CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examining the Unique Online Risk Experiences and Mental Health Outcomes of LGBTQ+ versus Heterosexual Youth

Tanni, Tangila Islam, Akter, Mamtaj, Anderson, Joshua, Amon, Mary Jean, Wisniewski, Pamela J.·2024·Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
DOI 10.1145/3613904.3642509
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3613904.3642509

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Results (Standardized residuals) from chi-square test showing the between-group analysis of online risk messages encountered by LGBTQ+ and heterosexual youth based on (a) risk level and (b) risk types ( N = 3023). ( ∗ ) indicates significant association. Note that green indicates a positive association, while red indicates a negative one.
Figure 1 Results (Standardized residuals) from chi-square test showing the between-group analysis of online risk messages encountered by LGBTQ+ and heterosexual youth based on (a) risk level and (b) risk types ( N = 3023). ( ∗ ) indicates significant association. Note that green indicates a positive association, while red indicates a negative one.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Moderating Effect of self-reported sexual identity on the association between online risk experiences and mental health outcomes: (a) Shows a positive relationship between harassment (X-axis) and Self-Harm/Injury (Y-axis); (b) Demonstrates a positive relationship between sexual messages (X-axis) and Mental Well-being (Y-axis) for LGBTQ+ youth. Orange and blue lines depict the moderating effect for LGBTQ+ and heterosexual youth, respectively.
Figure 2 Moderating Effect of self-reported sexual identity on the association between online risk experiences and mental health outcomes: (a) Shows a positive relationship between harassment (X-axis) and Self-Harm/Injury (Y-axis); (b) Demonstrates a positive relationship between sexual messages (X-axis) and Mental Well-being (Y-axis) for LGBTQ+ youth. Orange and blue lines depict the moderating effect for LGBTQ+ and heterosexual youth, respectively.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.011 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Roberto L Abreu, Adriana G McEachern, and Maureen C Kenny. 2017. Myths and Misconceptions about LGBTQ Youth: School Counselors’ Role in Advocacy.Journal of School Counseling 15, 8 (2017), n8. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1146191
  3. 10.1145/3411763.3451673 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1145/3579625 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/3334480.3383073 · DOI
  6. 10.1145/3500868.3559706 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/3544549.3585904 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Mamtaj Akter, Madiha Tabassum, Nazmus Sakib Miazi, Leena Alghamdi, Jess Kropczynski, Pamela J. Wisniewski, and Heather Lipford. 2023. Evaluating the Impact of Community Oversight for Managing Mobile Privacy and Security. In Nineteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2023). USENIX Association, Anaheim, CA, 437–456. https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2023/presentation/akter
  9. 10.1007/s10964-009-9397-9 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/3290605.3300367 · DOI
  11. Monica Anderson, Jingjing Jiang, 2018. Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center 31, 2018 (2018), 1673–1689.
  12. 10.4018/ijcbpl.2011010103 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/3432930 · DOI
  14. 10.1145/3544548.3580673 · DOI
  15. 10.1145/947469.947510 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/cd.23219873706 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/13620-004 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1145/3173574.3173824 · DOI
  19. 10.1145/3530987 · DOI
  20. 10.2196/26207 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/1461444817744784 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/1094428114555994 · DOI
  23. 10.1017/CBO9780511810121 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/2056305121988931 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/19359705.2013.777007 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/00224499.2012.661489 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/a0036707 · DOI
  28. 10.1145/3274313 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  30. R Frank Falk and Nancy B Miller. 1992. A primer for soft modeling.University of Akron Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1992-98610-000
  31. 10.1177/1077559509347012 · DOI
  32. 10.1145/3492834 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.009 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/jcom.12137 · DOI
  35. 10.1145/3173574.3173683 · DOI
  36. 10.48550/arXiv.2112.00107 · DOI
  37. 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Emily A. Greytak, Josephine Korchmaros, Joseph G. Kosciw, Kimberly J. Mitchell, Neal A. Palmer, and Michele L. Ybarra. 2013. Out online: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth on the Internet. New York, NY (2013). https://search.issuelab.org/resource/out-online-the-experiences-of-lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender-youth-on-the-internet.html
  39. Amy Guasp, Anne Gammon, and Gavin Ellison. 2013. Homophobic hate crime: The gay British crime survey 2013. London: Stonewall (2013).
  40. 10.1145/2675133.2675152 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/acprof:oso · DOI
  42. 10.1145/3449116 · DOI
  43. Tyler Hatchel Cagil Torgal America J. El Sheikh Luz E. Robinson Alberto Valido and Dorothy L. Espelage. 2021. LGBTQ youth and digital media: online risks. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817499-9.00015-6 · DOI
  44. Lynne Hiller, Alina Turner, and Anne Mitchell. 2005. Writing Themselves in Again: 6 Years on. The 2nd National Report on the Sexuality, Health & Well-being of Same Sex Attracted Young People in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Research Centre in Sex. Health & Society (2005). https://rainbowhealthaustralia.org.au/media/pages/research-resources/writing-themselves-in-again/2614754494-1650953507/writing_themselves_in_again.pdf
  45. 10.1177/136346070707295 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/22041451.2016.1266124 · DOI
  47. 10.1080/08974454.2021.1988034 · DOI
  48. Rex B Kline. 2023. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. https://www.guilford.com/books/Principles-and-Practice-of-Structural-Equation-Modeling/Rex-Kline/9781462551910
  49. 10.1007/s44217-022-00016-9 · DOI
  50. 10.1186/s12889-020-09677-3 · DOI
  51. Zhenqiu Lu and Ke-Hai Yuan. 2010. Welch’s t test. 1620–1623. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3057.9607 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/2005615X.2017.1313482 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Mary L McHugh. 2013. The chi-square test of independence. Biochemia medica 23, 2 (2013), 143–149. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3900058/
  54. 10.1080/15228835.2019.1617823 · DOI
  55. Ilan H Meyer. 1995. Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of health and social behavior (1995), 38–56.
  56. 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1177/20563051198261 · DOI
  58. 10.4324/9781315628110-9 · DOI
  59. 10.1080/10538720.2011.561474 · DOI
  60. Peterson K Ozili. 2023. The acceptable R-square in empirical modelling for social science research. In Social research methodology and publishing results: A guide to non-native english speakers. IGI Global 134–143. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4128165 · DOI
  61. 10.1145/3491102.3517596 · DOI
  62. 10.1145/3411764.3445331 · DOI
  63. 10.1186/s13104-020-05111-4 · DOI
  64. 10.1145/3579522 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Afsaneh Razi Ashwaq AlSoubai Seunghyun Kim Nurun Naher Shiza Ali Gianluca Stringhini Munmun De Choudhury and Pamela J Wisniewski. 2022. Instagram Data Donation: A Case Study on Collecting Ecologically Valid Social Media Data for the Purpose of Adolescent Online Risk Detection. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503569 · DOI
  66. 10.1145/3491101.3503569 · DOI
  67. 10.1145/3313831.3376400 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1145/3313831.3376400 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1145/3479609 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1145/3479609 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Erin Reed. 2023. Senator Admits "Kids Online Safety Act" Will Target Trans Content Online. https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/senator-admits-kids-online-safety
  72. 10.1080/15427609.2018.1537772 · DOI
  73. 10.1145/3361108 · DOI
  74. 10.1177/14614448231156580 · DOI
  75. Civic Space. 2017. Egypt: Crackdown on LGBTQI people and their supporters must stop. https://www.article19.org/resources/egypt-crackdown-on-lgbtqi-people-and-their-supporters-must-stop/.
  76. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.11.023 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.017 · DOI
  78. 10.1371/journal.pone.0179101 · DOI
  79. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1942-18.2018 · DOI
  80. 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1145/3461702.3462540 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.012 · DOI
  83. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.838747 · DOI
  84. 10.1145/2702123.2702240 · DOI
  85. 10.4178/epih.e2017046 · DOI
  86. Muhammad Bilal Zafar Isabel Valera Manuel Gomez Rogriguez and Krishna P Gummadi. 2017. Fairness constraints: Mechanisms for fair classification. In Artificial intelligence and statistics. PMLR 962–970. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v54/zafar17a/zafar17a.pdf
  87. 10.1037/ppm0000038 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.avb.2015.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.1016/j.pse.2016.03.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tanni, T. I., Akter, M., Anderson, J., Amon, M. J., & Wisniewski, P. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-05-11
Pages
1-21
DOI
10.1145/3613904.3642509
Cited by
27
References
18
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)
Funders
  • William T. Grant Foundation (#187941)
  • U.S. National Science Foundation (#IIP-2329976, #IIS-2333207,)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review