Cited by 54Social Robot Interaction and HRIEthics and Social Impacts of AIHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

How can we trust a robot?

Open access
Kuipers, Benjamin·2018·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

If intelligent robots take on a larger role in our society, what basis will humans have for trusting them?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3173087

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuipers, B.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Kuipers, Benjamin
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2018-02-21
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
86-95
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2787943363
Cited by
54
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
trust in robots, human-robot interaction, intelligent robots, social robots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review