The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Support Autonomy: Exploring Player Perspectives on AI-Supported Onboarding in Video Games
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Generative AI and ChatGPT: applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration
Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., & Chen, L. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research · doi:10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814 · Cited by 1,363
Campbell, M., Hoane, A. J., & Hsu, F.-H. (2002) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(01)00129-1 · Cited by 1,226
The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology
Willig, C., & Rogers, W. S. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781526405555 · Cited by 1,035
Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning
van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_2 · Cited by 857
Achieving Saturation in Thematic Analysis: Development and Refinement of a Codebook
Ando, H., Cousins, R., & Young, C. (2014) · Comprehensive Psychology · doi:10.2466/03.cp.3.4 · Cited by 577
Organizational socialization: The effective onboarding of new employees.
Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (2011) · APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization. · doi:10.1037/12171-002 · Cited by 370
Kabir, S., Udo-Imeh, D. N., Kou, B., & Zhang, T. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642596 · Cited by 160
Do People Engage Cognitively with AI? Impact of AI Assistance on Incidental Learning
Gajos, K. Z., & Mamykina, L. (2022) · 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3490099.3511138 · Cited by 127
Park, H., & Ahn, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642785 · Cited by 84
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.1145/2207676.2207687 · DOI · Paper page
- Batu Aytemiz Xueer Shu Eric Hu and Adam Smith. 2020. Your Buddy the Grandmaster: Repurposing the Game-Playing AI Surplus for Inclusivity. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment 16 11 (Oct. 2020) 17–23. 10.1609/aiide.v16i1.7402 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-25324-9_30 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25324-9_30
- Petra M Boynton. 1998. People should participate in not be subjects of research. BMJ: British Medical Journal 317 7171 (1998) 1521. · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7171.1521a
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology 18 3 (July 2021) 328–352. 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 · DOI · Paper page
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health 13 2 (March 2021) 201–216. 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846 · DOI · Paper page
- Shuangyuan Cao and Fang Liu. 2022. Learning to play: Understanding in-game tutorials with a pilot study on implicit tutorials. Heliyon 8 11 (Nov. 2022) e11482. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11482 · DOI
- Yang Chen Jian Ou and David M. Whittinghill. 2015. Cognitive Load in Real-Time Strategy Gaming: Human Opponent Versus AI Opponent. The Computer Games Journal 4 1 (June 2015) 19–30. 10.1007/s40869-015-0002-z · DOI
- 10.1145/2658537.2658540 · DOI
- Victoria Clarke and Virginia Braun. 2017. Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology 12 3 (May 2017) 297–298. 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_5 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_5
- 10.1145/3167918.3167937 · DOI
- Vanessa Paz Dennen. 2013. Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Routledge, New York, 804–819.
- 10.1145/1358628.1358827 · doi:10.1145/1358628.1358827
- 10.1007/978-3-319-15985-0_8 · DOI
- Tjitske J. E. Faber Mary E. W. Dankbaar Rob Kickert Walter W. van den Broek and Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer. 2023. Identifying indicators to guide adaptive scaffolding in games. Learning and Instruction 83 (Feb. 2023) 101666. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101666 · DOI
- 10.1145/3544548.3581409 · DOI
- Xin Fu Xi Chen Yu-Tong Shi Indranil Bose and Shun Cai. 2017. User segmentation for retention management in online social games. Decision Support Systems 101 (Sept. 2017) 51–68. 10.1016/j.dss.2017.05.015 · DOI
- James Paul Gee. 2005. Learning by Design: Good Video Games as Learning Machines. E-Learning and Digital Media 2 1 (March 2005) 5–16. 10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3235765.3235790 · DOI
- 10.1145/3235765.3235820 · DOI
- Monique Hennink and Bonnie N. Kaiser. 2022. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine 292 (Jan. 2022) 114523. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4018/978-1-59904-808-6.ch066 · DOI
- Matthew L Jensen Yu-Hao Lee Cameron W Piercy Norah E Dunbar Javier Elizondo Elena Bessarabova Nathan W Twyman Judee K Burgoon Joseph S Valacich Bradley Adame Claude Miller and Scott Wilson. 2016. Exploring Failure and Engagement in a Complex Digital Training Game: A Multi-method Examination. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 8 1 (2016) 1–20. · DOI
- Tumaini Kabudi Ilias Pappas and Dag Håkon Olsen. 2021. AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2 (2021) 100017. 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3613905.3648107 · DOI
- Laurence Asep Hermawan Innocentius Bernarto and Ferdi Antonio. 2023. Video Game Engagement: A Passkey to the Intentions of Continue Playing Purchasing Virtual Items and Player Recruitment (3Ps). International Journal of Computer Games Technology 2023 (April 2023) e2648097. 10.1155/2023/2648097 · DOI
- 10.1145/3450337.3483453 · DOI
- Richard E. Mayer and Roxana Moreno. 2003. Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist 38 1 (Jan. 2003) 43–52. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6 · DOI · Paper page
- Jonas Molin and Charlotte Wiberg. 2016. Game Approachability: Remodelling testing of computer Games with the GAID model. International Research Journal of Computer Science 3 (2016) 18–28.
- Fred Paas Alexander Renkl and John Sweller. 2003. Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educational Psychologist 38 1 (Jan. 2003) 1–4. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5555/772072.772128 · doi:10.5555/772072.772128
- 10.1145/3041021.3054176 · DOI
- Mario Passalacqua Raphaël Morin Sylvain Sénécal Lennart E. Nacke and Pierre-Majorique Léger. 2020. Demystifying the First-Time Experience of Mobile Games: The Presence of a Tutorial Has a Positive Impact on Non-Expert Players’ Flow and Continuous-Use Intentions. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 4 3 (July 2020) 41. 10.3390/mti4030041 · DOI
- 10.1145/3116595.3125499 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3491102.3517685 · DOI
- 10.1109/CIG.2013.6633663 · DOI
- Amy Shannon, P O Box, Acey Boyce, Chitra Gadwal, and Dr Tiffany Barnes. 2013. Effective Practices in Game Tutorial Systems. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. Society for the Advancement of the Science of Digital Games, Chania, Crete, Greece, 338–345. http://www.fdg2013.org/program/papers/paper44_shannon_etal.pdf
- Chin Hiong Tan Kay Chen Tan and Arthur Tay. 2011. Dynamic Game Difficulty Scaling Using Adaptive Behavior-Based AI. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 3 4 (Dec. 2011) 289–301. 10.1109/TCIAIG.2011.2158434 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-46100-7_24 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-42716-4_1 · DOI
- Xinghua Wang Qian Liu Hui Pang Seng Chee Tan Jun Lei Matthew P. Wallace and Linlin Li. 2023. What matters in AI-supported learning: A study of human-AI interactions in language learning using cluster analysis and epistemic network analysis. Computers & Education 194 (2023) 104703. 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104703 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1201/b17044-3 · doi:10.1201/b17044-3
- 10.1145/2212908.2212954 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-319-63519-4_4 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63519-4_4
- 10.1007/978-3-319-63519-4_1 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63519-4_1
- 10.1007/978-3-319-63519-4_5 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63519-4_5
- 10.1007/978-3-319-63519-4_3 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63519-4_3
- 10.1145/3450337.3483456 · DOI
- Alexander Zook and Mark O. Riedl. 2015. Temporal Game Challenge Tailoring. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 7 4 (Dec. 2015) 336–346. 10.1109/TCIAIG.2014.2342934 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Choong, L., Cmentowski, S., Kukshinov, E., Tu, J., & Nacke, L. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2025-04-25
- Pages
- 1-17
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 10
- Funders
- NSERC Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2023-03705)
- CFI John R. Evans Leaders Fund (41844)
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (435-2022-0476)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Support Autonomy: Exploring Player Perspectives on AI-Supported Onboarding in Video Games. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3706598.3713576
- The paper
- Choong, L., Cmentowski, S., Kukshinov, E., Tu, J., & Nacke, L. E. (2025). Support Autonomy: Exploring Player Perspectives on AI-Supported Onboarding in Video Games. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713576
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.