TS2ACT: Few-Shot Human Activity Sensing with Cross-Modal Co-Learning
Open accessAbstract
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) based on embedded sensor data has become a popular research topic in ubiquitous computing, which has a wide range of practical applications in various fields such as human-computer interaction, healthcare, and motion tracking. Due to the difficulties of annotating sensing data, unsupervised and semi-supervised HAR methods are extensively studied, but their performance gap to the fully-supervised methods is notable. In this paper, we proposed a novel cross-modal co-learning approach called TS2ACT to achieve few-shot HAR. It introduces a cross-modal dataset augmentation method that uses the semantic-rich label text to search for human activity images to form an augmented dataset consisting of partially-labeled time series and fully-labeled images. Then it adopts a pre-trained CLIP image encoder to jointly train with a time series encoder using contrastive learning, where the time series and images are brought closer in feature space if they belong to the same activity class. For inference, the feature extracted from the input time series is compared with the embedding of a pre-trained CLIP text encoder using prompt learning, and the best match is output as the HAR classification results. We conducted extensive experiments on four public datasets to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. The numerical results show that TS2ACT significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art HAR methods, and it achieves performance close to or better than the fully supervised methods even using as few as 1% labeled data for model training. The source codes of TS2ACT are publicly available on GitHub1.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 17 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
TS2ACT outperforms the other baseline models by a large margin in all few-shot cases.
“According to the results, TS2ACT outperforms the other baseline models by a large margin in all few-shot cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
TS2ACT significantly outperforms the supervised algorithms DCNN, TCN, and ConformerHAR under few-shot conditions.
“TS2ACT significantly outperforms the other supervised algorithms DCNN, TCN and ConformerHAR under few-shot conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
TS2ACT outperforms the unsupervised representation learning methods SimCLR and Multi-task deep clustering.
“TS2ACT outperforms other unsupervised representation learning methods, such as SimCLR and Multitask deep cluster”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
TS2ACT outperforms the semi-supervised representation learning method FixMatch.
“TS2ACT outperforms other semi-supervised representation learning methods such as FixMatch.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TS2ACT achieves competitive results when using the entire labeled sample set.
“It also achieves competitive results when utilizing the entire labeled samples, which demonstrates the effectiveness of TS2ACT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingnone given
TS2ACT for 1-shot learning achieves accuracy over 0.7 on all datasets.
“TS2ACT for 1-shot (i.e, using one labeled samples for each class) achieves accuracy over 0.7 on all datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
TS2ACT even outperforms the supervised algorithms when using the full labeled dataset in some cases.
“It even outperforms them when using the full labeled dataset for model training in some cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The performance gain is more than a factor of 2 in scenarios with an extremely limited number of labeled samples.
“The performance is significantly improved, with a performance gain of more than a factor of 2 in scenarios with an extremely limited number of labeled samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For 20-shot learning, TS2ACT's performance is close to or better than fully-supervised methods trained with all labeled samples.
“which is close to or better than the performance of fully-supervised methods when all labeled samples are used to train their models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TS2ACT achieves performance close to or better than fully supervised methods even when using as few as 1% labeled data for model training.
“it achieves performance close to or better than the fully supervised methods even using as few as 1% labeled data for model training.”
- Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · plain
“it performs closely to the fully supervised methods even using labeled data as few as 1% of the training dataset.”
- Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · plain
“it performs close to or better than the fully supervised methods using as few as 1% labeled data for model training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · plain
- Findingown data
For 20-shot learning, TS2ACT achieves accuracy and F1-score ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 on all datasets.
“For 20-shot learning, TS2ACT achieves accuracy and F1-score ranging from 0.88-0.92 on all datasets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compared with ConformerHAR on the PAMAP2 dataset, TS2ACT improves performance across almost all activities.
“our model demonstrates improved performance across almost all activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TS2ACT significantly outperforms state-of-the-art human activity recognition methods under few-shot conditions.
“The numerical results show that TS2ACT significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art HAR methods”
- Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · plain
“The numerical results show that TS2ACT significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art HAR methods, and it performs closely to the fully supervised methods even using labeled data as few as 1% of the training dataset.”
- Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · plain
“It is showed that TS2ACT significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art HAR methods under fewshot conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · plain
- Findingown data
As the percentage of labeled samples increases, the models achieve higher accuracy.
“As the percentage of labeled samples increases, the models can achieve higher accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
TS2ACT consistently outperforms other models in all cases across different percentages of labeled samples.
“The results show that TS2ACT consistently outperforms other models in all cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
As the number of images increases, the recognition performance of the model increases.
“It shows that as the number of images increases, the recognition performance of the model also increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TS2ACT produces informative features that cluster human activities well with few labeled data.
“It can be seen that the proposed TS2ACT can generate informative features that cluster human activities effectively using a small amount of labeled data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Even with only a few labeled data, TS2ACT demonstrates outstanding recognition capabilities.
“Even with only a few labeled data, TS2ACT demonstrates outstanding recognition capabilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Image augmentation performs significantly better than text augmentation on the four datasets.
“According to the results, image augmentation performs significantly better than text augmentation on the four datasets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across four public datasets, TS2ACT substantially outperforms state-of-the-art human activity recognition methods.
“Extensive experiments based on four public datasets showed that TS2ACT significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art HAR methods”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Even when labeled data are limited, TS2ACT achieves performance comparable to fully supervised models.
“Even when the labeled data samples are limited, the proposed method can achieve comparable performance with the fully supervised models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
As the number of Transformer blocks increases, performance initially increases and then degrades after reaching some number.
“It shows that as the number of Transformer blocks increases, the performance of the model increases at the beginning.After reaching some number, the performance degrades when the blocks increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The smaller the percentage of labeled samples, the larger the performance gap between TS2ACT and other models.
“And the smaller percentage of labeled samples, the bigger the performance gap between TS2ACT and other models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With only a small number of labeled samples, TS2ACT matches or exceeds fully supervised methods.
“it performed close to or better than the fully supervised methods even using a small number of labeled samples”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When the number of images reaches 40, the performance of the model gradually converges.
“When the number of images reaches 40, the performance of the model gradually converges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The cross-modal prompt-learning inference method enables efficient activity recognition without training an additional classifier.
“we propose a cross-modal method using prompt learning to enable efficient inference.This approach effectively utilizes the embeddings encoded by the TS encoder along with a pre-traind CLIP text encoder for activity recognition without additional training of a classifier.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Four publicly available datasets cover a wide variety of device types and activity recognition tasks in different environments.
“We consider four publicly available datasets that cover a wide variety of device types and activity recognition tasks in different environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The labeled contrastive loss causes the time-series encoder to learn embeddings that are close to those produced by the CLIP image encoder.
“L 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡 enables the TS encoder to learn embeddings that are close to those generated by the CLIP image encoder”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Adding prompts to label text before encoding it with the CLIP text encoder improves classification accuracy.
“To enhance the classification accuracy, we augment the original label text (i.e., 𝐿 1 , 𝐿 2 , 𝐿 3 , ..., 𝐿 𝐾 ) with prompts before feeding it to the CLIP text encoder.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
HHAR covers 36 smart devices of 13 models from 4 manufacturers with varying sampling rates.
“The dataset covers a diverse set of devices, including 36 smart devices of 13 models from 4 manufacturers, with varying sampling rates to accommodate heterogeneous data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The time series encoder learns to map input time series into a feature space close to that of the CLIP image encoder.
“In this way, the TS encoder learns to map the input time series into the feature space close to that of the CLIP image encoder.”
- Also stated in: § 3.3.4 Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning. · plain
“the TS encoder learns to encode time series data into a feature space closely aligned with that of the image encoder.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.3.4 Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning. · plain
- Interpretationown data
With the augmented semantic-rich image dataset and pre-trained CLIP encoders, sensor-based human activity recognition can be fulfilled with very few labeled samples.
“With the help of the augmented semanticrich image dataset and the pre-trained CLIP encoders, the sensor-based human activity recognition task can be fulfilled with very few labeled samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The labels of human activities contain rich semantic information that can be used as keywords to search for images sharing the same labels.
- Interpretationreasoning
The unlabeled contrastive loss enables the model to use unlabeled data to improve feature extraction by the time-series encoder.
“L 𝑢𝑛𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡 enables the model to fully leverage unlabeled data to further enhance feature extraction for the TS encoder.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
With co-learning on time-series and image visual features, the time-series encoder embeddings can be aligned to label text for accurate classification.
“Furthermore, with the proposed co-learning on time series features and image visual features, the embedding generated by the TS encoder can be cued to the label text for accurate classification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Because of CLIP's text-image matching pre-training, the text encoder generates embeddings near the matched image embeddings.
- Interpretationreasoning
Images can be used to train a cross-modal classifier to compensate for the shortage of labeled samples.
“The image can be used to train a crossmodal classifier to make up the shortage of labeled samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The labels of human activities contain rich semantic information that can be used as keywords to search for images sharing the same labels.
- Interpretationown data
TS2ACT extracts informative features that are more discriminative among different activity classes because of contrastive learning.
“The proposed TS2ACT can extract informative features that are more discriminative among different activity classes, thanks to the power of contrastive learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The proposed co-learning method effectively associates diverse types of multimodal data to enhance the comprehension of human activities.
“The proposed co-learning method effectively associates diverse types of multimodal data to enhance the comprehension of human activities, demonstrating the power of using multimodal data joint training approaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The cause of this limitation is that the pretrained image classifier cannot handle unseen classes.
“The limitation is caused by the pretrained image classifier that cannot deal with unseen classes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Augmenting with static images cannot represent complex sequential activities that involve multiple processes.
“the proposed method augments dataset with static image, which fails to describe complex sequential activities involving multiple processes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When lambda is too small, the model pays more attention to supervised learning and cannot effectively use the large amount of unlabeled data.
“When 𝜆 is too small, the model pays more attention to supervised learning, which is unable to effectively use the large amount of unlabeled data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In text augmentation, having only one label text per class limits the number of augmented samples.
“In text augmentation, since there is only one label text for each class, the augmented samples are rather limit even the synonyms of a word are counted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
TS2ACT may output incorrect results for activities that CLIP has not seen.
“When encountering activities that are unseen by CLIP, the proposed method could produce wrong results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because TS2ACT strengthens semantic features via images, its inability to capture activity direction is a limitation.
“Since our approach enhances semantic features through images, the lack of directional information for activities becomes a limitation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Many activities look visually similar yet are distinct, and sensor data can measure them.
- Interpretationreasoning
When lambda is large, the model pays more attention to unsupervised learning and cannot effectively use supervision from the labeled time-series data.
“When 𝜆 is large, the model pays more attention to unsupervised learning, which makes it unable to effectively use supervision from the labeled TS data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
TS2ACT would likely fail on temporally opposite activities.
“Applying TS2ACT to recognize such temporally opposite activities probably lead to failure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Many activities look visually similar yet are distinct, and sensor data can measure them.
- May combine two claims. 20
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTS2ACT achieves accuracy as high as 95% and even 100% in certain classes with only 1% labeled data.
“the proposed TS2ACT method achieves accuracy rates as high as 95% and even 100% in certain classes (e.g., lying, walking, jogging, cycling, etc) with only 1% labeled data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTS2ACT has the highest accuracy and F1-score on all datasets under all few-shot conditions and also achieves competitive results when using the entire labeled sample set.
“TS2ACT has the highest accuracy and F1-score on all dataset under all few-shot conditions and also achieves competitive results when utilizing the entire labeled samples”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenDescending stairs is easily recognized as ascending stairs, achieving the lowest accuracy of 0.63 on the PAMAP2 dataset.
“The activity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor ascending and descending stairs on PAMAP2, TS2ACT improves around 43% and 28% respectively over ConformerHAR.
“for activities like”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataSitting and standing are confused with each other on the UCI-HAR and HHAR datasets.
“A part of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenUnsupervised and semi-supervised HAR methods lag notably behind fully supervised methods.
“the existing unsupervised and semi-supervised HAR methods have notable performance gap to the fully-supervised methods”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe t-SNE visualization shows that some categories are not effectively separated by baseline models, making some activities indistinguishable in the latent space.
“there are some categories that are not effectively separated by the baseline models, which leads to some activities that are indistinguishable from each other in the latent space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTS2ACT is almost close to convergence when using 1% labeled data, and even 0.5% labeled data for UCI-HAR.
“our method is almost close to convergence when using 1% labeled data (even 0.5% labeled data for UCI-HAR dataset)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataDifferent prompt templates lead to performance variance, and the prompt 'an action of [class]' has the best performance.
“The difference in prompt will also lead to performance variance, among which”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMotionSense data were captured with an iPhone 6s placed in the front pocket, and each participant performed six activities in 15 trials.
“The data was captured using an iPhone 6s, which was placed in the front pocket of each user.During the data collection, each participant performed six different activities (Walking, Jogging, Downstairs, Upstairs, Sitting, and Standing) in 15 trials, all under similar settings and conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe HHAR dataset contains accelerometer and gyroscope signals from smartphones and smartwatches for six activities.
“The Heterogeneity Human Activity Recognition (HHAR) dataset contains signals from two sensors (accelerometer and gyroscope) in smartphones and smartwatches, capturing data for six different activities: Biking, Sitting, Standing, Walking, Stair Up, and Stair Down.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationConformerHAR achieved state-of-the-art performance on a variety of HAR datasets.
“As a result, they achieved SOTA performance on a variety of HAR datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSimCLR learns useful features through contrastive learning with random transformations and a shared convolutional neural network.
“The idea of SimCLR is to learn useful features through contrastive learning.The algorithm augments input data with random transformations (such as flipping, cropping, rotating, etc.) and uses a shared convolutional neural network to extract features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe UCI-HAR dataset was collected from thirty volunteers aged 19 to 48 who wore smartphones on their waists while performing six basic activities.
“The UCI-HAR dataset was collected from thirty volunteers aged 19 to 48, who wore smartphones (Samsung Galaxy S II) on their waists to perform six basic activities: Standing, Sitting, Lying down, Walking, Descending stairs, and Ascending stairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFixMatch is a semi-supervised framework that generates pseudo-labels for unlabeled data through self-supervised learning for data augmentation.
“FixMatch is a semi-supervised learning framework.It generates pseudo-labels for large amounts of unlabeled data via self-supervised learning methods for data augmentation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPAMAP2 comprises data from 12 physical activities performed by 9 subjects wearing 3 inertial measurement units and a heart rate monitor.
“The PAMAP2 Physical Activity Monitoring dataset comprises data from 12 distinct physical activities, including walking, cycling, playing soccer, and more.These activities were performed by 9 subjects wearing 3 inertial measurement units and a heart rate monitor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe UCI-HAR dataset includes accelerometer and gyroscope data sampled at 50 Hz.
“The dataset includes accelerometer and gyroscope data acquired at a constant sampling rate of 50 Hz.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe MotionSense dataset comprises accelerometer, gyroscope, and altitude data from 24 participants.
“The MotionSense dataset comprises accelerometer, gyroscope, and altitude data collected from 24 participants with varying age, gender, weight, and height.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTCN combines dilated convolutions and residual connections with causal convolutions for autoregressive prediction and outperforms LSTMs and GRUs.
“TCN combines the best practices such as dilated convolutions and residual connections with causal convolutions for autoregressive prediction.According to the literature, it significantly outperforms common recurrent architectures such as LSTMs and GRUs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe CLIP text encoder is an architecturally modified Transformer based on GPT-2.
“The CLIP text encoder is also an architecturally modified Transformer [56] in GPT-2 [38]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [56]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn HHAR, nine participants performed scripted activities for 5 minutes with an equal distribution of categories.
“In total, nine participants performed scripted activities for 5 minutes, ensuring an equal distribution of categories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMDC uses a CNN-BiLSTM autoencoder, K-means clustering for pseudo-labels, and a DNN for human activity recognition.
“Multi-task deep clustering algorithm uses an autoencoder based on CNN-BiLSTM architecture to form a latent feature representation.The K-means clustering algorithm is then applied to divide the dataset into different groups for generating pseudo-labels.Finally, a deep neural network (DNN) is further trained for human activity recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenTo the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first work to introduce label semantics for cross-modal dataset augmentation and to apply time series-image contrastive learning with a pre-trained image classifier to achieve few-shot human activity recognition.
“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to introduce label semantic for cross-modal dataset augmentation and apply time series-image contrastive learning with a pre-trained image classifier to achieve few-shot HAR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The labels of human activities contain rich semantic information that can be used as keywords to search for images sharing the same labels.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSSL predicts time-series transformations by training eight proxy tasks and uses a self-supervised model for automatic feature extraction.
“Self-supervised learning predicts time series transformations by training eight proxy tasks and employs a self-supervised model for automatic feature extraction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenPre-trained models still require a sufficient number of labeled samples for fine-tuning, making it difficult to achieve good performance in few-shot conditions where labeled samples per class are limited.
“Secondly, the pre-trained model still requires sufficient number of labeled samples for fine-tuning, making it hard to achieve good performance in the few-shot condition where labeled samples for each class are rather limited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDCNN uses a deep CNN for automatic feature learning from raw signals and outperforms SVM and KNN.
“DCNN employs a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic feature learning from raw input signals.According to the literature, it outperforms many traditional methods, including support vector machines (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithm (KNN).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe proposed method integrates labeled text, images, and time series, uses unlabeled and cross-modal information to reduce the demand for labeled data, and thereby mitigates data scarcity in sensing-based human activity recognition.
“The proposed method integrates labeled text, images, and time series, effectively leveraging unlabeled data and cross-modal information to reduce the demand for labeled data, thus effectively mitigating data scarcity issues in sensing-based human activity recognition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Annotating large amounts of sensing data is impractical and unrealistic in real-world situations.
- Rests on an assumption: Certain scenarios, such as privacy-sensitive data or dangerous activities, make accurate human activity annotation impossible.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNoise in the input data may make deeper networks harder to generalize, and more parameters may lead to overfitting.
“The reason may be that noise in the input data makes it harder for deeper networks to generalize, and more parameters in the model may lead to overfitting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn image augmentation, label text can be used to search for many semantically similar images to augment the dataset, resulting in significant performance improvement for few-shot HAR.
“In the proposed image augmentation, the label text can be used to search for as many images (with similar semantic) as needed to augment the dataset, resulting in a significant performance improvement for HAR with few-shots.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Only a small amount of labeled samples is available, making it difficult to train a deep classification model to extract informative features from raw sensor signals.
“Since only a small amount of labeled sample is available, it is difficult to train a deep classification model to extract informative feature from raw sensor signals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Manual annotation of sensing data requires extensive long-term observations and significant human resources.
“Manual annotation of the sensing data demands extensive long-term observations and significant human resources.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Certain scenarios, such as privacy-sensitive data or dangerous activities, make it impossible to annotate human activity accurately.
“Moreover, certain scenarios, such as privacy-sensitive data or dangerous activities, make it impossible to annotate human activity accurately.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Collecting labeled sensor data from wearable devices is a costly and challenging process.
“Consequently, the collection of labeled sensor data from wearable devices is a costly and challenging process, hampering the direct application of supervised deep learning approaches at scale.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Existing semi-supervised and unsupervised human activity recognition solutions still exhibit a noticeable performance gap compared to fully supervised solutions.
“However, these solutions still exhibit a noticeable performance gap when compared to fully-supervised solutions”
The paper relies on this without support.
Deep learning-based human activity recognition methods rely on a large amount of labeled data for training.
“A major drawback of deep learning-based HAR methods is their reliance on a large amount of labeled data for training the model.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The labels of human activities contain rich semantic information that can be used as keywords to search for images sharing the same labels.
“Since the labels of the human activities contain rich semantic information (such as”
The paper relies on this without support.
Because of CLIP's text-image matching pre-training, the text encoder generates embeddings near the matched image embeddings.
“Intuitively, during to the pre-training task of CLIP's text-image matching, the text encoder will generate embeddings in the neighborhood of the matched image embeddings.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Annotating large amounts of sensing data is impractical and unrealistic in real-world situations.
“In real-world situations, annotating a large number of sensing data becomes impractical and unrealistic.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Certain scenarios, such as privacy-sensitive data or dangerous activities, make accurate human activity annotation impossible.
“Moreover, certain scenarios, such as privacy-sensitive data or dangerous activities, make it impossible to annotate human activity accurately.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Unsupervised pre-training tasks and downstream tasks are heterogeneous, causing a mismatch that harms downstream classification accuracy.
“Although unsupervised pre-training can effectively utilize a large amount of unlabeled time series data, the heterogeneity between unsupervised pre-training tasks and downstream tasks leads to the mismatch problem that harms the accuracy of the downstream classification tasks.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Incorrect pseudo-labels cause the model's performance to drop.
“Meanwhile, incorrect pseudo-labels will cause the model performance to drop.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many activities look visually similar yet are distinct, and sensor data can measure them.
“there are many activities that may appear visually similar but are distinct and can be measured through sensor data”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If no annotated data are available for unseen activities, cross-modal contrastive training (e.g., between sensor data and videos/text descriptions) is a good option.
“However, if no annotated data are available for the unseen activities, cross-modal contrastive training (e.g., between sensor data and videos/text descriptions) is a good option [61,82,135,201].”
From Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging Task (2025) · cites this paper as [201]
The Introduction and §3.3.4 describe contrastive training between sensor time series and images to reduce the need for labeled sensor data. But TS2ACT assumes a few labeled examples in each activity class, rather than none for unseen activities. Section 5.2 treats video-based sensing as future work and warns that the method can fail on activities unseen by its pretrained image encoder. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Twenty-shot results exceed the stated range
MinorThe stated 0.88-0.92 range does not cover several Table 2 results, including PAMAP2 accuracy of 0.943 and F1-score of 0.941.
“For 20-shot learning, TS2ACT achieves accuracy and F1-score ranging from 0.88-0.92 on all datasets”
“| TS2ACT | 20 | 0.924 0.922 0.921 0.887 0.886 0.888 0.926 0.917 0.916 0.943 0.936 0.941 |”
One-shot PAMAP2 accuracy is below the claimed threshold
MinorThe claim says one-shot accuracy exceeds 0.7 on every dataset, but Table 2 reports 0.692 for PAMAP2.
“• TS2ACT for 1-shot (i.e, using one labeled samples for each class) achieves accuracy over 0.7 on all datasets.”
“| TS2ACT | 1 | 0.758 0.757 0.758 0.711 0.701 0.703 0.747 0.744 0.743 0.692 0.697 0.676 |”
Results section counts three datasets instead of four
MinorThe results section says Table 2 covers three datasets, while the table names UCI-HAR, HHAR, MotionSense, and PAMAP2.
“The numerical results of the compared models on the three datasets are shown in Table 2.”
“| Dataset | | UCI-HAR | | HHAR | | MotionSense | | PAMAP2 |”
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051 · see citing works
An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11929 · Cited by 21,793 · see citing works
Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning
He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00975 · Cited by 13,347 · see citing works
An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling
Bai, S., Kolter, J. Z., & Koltun, V. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.01271 · Cited by 4,655 · see citing works
Tian, Y., Krishnan, D., & Isola, P. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58621-8_45 · Cited by 1,997 · see citing works
(2013) · RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · Cited by 1,959 · see citing works
Introducing a New Benchmarked Dataset for Activity Monitoring
Reiss, A., & Stricker, D. (2012) · 2012 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers · doi:10.1109/iswc.2012.13 · Cited by 1,456 · see citing works
Stisen, A., Blunck, H., Bhattacharya, S., Prentow, T. S., Kjærgaard, M. B., Dey, A., Sonne, T., & Jensen, M. M. (2015) · Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems · doi:10.1145/2809695.2809718 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Ensembles of Deep LSTM Learners for Activity Recognition using Wearables
Guan, Y., & Plötz, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3090076 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
SegNeXt: Rethinking Convolutional Attention Design for Semantic Segmentation
Guo, M.-H., Lu, C.-Z., Hou, Q., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.08575 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
GroupViT: Semantic Segmentation Emerges from Text Supervision
Xu, J., Mello, S. D., Liu, S., Byeon, W., Breuel, T. M., Kautz, J., & Wang, X. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01760 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
DanceTrack: Multi-Object Tracking in Uniform Appearance and Diverse Motion
Sun, P., Cao, J., Jiang, Y., Yuan, Z., Bai, S., Kitani, K., & Luo, P. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.02032 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Multi-task Self-Supervised Learning for Human Activity Detection
Saeed, A., Ozcelebi, T., & Lukkien, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3328932 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Elderly activities recognition and classification for applications in assisted living
Chernbumroong, S., Cang, S., Atkins, A. S., & Yu, H. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.09.004 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Palipana, S., Rojas, D., Agrawal, P., & Pesch, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3161183 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
MeMOT: Multi-Object Tracking with Memory
Cai, J., Xu, M., Li, W., Xiong, Y., Xia, W., Tu, Z., & Soatto, S. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00792 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Self-citationTemporal segmentation and activity classification from first-person sensing
Spriggs, E., la Torre, F. D., & Hebert, M. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2009.5204354 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Multiscale Deep Feature Learning for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors
Tang, Y., Zhang, L., Min, F., & He, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2022.3161812 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Rahate, A., Walambe, R., Ramanna, S., & Kotecha, K. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.12.003 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
IoT-Based Smart Health Monitoring System for COVID-19
Bhardwaj, V., Joshi, R., & Gaur, A. M. (2022) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-022-01015-1 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Protecting sensory data against sensitive inferences
Malekzadeh, M., Clegg, R. G., Cavallaro, A., & Haddadi, H. (2018) · Spiral (Imperial College London) · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Protecting Sensory Data against Sensitive Inferences
Malekzadeh, M., Clegg, R. G., Cavallaro, A., & Haddadi, H. (2018) · Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Privacy by Design in Distributed Systems · doi:10.1145/3195258.3195260 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and TaxonomyPreprint
Baltrušaitis, T., Ahuja, C., & Morency, L. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.09406 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Soleimani, E., & Nazerfard, E. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.10.056 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
SelfHAR: Improving Human Activity Recognition through Self-training with Unlabeled Data
Tang, C. I., Perez-Pozuelo, I., Spathis, D., Brage, S., Wareham, N., & Mascolo, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3448112 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Semantics-Aware Adaptive Knowledge Distillation for Sensor-to-Vision Action Recognition
Liu, Y., Wang, K., Li, G., & Lin, L. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2021.3086590 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
An sEMG-Based Human–Robot Interface for Robotic Hands Using Machine Learning and Synergies
Meattini, R., Benatti, S., Scarcia, U., De Gregorio, D., Benini, L., & Melchiorri, C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1109/tcpmt.2018.2799987 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables
Haresamudram, H., Essa, I., & Plötz, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3550299 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
MMAct: A Large-Scale Dataset for Cross Modal Human Action Understanding
Kong, Q., Wu, Z., Deng, Z., Klinkigt, M., Tong, B., & Murakami, T. (2019) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00875 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Contrastive Self-supervised Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition
Khaertdinov, B., Ghaleb, E., & Asteriadis, S. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) · doi:10.1109/ijcb52358.2021.9484410 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
An effective approach for human activity recognition on smartphone
Paul, P., & George, T. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1109/icetech.2015.7275024 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Incremental Learning in Human Action Recognition Based on Snippets
Minhas, R., Mohammed, A. A., & Wu, Q. M. J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2011.2177182 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Kamminga, J. W., Le, D. V., Meijers, J. P., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3191747 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Human Activity Recognition Based On Convolutional Neural Network
Xu, W., Pang, Y., Yang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2018) · Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr.2018.8545435 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Wang, C., Liu, J., Chen, Y., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3191773 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards Low-Cost Sign Language Gesture Recognition Leveraging Wearables
Zhao, T., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Liu, H., & Chen, Y. J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2019.2962760 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Unsupervised Human Activity Representation Learning with Multi-task Deep Clustering
Ma, H., Zhang, Z., Li, W., & Lu, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3448074 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationUltrasound based gesture recognition
(2017) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2017.7952187 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Leveraging Activity Recognition to Enable Protective Behavior Detection in Continuous Data
Wang, C., Gao, Y., Mathur, A., Williams, A. C. D. C., Lane, N. D., & Bianchi‐Berthouze, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3463508 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Zero-Shot Learning for IMU-Based Activity Recognition Using Video Embeddings
Tong, C., Ge, J., & Lane, N. D. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3494995 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Bootstrapping Human Activity Recognition Systems for Smart Homes from Scratch
Hiremath, S. K., Nishimura, Y., Chernova, S., & Plötz, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3550294 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Inertial-Measurement-Unit-Based Novel Human Activity Recognition Algorithm Using Conformer
Kim, Y.-W., Cho, W.-H., Kim, K.-S., & Lee, S. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22103932 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Learning Disentangled Behaviour Patterns for Wearable-based Human Activity Recognition
Su, J., Wen, Z., Lin, T., & Guan, Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3517252 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Weakly Supervised Multi-Task Representation Learning for Human Activity Analysis Using Wearables
Sheng, T., & Huber, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3397330 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Jones, S. L., Hue, W., Kelly, R., Barnett, R., Henderson, V., & Sengupta, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3448093 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Augmented Adversarial Learning for Human Activity Recognition with Partial Sensor Sets
Kang, H., Huang, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3550285 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Multi-Layer Cross Loss Model for Zero-Shot Human Activity Recognition
Wu, T., Chen, Y., Gu, Y., et al. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47426-3_17 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Predicting Performance Improvement of Human Activity Recognition Model by Additional Data Collection
Tanigaki, K., Teoh, T. C., Yoshimura, N., Maekawa, T., & Hara, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3550319 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Gupta, P., & Caleb-Solly, P. (2018) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98204-5_1 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Baseline Model Training in Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition: An Incremental Learning Approach
Xiao, J., Chen, L., Chen, H., & Hong, X. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3077764 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Cross-Modality Graph-based Language and Sensor Data Co-Learning of Human-Mobility Interaction
Tabatabaie, M., He, S., & Shin, K. G. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3610904 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
OpenAI, Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08774
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Ting Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, and Geoffrey Hinton. 2020. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 1597--1607.
- Francesco Daghero, Daniele Jahier Pagliari, and Massimo Poncino. 2022. Two-stage Human Activity Recognition on Microcontrollers with Decision Trees and CNNs. In 2022 17th Conference on Ph. D Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (PRIME). IEEE, 173--176.
- Shohreh Deldari, Hao Xue, Aaqib Saeed, Daniel V. Smith, and Flora D. Salim. 2022. COCOA: Cross Modality Contrastive Learning for Sensor Data. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 6, 3, Article 108 (sep 2022), 28 pages.
- 10.1145/3090076 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3550294 · DOI
- Johannes Meyer, Adrian Frank, Thomas Schlebusch, and Enkeljeda Kasneci. 2022. A CNN-Based Human Activity Recognition System Combining a Laser Feedback Interferometry Eye Movement Sensor and an IMU for Context-Aware Smart Glasses. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 5, 4, Article 172 (dec 2022), 24 pages.
- Xin Qin, Yiqiang Chen, Jindong Wang, and Chaohui Yu. 2020. Cross-Dataset Activity Recognition via Adaptive Spatial-Temporal Transfer Learning. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 4, Article 148 (sep 2020), 25 pages.
- Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. 2021. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 8748--8763.
- Kihyuk Sohn, David Berthelot, Nicholas Carlini, Zizhao Zhang, Han Zhang, Colin A Raffel, Ekin Dogus Cubuk, Alexey Kurakin, and Chun-Liang Li. 2020. Fixmatch: Simplifying semi-supervised learning with consistency and confidence. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 596--608.
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
- Jianbo Yang, Minh Nhut Nguyen, Phyo Phyo San, Xiaoli Li, and Shonali Krishnaswamy. 2015. Deep convolutional neural networks on multichannel time series for human activity recognition.. In International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 15. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3995--4001.
- Han Zhou, Yi Gao, Xinyi Song, Wenxin Liu, and Wei Dong. 2020. LimbMotion: Decimeter-Level Limb Tracking for Wearable-Based Human-Computer Interaction. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 4, Article 161 (sep 2020), 24 pages.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transfer Learning in Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition: A Survey
Dhekane, S. G., & Ploetz, T. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3717608 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Haresamudram, H., Tang, C. I., Suh, S., Lukowicz, P., & Plötz, T. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3729467 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Multi-modal data clustering using deep learning: A systematic review
Raya, S. P., Orabi, M., Afyouni, I., & Aghbari, Z. A. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128348 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
GOAT: A Generalized Cross-Dataset Activity Recognition Framework with Natural Language Supervision
Miao, S., & Chen, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3699736 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Federated Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for mmWave-Based Human Activity Recognition
Zhao, C., Fang, G., Ding, H., Liu, X., Wang, F., Wang, G., Zhao, K., Wang, Z., & Xi, W. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3549705 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Zheng, W., & Arakawa, Y. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3598088 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Liu, X., Cheng, D., Fu, Z., Zhang, L., Wu, H., & Song, A. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2026.3664424 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Zhang, W., Ye, N., Zhang, L., Liu, X., Wu, H., & Song, A. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3639422 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
ActiFormer: Sign-Aware Linear Attention for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition
Sun, Q., Fu, Z., Zhang, L., Chen, G., Huang, W., Wu, H., & Song, A. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3633705 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Towards Customizable Foundation Models for Human Activity Recognition with Wearable Devices
Qiu, M., Weng, C., Fan, M., & Wu, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3749479 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Weak-Annotation of HAR Datasets using Vision Foundation Models
Bock, M., Laerhoven, K. V., & Moeller, M. (2024) · ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC) · doi:10.1145/3675095.3676613 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Liu, X., Yuan, G., Zhang, Y., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2025.3588988 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
mmZeAR: Zero-Effort Cross-Category Action Recognition With mmWave Radar
Sheng, B., Li, J., Cai, H., Zuo, Y., Lü, L., & Xiao, F. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3573168 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Text Descriptions of Actions and Objects Improve Action Anticipation
Beedu, A., Haresamudram, H., & Essa, I. A. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10888324 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
da Silva, J. C. F., Silva, M., Amorim, V. J. P., Lazaroni, P. S. D. O., & Oliveira, R. (2025) · Brazilian Symposium on Computing System Engineering (SBESC) · doi:10.1109/sbesc68008.2025.11288835
Fast Adapting Few-Shot Federated Learning System for Human Activity Recognition
Zhang, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2024) · IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications (ISPA) · doi:10.1109/ispa63168.2024.00264
Lin, M., Huang, T., Ding, H., et al. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2026.3673171
- Authors
- Xia, K., Li, W., Gan, S., & Lu, S.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
- Published
- 2023-12-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 2474-9567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390798810
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61972196)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Keywords
- human activity recognition, few-shot learning, time series, CLIP, contrastive learning, prompt learning, wearable sensors, unsupervised learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review