Cited by 493Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesDisability Rights and Representation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 161 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design

Open access
Bennett, Cynthia L., Brady, Erin, Branham, Stacy M.·2018·Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

Abstract

In this paper, we describe interdependence for assistive technology design, a frame developed to complement the traditional focus on independence in the Assistive Technology field. Interdependence emphasizes collaborative access and people with disabilities' important and often understated contribution in these efforts. We lay the foundation of this frame with literature from the academic discipline of Disability Studies and popular media contributed by contemporary disability justice activists. Then, drawing on cases from our own work, we show how the interdependence frame (1) synthesizes findings from a growing body of research in the Assistive Technology field and (2) helps us orient to additional technology design opportunities. We position interdependence as one possible orientation to, not a prescription for, research and design practice--one that opens new design possibilities and affirms our commitment to equal access for people with disabilities.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper proposes interdependence as a complementary frame to independence in assistive technology research and design, emphasizing relational access and disabled people’s contributions. It develops four tenets and illustrates them through three cases and three AT research areas.

Key findings

  • The authors define an interdependence frame with four tenets: attention to relations, recognition of simultaneous assistance, visibility of work done by people with disabilities, and disruption of ability-based hierarchies.
  • They argue independence and interdependence are not mutually exclusive, citing rehabilitation scholarship that recommends teaching both in vocational programs.
  • They apply the frame to three cases: two visually impaired shoppers navigating a store with a guide dog, three disabled coworkers in a public-sector office, and the Disability March organized alongside the 2017 Women’s March, which took place in over 400 U.S. cities.
  • They identify implications for three AT areas: crowd work, Ability-Based Design, and navigation.

Methods

  • Conceptual and position paper synthesizing literature from Disability Studies, disability justice activism, and assistive technology research.
  • Three qualitative cases drawn from the authors’ research: a conversation transcript from field observations of two visually impaired shoppers, interviews and observations of three disabled team members in a workplace, and analysis of the Disability March blog/social media and participant accounts.
  • Main analysis applies the four-tenet interdependence frame to the cases and discusses how it could expand existing AT research directions.

Limitations

  • Stated limitations: Not stated in the paper; the authors do present interdependence as a possible lens rather than a required prescription.
  • Evident from the text: the cases are small and illustrative—one transcript, three coworkers in one office, and one online march—so they do not provide generalizable findings.
  • Evident from the text: the paper does not formally evaluate or compare the interdependence frame against alternative framings, and the cases come from the authors’ own work.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3234695.3236348

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 161 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 78 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 152
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 66
183 of 183
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There has yet to be an exploration of the meaning of independence in the AT community.

    “To our knowledge, there has yet to be an exploration of this kind in the AT community.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The individual model was the prominent conception of disability at the time.

    “Oliver contrasted the social model with the individual model, the prominent conception of disability at the time.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The term 'interdependence' has not been used in AT literature.

    “While the term interdependence has not been used in AT literature, the concept has long been discussed in Disability Studies and disability justice circles.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some scholars have adopted a view that interdependent relationships are necessary to achieve access.

    “Amid critiques, some scholars have adopted a view that interdependent relationships are necessary to achieve access.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For people with disabilities, asserting independence has been and remains an important step toward equal rights.

    “For people with disabilities, asserting independence has been and remains an important step toward equal rights.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Independence and interdependence are not dichotomous or mutually exclusive.

    “First, independence and interdependence are not dichotomous or mutually exclusive.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Interdependence is not necessarily better than independence.

    “Second, interdependence is not necessarily better than independence, and the following examples elucidate these complexities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Instilling interdependence establishes people with disabilities as contributors to, not just recipients of, community support and assistance.

    “But, instilling interdependence establishes them as contributors to--not just recipients of--community support and assistance.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AT research often reports individual experiences in its findings.

    “In AT research, studying relations can help nuance the individual experiences often reported in our findings.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Interdependence considers everyone and everything in an interaction to be mutually reliant.

    “Since interdependence considers everyone and everything in an interaction to be mutually reliant”
    “since interdependence considers everyone mutually reliant”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    People with and without disabilities are equal.

    “it asserts that people with and without disabilities are equal.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Disability March draws on early disability rights protests in which activists self-organized to ensure that their access needs were met appropriately.

    “First, the Disability March itself draws on the early disability rights protests -a group of activists self-organizing to ensure that their access needs were met appropriately.”
12 of 12

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Blind-employees study is cited as reference 7

    Minor

    The text attributes the blind-employees study to Branham and Kane [7], but reference 7 is by Brady and colleagues. The Branham and Kane study appears as reference 8.

  • Wayfinding claim cites a crowd-work study

    Minor

    The introduction cites reference 10 as an example of research on independent navigation, but reference 10 concerns older adults' motivations and challenges in crowd work.

  • Mixed-ability co-habitants study is cited as reference 8

    Minor

    The passage cites reference 8 for Branham and Kane's work on co-habitants, but reference 8 is their study of workplaces. Their study of home spaces is listed as reference 9.

  • William is called Warren in Case 1

    Minor

    The shopping case identifies the participant as William, but its analysis calls him Warren.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dom Chatterjee . 2018 . Independence is an Ableist Myth: Unlocking the Power of Community in Healing. The Body is Not An Apology . Retrieved February 22, 2018 from https://thebodyisnotanapology.com/magazine/independence-is-an-ableist-myth-unlocking-the-power-of-community-in-healing/ Dom Chatterjee. 2018. Independence is an Ableist Myth: Unlocking the Power of Community in Healing. The Body is Not An Apology. Retrieved February 22, 2018 from https://thebodyisnotanapology.com/magazine/independence-is-an-ableist-myth-unlocking-the-power-of-community-in-healing/
  2. Nomy Lamm . This Is Disability Justice. The Body is Not An Apol . Retrieved April 12, 2018 from https://thebodyisnotanapology.com/magazine/this-is-disability-justice/ Nomy Lamm. This Is Disability Justice. The Body is Not An Apol. Retrieved April 12, 2018 from https://thebodyisnotanapology.com/magazine/this-is-disability-justice/
  3. 10.1145/2702123.2702437 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 410

Metadata

Authors
Bennett, C. L., Brady, E., & Branham, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-10-08
Pages
161-173
OpenAlex
W2896226941
Cited by
493
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 122 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 1
FWCI
42.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • Author eBooks
Funders
National Science Foundation (IIS-1353312 and DGE-1256082)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
interdependence, assistive technology design, disability independence, disability studies, people with disabilities, equal access

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-20, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-20 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review