Cited by 214Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMultisensory perception and integration

Multimodal Co-learning: Challenges, applications with datasets, recent advances and future directions

Open access
Rahate, Anil, Walambe, Rahee, Ramanna, Sheela, Kotecha, Ketan·2022·Information Fusion

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.12.003

Cites

236 of 236 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expert capacity management strategies regulate the processing abilities of individual experts by setting thresholds on the number of tokens each can handle, effectively averting bottlenecks and ensuring more efficient model operation, leading to improved training processes and heightened performance during complex computational tasks.

    “Concurrently, the integration of expert capacity management strategies, emerges as a crucial approach in MoE models to regulate the processing abilities of individual experts by setting thresholds on the number of tokens each can handle, effectively averting bottlenecks and ensuring a more efficient and streamlined model operation, leading to improved training processes and heightened performance”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [46][46] Y. Cheng, X. Zhao, R. Cai, Z. Li, K. Huang, Y. Rui, Semi-supervised multimodal deep learning for RGB-D object recognition, IJCAI Int. Jt. Conf. Artif. Intell. 2016-Janua (2016) 3345-3351. -
  2. [171][171] T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. Corrado, J. Dean, Distributed Representations ofWords and Phrases and their Compositionality, in: Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 26 (NIPS 2013), 2013: pp. 3111-3119. -
  3. [178][178] L. Shi, K. Shuang, S. Geng, P. Su, Z. Jiang, P. Gao, Z. Fu, G. de Melo, S. Su, Contrastive VisualLinguistic Pretraining, ArXiv. (2020) 1-11. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahate, A., Walambe, R., Ramanna, S., & Kotecha, K.
Affiliations
  • Symbiosis International University (IN)
  • The University of Winnipeg (CA)
Corresponding author
Kotecha, Ketan
Venue
Information Fusion
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
81
Pages
203-239
ISSN
1566-2535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3184679245
Cited by
214
References
226
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 20
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Fusion (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
multimodal learning, cross-modal knowledge transfer, missing modalities, cross-modal representation learning, cross-modal alignment, cross-modal fusion, multi-view learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review