The Burden of Survival: How Doctoral Students in Computing Bridge the Chasm of Inaccessibility
Abstract
Despite efforts to support students with disabilities in higher education, few continue to pursue doctoral degrees in computing. We conducted an interview study with 12 blind and low vision, and 7 deaf and hard of hearing current and former doctoral students in computing to understand how graduate students adjust to inaccessibility and ineffective accommodations. We asked participants how they worked around inaccessibility, managed ineffective accommodations, and advocated for tools and services. Employing a lens of ableism in our analysis, we found that participants’ extra effort to address accessibility gaps gave rise to a burden of survival, which they sustained to meet expectations of graduate-level productivity. We recommend equitable solutions that acknowledge taken-for-granted workarounds and that actively address inaccessibility in the graduate school context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most critiques of disability and access have been conducted in the U.S., leaving limited insight into how disability and access vary in other cultural and political contexts.
“However, most critiques have been conducted in the U.S. [55, 76, 77, 85, 97, 98], leaving limited insight into how disability and access vary in other cultural and political contexts.”
From Access in the Shadow of Ableism: An Autoethnography of a Blind Student's Higher Education Experience in China (2026) · cites this paper as [77]
Disabled students often take on significant labor to meet their access needs, such as requesting access services, incorporating accommodations into routines, and developing workarounds.
“Disabled students often take on significant labor to meet their access needs [41, 77], such as spending considerable time and effort requesting access services (e.g., interpreters), incorporating accommodations into their routines (e.g., installing and learning new software), and developing workarounds to address pervasive inaccessibility in technological tools [77].”
From Access in the Shadow of Ableism: An Autoethnography of a Blind Student's Higher Education Experience in China (2026) · cites this paper as [77]
Similar experiences occurred repeatedly throughout Zhang's study at University B; negotiating with others to secure access introduced significant labor to study.
“Similar experiences occurred repeatedly throughout Zhang's study at University B. Similar to findings reported in the U.S. [41, 55, 77, 85], negotiating with others to secure access introduced significant labor to study.”
From Access in the Shadow of Ableism: An Autoethnography of a Blind Student's Higher Education Experience in China (2026) · cites this paper as [77]
Although requesting accommodations required effort similar to that in the U.S., the process at University B was complicated by nuanced interpersonal dynamics in a context lacking both established support policies and disability awareness.
“In these instances, although requesting accommodations required effort similar to that in the U.S. [41, 55, 77, 85], the process was complicated by nuanced interpersonal dynamics in a context lacking both established support policies and disability awareness.”
From Access in the Shadow of Ableism: An Autoethnography of a Blind Student's Higher Education Experience in China (2026) · cites this paper as [77]
Prior research on education accessibility often focused on specific stages of schooling such as graduate schools or on identifying accessibility needs and issues.
“Prior research on education accessibility often focused on specific stages of schooling such as graduate schools [41, 76, 77] or on identifying accessibility needs and issues [55].”
From Access in the Shadow of Ableism: An Autoethnography of a Blind Student's Higher Education Experience in China (2026) · cites this paper as [77]
These barriers often force students to expend additional time and energy for engineering workarounds that meet their access needs.
“These barriers often force students to expend additional time and energy for engineering workarounds that meet their access needs [52, 100].”
From "I'd Never Actually Realized How Big An Impact It Had Until Now": Perspectives of University Students with Disabilities on Generative Artificial Intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as [100]
The hidden additional time and energy put forth by students for gaining and maintaining access, referred to as the burden of survival by Shinohara et al., is a consequence of inaccessible environments.
“This hidden, additional time and energy put forth by students for the sake of gaining and maintaining access, referred to as the burden of survival by Shinohara et al. [100], is a consequence of inaccessible environments.”
From "I'd Never Actually Realized How Big An Impact It Had Until Now": Perspectives of University Students with Disabilities on Generative Artificial Intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as [100]
Documented assignment-level pathways and program-level skill alignment exist to support curricular embedding.
“documented assignment-level pathways and program-level skill alignment exist to support it [4, 6, 10, 19, 21, 30, 31, 35].”
From Teaching Participatory Inclusive IT Design with a Neurodiversity Lens in Computing Education (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Embedding UDL and accessibility across core CS courses is one concrete mechanism to interrupt the cycle from curricular neglect to inaccessible educational technologies and back to student access labor.
“In computing, embedding UDL and accessibility across core CS courses is one concrete mechanism to interrupt the cycle from curricular neglect to inaccessible educational technologies and back to student access labor, making the intended transfer pathway explicit [4, 19, 20, 31, 35].”
From Teaching Participatory Inclusive IT Design with a Neurodiversity Lens in Computing Education (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
Claiming disability: knowledge and identity
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-6303 · Cited by 1,518 · see citing works
Academic Ableism: Disability and Higher Education
Dolmage, J. (2017) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9708722 · Cited by 884 · cited 9× · see citing works
“Ableism in academia has material impacts on the participation of disabled academics partly due to the norms embedded in academic life [8, 13].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Experience of Higher Education from the Perspective of Disabled Students
Holloway, S. (2001) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687590120059568 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
"I am just terrified of my future" Epistemic Violence in Disability Related Technology Research
Ymous, A., Spiel, K., Keyes, O., Williams, R. M., Good, J., Hornecker, E., & Bennett, C. L. (2020) · Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3334480.3381828 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Navigating Graduate School with a Disability
Jain, D., Potluri, V., & Sharif, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3373625.3416986 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Access Differential and Inequitable Access: Inaccessibility for Doctoral Students in Computing
Shinohara, K., McQuaid, M., & Jacobo, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3373625.3416989 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anticipate and Adjust: Cultivating Access in Human-Centered Methods
Mack, K., McDonnell, E., Potluri, V., Xu, M., Zabala, J., Bigham, J., Mankoff, J., & Bennett, C. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501882 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Mixed Abilities and Varied Experiences: a group autoethnography of a virtual summer internship
Mack, K., Das, M., Jain, D., Bragg, D., Tang, J., Begel, A., Beneteau, E., Davis, J. U., Glasser, A., Park, J. S., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3441852.3471199 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
The Invisible Labor of Access in Academic Writing Practices: A Case Analysis with Dyslexic Adults
Wang, E. Q., & Piper, A. M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3512967 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Atcheson, A., Khan, O., Siemann, B., Jain, A., & Karahalios, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714121 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Interdependent Variables: Remotely Designing Tactile Graphics for an Accessible Workflow
de Greef, L., Moritz, D., & Bennett, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3441852.3476468 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Mack, K. A., Sidik, N. A., Desai, A., McDonnell, E. J., Mehta, K., Zhang, C., & Mankoff, J. (2023) · The 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3597638.3614547 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Other times accommodations are not efective or are not carried out correctly by instructors or disability services [14, 21, 22].”
BackgroundAuthor Reflections on Creating Accessible Academic Papers
Menzies, R., Tigwell, G. W., & Crabb, M. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3546195 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Das, M., Stangl, A., & Findlater, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3641018 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Tang, X., & Zhang, W. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790464 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Rather than treating access as a solution to ableism, we argue that it should be understood as an ongoing exploratory practice within ableist structures.”
InfluentialCripping AI: Reimagining AI Through Lived Disability Experiences
Tang, X., Lin, T.-A., Li, J., & Wu, S. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3805689.3806744 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Teaching Participatory Inclusive IT Design with a Neurodiversity Lens in Computing Education
Hermann, J., Jansen, N., Richter, U., Fleer, A., & Doganün, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 25th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/3769994.3770007 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“In computing, embedding UDL and accessibility across core CS courses is one concrete mechanism to interrupt the cycle from curricular neglect to inaccessible educational technologies and back to student access labor, making the intended transfer pathway explicit [4, 19, 20, 31, 35].”
Meiners, A.-L., Yildiz, Z., Gerling, K., Alexandrovsky, D., & Biernacka, K. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3814957
- Authors
- Shinohara, K., McQuaid, M., & Jacobo, N.
- Affiliations
- Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
- ORCID
- Shinohara, Kristen
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2021-05-06
- Pages
- 1-13
- OpenAlex
- W3163859303
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1926209)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Keywords
- computing education, accessibility, visually impaired students, deaf and hard of hearing students, accommodation, ableism, graduate student support, disability equity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review