516 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7325
- OpenAlex
- W2794258710
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 20.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
