Cited by 10Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface DesignAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

“Malicious” Pictorials: How Alt Text Matters to Screen Reader Users' Experience of Image-Dense Media

Open access
Yin, Alyson, Sogani, Riya, Oewel, Bruna, Phan, Karen, Park, Jaime Shin Young, Yeo, Mia Ashley, Yazzolino, Lindsay Ann, Arcos, Karen +4 more·2024·Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Abstract

People who are blind face accessibility and usability barriers every time a digital image author omits or creates uninformative alternative or “alt” text. Often, content creators are simply unaware of screen reader users’ experience and accessibility best practices; there is also a lack of research knowledge about how to design accessible image-dense media, like pictorials. We present (1) a content analysis of 149 pictorials, (2) a thematic analysis of three think-aloud sessions with an expert screen reader user, and (3) practical lessons learned from a co-design workshop with three blind scholars. Our research finds that pictorials are increasingly accessible, but they are still far from providing a usable experience. We identify nine “malicious” alt text patterns that riddle pictorials and three novel accessible alt text patterns to guide authors of image-dense media.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3643834.3660747

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yin, A., Sogani, R., Oewel, B., Phan, K., Park, J. S. Y., Yeo, M. A., Yazzolino, L. A., Arcos, K., Abdolrahmani, A., Blank, E., Gilbert, M. D., & Branham, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IN)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
Designing Interactive Systems Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-07
Pages
1262-1274
OpenAlex
W4400142772
Cited by
9
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4
FWCI
4.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Designing Interactive Systems Conference (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
alt text, screen readers, blind users, pictorials, accessibility, think-aloud

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review