Cited by 33Social Robot Interaction and HRIAI in Service InteractionsSpeech and dialogue systems

The Effect of Audiences on the User Experience with Conversational Interfaces in Physical Spaces

Candello, Heloisa, Pinhanez, Claudio, Pichiliani, Mauro, Cavalin, Paulo, Figueiredo, Flavio, Vasconcelos, Marisa, Do Carmo, Haylla·2019·Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

How does the presence of an audience influence the social interaction with a conversational system in a physical space? To answer this question, we analyzed data from an art exhibit where visitors interacted in natural language with three chatbots representing characters from a book. We performed two studies to explore the influence of audiences. In Study 1, we did fieldwork cross-analyzing the reported perception of the social interaction, the audience conditions (visitor is alone, visitor is observed by acquaintances and/or strangers), and control variables such as the visitor's familiarity with the book and gender. In Study 2, we analyzed over 5,000 conversation logs and video recordings, identifying dialogue patterns and how they correlated with the audience conditions. Some significant effects were found, suggesting that conversational systems in physical spaces should be designed based on whether other people observe the user or not.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3290605.3300320

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowledge on chatbot use has been gathered for a range of contexts, including the private sphere, at work, and in public spaces.

    “In consequence, knowledge on chatbot use has been gathered for a range of contexts—in the private sphere [87], at work [74], and in public spaces [17].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Candello, H., Pinhanez, C., Pichiliani, M., Cavalin, P., Figueiredo, F., Vasconcelos, M., & Do Carmo, H.
Affiliations
  • IBM Research - Brazil (BR)
  • IBM (Brazil) (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • IBM Research Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Venue
Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-05-02
Pages
1-13
OpenAlex
W2941541859
Cited by
33
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
FWCI
9.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
conversational interfaces, audience effects, social interaction, chatbots, physical space, user experience, dialogue patterns, art exhibitions, natural language interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review