Cited by 30Mobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsUsability and User Interface Design

"I Hope This Is Helpful": Understanding Crowdworkers' Challenges and Motivations for an Image Description Task

Simons, Rachel N., Gurari, Danna, Fleischmann, Kenneth R.·2020·Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

AI image captioning challenges encourage broad participation in designing algorithms that automatically create captions for a variety of images and users. To create large datasets necessary for these challenges, researchers typically employ a shared crowdsourcing task design for image captioning. This paper discusses findings from our thematic analysis of 1,064 comments left by Amazon Mechanical Turk workers using this task design to create captions for images taken by people who are blind. Workers discussed difficulties in understanding how to complete this task, provided suggestions of how to improve the task, gave explanations or clarifications about their work, and described why they found this particular task rewarding or interesting. Our analysis provides insights both into this particular genre of task as well as broader considerations for how to employ crowdsourcing to generate large datasets for developing AI algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3415176

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simons, R. N., Gurari, D., & Fleischmann, K. R.
Affiliations
  • Texas Woman's University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2020-10-14
Volume
4
Issue
CSCW2
Pages
1-26
ISSN
2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094043653
Cited by
27
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
image captioning, crowdsourcing, Amazon Mechanical Turk, blind users, task design, dataset construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review