Cited by 69Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTactile and Sensory Interactions

The Effect of Computer-Generated Descriptions on Photo-Sharing Experiences of People with Visual Impairments

Open access
Zhao, Yuhang, Wu, Shaomei, Reynolds, Lindsay, Azenkot, Shiri·2017·Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Like sighted people, visually impaired people want to share photographs on social networking services, but find it difficult to identify and select photos from their albums. We aimed to address this problem by incorporating state-of-the-art computer-generated descriptions into Facebook's photo-sharing feature. We interviewed 12 visually impaired participants to understand their photo-sharing experiences and designed a photo description feature for the Facebook mobile application. We evaluated this feature with six participants in a seven-day diary study. We found that participants used the descriptions to recall and organize their photos, but they hesitated to upload photos without a sighted person's input. In addition to basic information about photo content, participants wanted to know more details about salient objects and people, and whether the photos reflected their personal aesthetic. We discuss these findings from the lens of self-disclosure and self-presentation theories and propose new computer vision research directions that will better support visual content sharing by visually impaired people.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3134756

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Access work is activist labor that typically opposes institutional norms.

    “Yergeau argues that access work is “activist work [that] often goes against an institutional grain” [78].”

    From Advocacy as Access Work: How People with Visual Impairments Gain Access to Digital Banking in India (2023) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Discussion (p. 8) describes barriers to accessible photo sharing and the costs of seeking sighted assistance, but does not characterize access work as activist labor opposing institutional norms. Searches for the quoted phrase and for Yergeau and institutional norms found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Y., Wu, S., Reynolds, L., & Azenkot, S.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Meta (United States) (US)
  • Cornell Tech (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2017-12-06
Volume
1
Issue
CSCW
Pages
1-22
ISSN
2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772495254
Cited by
68
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
19.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
visual impairment, image sharing, Facebook, social networking services, photo organization, self-disclosure, self-presentation, assistive technology, salient object detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review