CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9Design Education and PracticeInnovative Human-Technology InteractionDisability Rights and Representation

DREEM: Moving from Empathy to Enculturation in Disability Related Human-Centered Design

Open access
Baltaxe-Admony, Leya Breanna, Duval, Jared, Ringland, Kathryn E.·2024·The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
DOI 10.1145/3663548.3675642
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Empathy-building, the first stage in human-centered design, often involves methods that inadvertently reinforce negative stereotypes and biases toward disabled communities. In this work, we introduce a new method: Disability-Related Empathy from Existing Media (DREEM). This method focuses on enculturation rather than traditional ideas of empathy. DREEM leverages media created by disabled individuals to facilitate a deeper, culturally informed understanding. Cultural content is rich with authentic perspectives and tacit design knowledge from people with disabilities. Our four-step process includes (1) discovering relevant media, (2) close reading, (3) reflective journaling, and (4) aggregation of insights. In this article, we present our process of creating DREEM using research through design in multiple research and education contexts. Our findings show that DREEM can be applied in both design classrooms and research contexts to foster a more nuanced understanding of disability for newcomers to the space.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3663548.3675642

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disability cultural products-including videos, books, games, or podcasts-provide authentic disabled experiences from disabled people, beyond textbooks or technical guidelines.

    “First, disability cultural products-including videos, books, games [6], or podcasts [1]-provide authentic disabled experiences from disabled people, beyond textbooks or technical guidelines.”

    From Where are the Disabled Students?: A Literature Review of Disability Inclusion in Computing Education Research (2026) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Introduction describes close reading media created by disabled people, and §5.1 recommends a range of public media, including videos and text-based work, as ways to engage with their perspectives (page numbers unavailable). The paper does not specifically mention podcasts or compare these sources with textbooks or technical guidelines; those details are not supported by this copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Lisa Anthony, YooJin Kim, and Leah Findlater. 2013. Analyzing user-generated youtube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impair- ments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1223-1232. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466158 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Comput- ing Systems. ACM, Atlanta Georgia USA, 1301-1310. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 1753326.1753521 · DOI
  3. Michael Bartl, Vijai Kumar Kannan, and Hanna Stockinger. 2016. A review and analysis of literature on netnography research. International Journal of Technology Marketing 11, 2 (2016), 165. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTMKT.2016. 075687 · DOI
  4. Cynthia L. Bennett, Burren Peil, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. Biographical Prototypes: Reimagining Recognition and Disability in Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, San Diego CA USA, 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322376 · DOI
  5. Cynthia L. Bennett and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the "Other". In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300528 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Melanie Birks, Ysanne Chapman, and Karen Francis. 2008. Memoing in qualita- tive research: Probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing 13, 1 (Jan. 2008), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987107081254 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Meredith Broussard. 2023. More than a glitch: confronting race, gender, and ability bias in tech. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  8. Barry Brummett. 2019. Techniques of close reading (second edition ed.). SAGE, Los Angeles.
  9. Susanne Bødker and Morten Kyng. 2018. Participatory Design that Mat- ters-Facing the Big Issues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 1 (Feb. 2018), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152421 · DOI
  10. James I Charlton. 2000. Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Univ of California Press, Berkeley, CA USA.
  11. Ishita Chordia, Leya Breanna Baltaxe-Admony, Ashley Boone, Alyssa Sheehan, and Lynn Dombrowski. 2024. Social Justice in HCI: A Systematic Literature Review. (2024).
  12. Tanvir Irfan Chowdhury, Sharif Mohammad Shahnewaz Ferdous, and John Quarles. 2017. Information recall in a virtual reality disability simulation. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Tech- nology (VRST '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139131.3139143 · DOI
  13. Tanvir Irfan Chowdhury, Sharif Mohammad Shahnewaz Ferdous, and John Quarles. 2021. VR Disability Simulation Reduces Implicit Bias Towards Persons With Disabilities. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 6 (June 2021), 3079-3090. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2958332 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. · DOI
  14. Paul Dourish, Janet Finlay, Phoebe Sengers, and Peter Wright. 2004. Refective HCI: towards a critical technical practice. In CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1727-1728. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921. 986203 · DOI
  15. Paul Dourish, Christopher Lawrence, Tuck Wah Leong, and Greg Wadley. 2020. On Being Iterated: The Afective Demands of Design Participation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376545 · DOI
  16. Brooke Erin Dufy, Thomas Poell, and David B. Nieborg. 2019. Platform Practices in the Cultural Industries: Creativity, Labor, and Citizenship. Social Media + Soci- ety 5, 4 (Oct. 2019), 205630511987967. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119879672 · DOI
  17. Jared Duval, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Siying Chen, Melissa Chu, Divya Subra- monian, Austin Wang, Geofrey Xiang, Sri Kurniawan, and Katherine Isbister. 2021. Chasing play on TikTok from populations with disabilities to inspire playful and inclusive technology design. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI '21), may 8-13. ACM, On- line (originally Yokohama, Japan), 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445303 · DOI
  18. Jared Scott Duval, Elena Márquez Segura, and Sri Kurniawan. 2018. SpokeIt: A Co-Created Speech Therapy Experience. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3186494 · DOI
  19. Ashley Flower, Matthew K. Burns, and Nicole A. Bottsford-Miller. 2007. Meta- Analysis of Disability Simulation Research. Remedial and Special Education 28, 2 (March 2007), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280020601 · DOI
  20. Sarah Fox, Catherine Lim, Tad Hirsch, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2020. Accounting for Design Activism: On the Positionality and Politics of Designerly Intervention. Design Issues 36, 1 (Jan. 2020), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00571 · DOI
  21. William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design?. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -CHI '12. ACM Press, Austin, Texas, USA, 937. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2207676.2208538 · DOI
  22. Connor Geddes, David R. Flatla, and Ciabhan L. Connelly. 2023. 30 Years of Solving the Wrong Problem: How Recolouring Tool Design Fails those with Colour Vision Defciency. In The 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, New York NY USA, 1-13. https://doi. org/10.1145/3597638.3608407 · DOI
  23. Kathrin Gerling, Kieran Hicks, Michael Kalyn, Adam Evans, and Conor Linehan. 2016. Designing Movement-based Play With Young People Using Powered Wheelchairs. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 4447-4458. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/2858036.2858070 · DOI
  24. Cole Gleason, Amy Pavel, Himalini Gururaj, Kris Kitani, and Jefrey Bigham. 2020. Making GIFs Accessible. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Virtual Event Greece, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3417027 · DOI
  25. Dan Goodley. 2017. Disability studies: an interdisciplinary introduction (2nd edition ed.). SAGE, Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore Washington DC Melbourne.
  26. Foad Hamidi, Kellie Poneres, Aaron Massey, and Amy Hurst. 2018. Who Should Have Access to my Pointing Data? Privacy Tradeofs of Adaptive Assistive Tech- nologies. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3239331 · DOI
  27. Sven Ove Hansson. 2007. The Ethics of Enabling Technology. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16, 03 (July 2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0963180107070296 · DOI
  28. Megan Hofmann, Devva Kasnitz, Jennifer Mankof, and Cynthia L Bennett. 2020. Living Disability Theory: Refections on Access, Research, and Design. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3416996 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Stacy Holman Jones. 2007. Autoethnography. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, George Ritzer (Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Oxford, UK, wbeosa082. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosa082 · DOI
  30. Harald Holone and Jo Herstad. 2013. Three tensions in participatory design for inclusion. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Paris France, 2903-2906. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2470654.2481401 · DOI
  31. Delaura L. Hubbs and Charles F. Brand. 2005. The Paper Mirror: Understanding Refective Journaling. Journal of Experiential Education 28, 1 (July 2005), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590502800107 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc. · DOI
  32. Herman Woodrow Hughes, Mary Kooy, and Lannie Kanevsky. 1997. Dialogic Refection and Journaling. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 70, 4 (March 1997), 187-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655. 1997.10544193 · DOI
  33. Amy Hurst and Jasmine Tobias. 2011. Empowering individuals with do-it- yourself assistive technology. In The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2049536.2049541 · DOI
  34. Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on Computer- Human Interaction 19, 3 (Oct. 2012), 23:1-23:18. https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364. 2362371 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Lilly Irani, Janet Vertesi, Paul Dourish, Kavita Philip, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2010. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Atlanta Georgia USA, 1311-1320. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753522 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Dhruv Jain, Audrey Desjardins, Leah Findlater, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2019. Au- toethnography of a Hard of Hearing Traveler. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Pittsburgh PA USA, 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353800 · DOI
  37. Alison Kafer. 2013. Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.
  38. Claire Kearney-Volpe, Devorah Kletenik, Kate Sonka, Deborah Sturm, and Amy Hurst. 2019. Evaluating Instructor Strategy and Student Learning Through Dig- ital Accessibility Course Enhancements. In The 21st International ACM SIGAC- CESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Pittsburgh PA USA, 377-388. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353795 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Eva Feder Kittay. 1999. Love's labor: essays on women, equality, and dependency. Routledge, New York.
  40. Devorah Kletenik and Rachel F. Adler. 2023. Who Wins? A Comparison of Accessibility Simulation Games vs. Classroom Modules. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. ACM, Toronto ON Canada, 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569769 · DOI
  41. Devorah Kletenik and Rachel F. Adler. 2024. Motivated by Inclusion: Understand- ing Students' Empathy and Motivation to Design Accessibly Across a Spectrum of Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2024). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 680-686. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630894 · DOI
  42. Robert Kozinets. 2019. Netnography: the essential guide to qualitative social media research (3rd edition ed.). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  43. Robert V. Kozinets. 2015. Netnography: redefned (2nd edition ed.). Sage, Los Angeles. OCLC: ocn913581311.
  44. Sonja Lyubomirsky, Kennon M. Sheldon, and David Schkade. 2005. Pursu- ing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change. Review of General Psychology 9, 2 (June 2005), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Kelly Mack, Emma McDonnell, Dhruv Jain, Lucy Lu Wang, Jon E. Froehlich, and Leah Findlater. 2021. What Do We Mean by "Accessibility Research"? A Literature Survey of Accessibility Papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to 2019. arXiv:2101.04271 [cs] (Feb. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445412 arXiv: 2101.04271. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Kelly Mack, Emma J. McDonnell, Leah Findlater, and Heather D. Evans. 2022. Chronically Under-Addressed: Considerations for HCI Accessibility Practice with Chronically Ill People. In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGAC- CESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Athens Greece, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3544803 · DOI
  47. Kristina Mah, Lian Loke, and Luke Hespanhol. 2021. Towards a Contemplative Research Framework for Training Self-Observation in HCI: A Study of Compas- sion Cultivation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 28, 6 (Nov. 2021), 39:1-39:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3471932 · DOI
  48. Jennifer Mankof, Gillian R. Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz. 2010. Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the feld of assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility -ASSETS '10. ACM Press, Orlando, Florida, USA, 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 1878803.1878807 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Mark C. Marino. 2020. Critical code studies. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mas- sachusetts.
  50. Emma J. McDonnell, Kelly Avery Mack, Kathrin Gerling, Katta Spiel, Cynthia L. Bennett, Robin N. Brewer, Rua Mae Williams, and Garreth W. Tigwell. 2023. Tackling the Lack of a Practical Guide in Disability-Centered Research. In The 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, New York NY USA, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3597638.3615650 · DOI
  51. Evgeny Morozov. 2013. To save everything, click here: the folly of technological solutionism (1. ed ed.). PublicAfairs, New York, NY. OCLC: 841151451.
  52. Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, and Kathy Hudson. 2008. Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic Research. The American Journal of Bioethics 8, 11 (Dec. 2008), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160802513093 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160802513093. · DOI
  53. Elena Márquez Segura, Annika Waern, Luis Márquez Segura, and David López Recio. 2016. Playifcation: The PhySeEar case. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 376-388.
  54. Michelle R. Nario-Redmond, Dobromir Gospodinov, and Angela Cobb. 2017. Crip for a day: The unintended negative consequences of disability simulations. Rehabilitation Psychology 62, 3 (Aug. 2017), 324-333. https://doi.org/10.1037/ rep0000127 · DOI
  55. David B Nieborg and Thomas Poell. 2018. The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society 20, 11 (Nov. 2018), 4275-4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha. 2018. Care work: dreaming disability justice. Arsenal Pulp Press, Vancouver. OCLC: on1022794053.
  57. Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha. 2022. The future is disabled: prophecies, love notes, and mourning songs. Arsenal Pulp Press, Vancouver.
  58. Hasso Plattner, Christoph Meinel, and Larry Leifer (Eds.). 2011. Design thinking: understand -improve -apply. Springer, Berlin. OCLC: 845756544.
  59. Fitz John Porter Poole. 1994. Socialization, enculturation and the development of personal identity. Companion encyclopedia of anthropology (1994), 831-890. Publisher: Routledge New York.
  60. Carol Rambo and Carolyn Ellis. 2020. Autoethnography. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, George Ritzer (Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Oxford, UK, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosa082.pub2 · DOI
  61. Kathryn E. Ringland. 2019. A Place to Play: The (Dis)Abled Embodied Experience for Autistic Children in Online Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300518 · DOI
  62. Warren Sack. 2019. The software arts. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9495. 001.0001 OCLC: 1082365540 tex.ids= sackSoftwareArts2019a. · DOI
  63. Sami Schalk. 2013. Coming to Claim Crip: Disidentifcation with/in Disability Studies. Disability Studies Quarterly 33, 2 (March 2013). https://doi.org/10. 18061/dsq.v33i2.3705 Number: 2. · DOI
  64. Trenton Schulz and Kristin Skeide Fuglerud. 2012. Creating Personas with Dis- abilities. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs (Lecture Notes in Com- puter Science), Klaus Miesenberger, Arthur Karshmer, Petr Penaz, and Wolfgang Zagler (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-642-31534-3_22 · DOI
  65. Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph 'Jofsh' Kaye. 2005. Refective design. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical com- puting: between sense and sensibility. ACM, Aarhus Denmark, 49-58. https: //doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Kristen Shinohara, Nayeri Jacobo, Wanda Pratt, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2020. Design for Social Accessibility Method Cards: Engaging Users and Refecting on Social Scenarios for Accessible Design. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 12, 4 (Jan. 2020), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369903 · DOI
  67. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. Self-Conscious or Self- Confdent? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 8, 2 (Jan. 2016), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2827857 · DOI
  68. Allegra Smith. 2023. Designing Feminist Methodologies: Foregrounding Gender, Positionality, and Justice in Communication Design Research. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. ACM, Orlando FL USA, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1145/3615335.3623008 · DOI
  69. Katta Spiel, Christopher Frauenberger, Os Keyes, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2019. Agency of Autistic Children in Technology Research-A Critical Literature Review. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 26, 6 (Dec. 2019), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3344919 · DOI
  70. Kevin M. Storer and Stacy M. Branham. 2019. "That's the Way Sighted People Do It": What Blind Parents Can Teach Technology Designers About Co-Reading with Children. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Con- ference (DIS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 385-398. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322374 · DOI
  71. Cella M. Sum, Franchesca Spektor, Rahaf Alharbi, Leya Breanna Baltaxe- Admony, Erika Devine, Hazel Anneke Dixon, Jared Duval, Tessa Eagle, Frank Elavsky, Kim Fernandes, Leandro S. Guedes, Serena Hillman, Vaishnav Kameswaran, Lynn Kirabo, Tamanna Motahar, Kathryn E. Ringland, Anastasia Schaadhardt, Laura Scheepmaker, and Alicia Williamson. [n. d.]. Challenging Ableism: A Critical Turn Toward Disability Justice in HCI. 30, 4 ([n. d.]), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3665602 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Tifany Thang. 2018. PhD Forum: Strengthening Social Emotional Skills for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities Through Virtual Reality Games. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP). IEEE, Taormina, 242-243. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTCOMP.2018.00061 · DOI
  73. Tanya Titchkosky. 2011. Question Of Access: Disability, Space, Meaning. Univer- sity Of Toronto Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader? id=none&isbn=9781442662667 OCLC: 1124496379.
  74. Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2020. How Pac-Man eats. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  75. Rua Mae Williams, Louanne Boyd, and Juan E. Gilbert. 2023. Counterventions: a reparative refection on interventionist HCI. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581480 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Rua M. Williams and Juan E. Gilbert. 2019. Cyborg Perspectives on Computing Research Reform. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19). Association for Computing Machin- ery, New York, NY, USA, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3310421 · DOI
  77. Rua M. Williams, Kathryn Ringland, Amelia Gibson, Mahender Mandala, Arne Maibaum, and Tiago Guerreiro. 2021. Articulations toward a crip HCI. Interac- tions 28, 3 (April 2021), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458453 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Langdon Winner. 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109, 1 (1980), 121-136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652 Publisher: The MIT Press.
  79. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 493-502.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baltaxe-Admony, L. B., Duval, J., & Ringland, K. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
ORCID
Venue
The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-10-27
Pages
1-17
DOI
10.1145/3663548.3675642
OpenAlex
W4403576728
Cited by
9
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4
FWCI
11.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
disability, human-centered design, empathy, enculturation, disability stereotypes, design education, research through design, close reading, reflective journals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review