Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Gains to Strains: Modeling Developer Burnout with GenAI Adoption

Feng, Zixuan, Afroz, Sadia, Sarma, Anita·2026·Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 48th International Conference on Software Engineering
DOI 10.1145/3786581.3786934
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3786581.3786934

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Saleh Afroogh Ali Akbari Emmie Malone Mohammadali Kargar and Hananeh Alambeigi. 2024. Trust in AI: progress challenges and future directions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11 1 (2024) 1–30. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Amitabh Anand Audrey Dalmasso Saeedeh Rezaee Vessal Nakul Parameswar James Rajasekar and Manoranjan Dhal. 2023. The effect of job security insecurity and burnout on employee organizational commitment. Journal of Business Research 162 (2023) 113843. · DOI
  3. Arnold B Bakker and Evangelia Demerouti. 2007. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology 22 3 (2007) 309–328. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Arnold B Bakker Evangelia Demerouti and Willem Verbeke. 2004. Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Hum. Resour. Manag. 43 1 (2004) 83–104. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cristian Balducci Wilmar B Schaufeli and Franco Fraccaroli. 2011. The job demands–resources model and counterproductive work behaviour: The role of job-related affect. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 20 4 (2011) 467–496. · DOI
  6. Albert Bandura. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50 2 (1991) 248–287. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Maurice S Bartlett. 1950. Tests of significance in factor analysis. British journal of psychology 3 (1950) 77–85.
  8. Jan-Michael Becker Kristina Klein and Martin Wetzels. 2012. Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long range planning 45 5-6 (2012) 359–394. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Yoav Benjamini and Yosef Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57 1 (1995) 289–300. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Susan A Brown Anne P Massey Mitzi M Montoya-Weiss and James R Burkman. 2002. Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European journal of information systems 11 4 (2002) 283–295. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Jie Cao Jing Liu and Jose Weng Chou Wong. 2024. JD-R model on job insecurity and the moderating effect of COVID-19 perceived susceptibility. Current Psychology 43 18 (2024) 16890–16904. · DOI
  12. Chimdi Chikezie Pannapat Chanpaisaeng Puja Agarwal et al. 2025. Measuring SES-related traits relating to technology usage: Two validated surveys. Empir. Softw. Eng. 30 6 (2025) 1–38. · DOI
  13. Rudrajit Choudhuri, Dylan Liu, Igor Steinmacher, Marco Gerosa, and Anita Sarma. 2024. How far are we? the triumphs and trials of generative ai in learning software engineering. In ICSE. IEEE, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–13.
  14. Thomas Clausen Ida EH Madsen Karl Bang Christensen et al. 2019. The Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ). Scandinavian journal of work environment & health 45 4 (2019) 356–369. · DOI
  15. Jacob Cohen. 2013. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge, New York, NY, USA. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kevin Crowston Francesco Bolici and Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale. 2025. Deskilling and upskilling with generative AI systems. Proceedings of the iConference 30 (2025) 1009–1023. · DOI
  17. Fred D Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly 13 3 (1989) 319–340. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Evangelia Demerouti Arnold B Bakker Friedhelm Nachreiner and Wilmar B Schaufeli. 2001. The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied psychology 86 3 (2001) 499. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Daniel Dorta-Afonso Laura Romero-Domínguez and Claudia Benítez-Núñez. 2023. It’s worth it! High performance work systems for employee job satisfaction: The mediational role of burnout. International Journal of Hospitality Management 108 (2023) 103364. · DOI
  20. M Esposito X Li S Moreschini N Ahmad T Cerny K Vaidhyanathan V Lenarduzzi and D Taibi. 2025. Generative ai for software architecture. applications challenges and future directions. · DOI
  21. Leandre R Fabrigar Duane T Wegener Robert C MacCallum and Erin J Strahan. 1999. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological methods 4 3 (1999) 272. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Franz Faul Edgar Erdfelder Axel Buchner and Albert-Georg Lang. 2009. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods 41 4 (2009) 1149–1160. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Zixuan Feng, Amreeta Chatterjee, Anita Sarma, and Iftekhar Ahmed. 2022. A case study of implicit mentoring, its prevalence, and impact in Apache. In FSE. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 797–809.
  24. Zixuan Feng, Igor Steinmacher, Marco Gerosa, Tyler Menezes, Alexander Serebrenik, Reed Milewicz, and Anita Sarma. 2025. The multifaceted nature of mentoring in oss: strategies, qualities, and ideal outcomes. In CHASE. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 203–214.
  25. Zixuan Feng Thomas Zimmermann Lorenzo Pisani Christopher Gooley Jeremiah Wander and Anita Sarma. 2025. When Domains Collide: An Activity Theory Exploration of Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Jane Forman and Laura Damschroder. 2007. Qualitative Content Analysis. In Empirical Methods for Bioethics: A Primer. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, England, 39–62. · DOI · Paper page
  27. John Fox. 2015. Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  28. D Randy Garrison Martha Cleveland-Innes Marguerite Koole and James Kappelman. 2006. Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability. The internet and higher education 9 1 (2006) 1–8. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Google / DORA / Google Cloud. 2025. State of AI-Assisted Software Development. Technical Report. Google. https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/2025_state_of_ai_assisted_software_development.pdf Accessed: 2025-09-28.
  30. Jennifer C Greene. 2007. Mixed methods in social inquiry. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, USA.
  31. J Richard Hackman and Greg R Oldham. 1976. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance 16 2 (1976) 250–279. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Joe F Hair Christian M Ringle and Marko Sarstedt. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice 19 2 (2011) 139–152. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Joseph F Hair Jeffrey J Risher Marko Sarstedt and Christian M Ringle. 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review 31 1 (2019) 2–24. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Joe F Hair Jr Matt C Howard and Christian Nitzl. 2020. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of business research 109 (2020) 101–110. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Joseph F Hair Jr, G Tomas M Hult, Christian M Ringle, Marko Sarstedt, Nicholas P Danks, and Soumya Ray. 2021. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Jörg Henseler Christian M Ringle and Marko Sarstedt. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science 43 1 (2015) 115–135. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Stevan E Hobfoll. 1989. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American psychologist 44 3 (1989) 513. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Brian Houck Travis Lowdermilk Cody Beyer Steven Clarke and Ben Hanrahan. 2025. The SPACE of AI: Real-World Lessons on AI’s Impact on Developers. · DOI
  39. Matt C Howard. 2016. A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve? International journal of human-computer interaction 32 1 (2016) 51–62. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Minh-Tay Huynh and Thomas Aichner. 2025. In generative artificial intelligence we trust: unpacking determinants and outcomes for cognitive trust. AI & SOCIETY 40 (2025) 5849–5869. · DOI
  41. JASP Team. 2023. JASP (Version 0.17.2) [Computer software]. JASP Team. https://jasp-stats.org/
  42. Brittany Johnson, Christian Bird, Denae Ford, Nicole Forsgren, and Thomas Zimmermann. 2023. Make your tools sparkle with trust: The PICSE framework for trust in software tools. In ICSE-SEIP. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 409–419.
  43. David B Kaber and Mica R Endsley. 1997. Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety. Process safety progress 16 3 (1997) 126–131. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Sungmin Kang Gabin An and Shin Yoo. 2024. A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of LLM-based explainable fault localization. Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering 1 FSE (2024) 1424–1446. · DOI · Paper page
  45. Asaduzzaman Khan Geoffrey McLeod Tarissa Hidajat and Elizabeth J Edwards. 2023. Excessive smartphone use is associated with depression anxiety stress and sleep quality of Australian adults. Journal of medical systems 47 1 (2023) 109. · DOI
  46. Ned Kock. 2014. Advanced mediating effects tests multi-group analyses and measurement model assessments in PLS-based SEM. IJeC) 10 1 (2014) 1–13. · DOI · Paper page
  47. J Richard Landis and Gary G Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics 33 1 (1977) 159–174. · DOI · Paper page
  48. R Lazarus and S Folkman. 1985. Stress and coping. New York 18 31 (1985) 34–42. · DOI
  49. Christina Maslach Wilmar B Schaufeli and Michael P Leiter. 2001. Job burnout. Annual review of psychology 52 2001 (2001) 397–422. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Hannah Mayer, Lareina Yee, Michael Chui, and Roger Roberts. 2025. Superagency in the Workplace: Empowering People to Unlock AI’s Full Potential. Technical Report. McKinsey & Company. https://beav.es/wUh Report.
  51. Monica Molino Claudio G Cortese and Chiara Ghislieri. 2020. The promotion of technology acceptance and work engagement in industry 4.0: From personal resources to information and training. International journal of environmental research and public health 17 7 (2020) 2438. · DOI
  52. Frederick P Morgeson and Stephen E Humphrey. 2006. The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of applied psychology 91 6 (2006) 1321. · DOI · Paper page
  53. Janice M. Morse. 2016. Mixed Method Design: Principles and Procedures. Routledge, New York, NY, USA. · DOI
  54. Anh Nguyen-Duc Beatriz Cabrero-Daniel Adam Przybylek et al. 2025. Generative AI for software engineering: A research agenda. · DOI · Paper page
  55. Oliver Wyman Forum. 2024. How Generative AI Is Transforming Business and Society. Technical Report. Oliver Wyman Forum, a think tank of Marsh & McLennan Companies. https://www.oliverwymanforum.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/ow-forum/gcs/2023/AI-Report-2024-Davos.pdf Accessed: 2025-09-17.
  56. Peterson K Ozili. 2023. The acceptable R-square in empirical modelling for social science research. In Social research methodology and publishing results: A guide to non-native English speakers. IGI global, Hershey, PA, USA, 134–143. · DOI · Paper page
  57. Elise Paradis, Kate Grey, Quinn Madison, et al. 2025. How much does AI impact development speed? An enterprise RCT. In ICSE-SEIP. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 618–629.
  58. Ketai Qiu Niccolò Puccinelli Matteo Ciniselli and Luca Di Grazia. 2025. From today’s code to tomorrow’s symphony: The AI transformation of developer’s routine by 2030. TOSEM 34 5 (2025) 1–17. · DOI
  59. Johan E Ravn Nils Brede Moe Viktoria Stray and Eva Amdahl Seim. 2022. Team autonomy and digital transformation: Disruptions and adjustments in a well-established organizational principle. AI & SOCIETY 37 2 (2022) 701–710. · DOI
  60. Partha Pratim Ray. 2025. A Review on Vibe Coding: Fundamentals State-of-the-art Challenges and Future Directions.
  61. Christian Ringle Dirceu Da Silva and Diógenes Bido. 2015. Structural equation modeling with SmartPLS. Braz. J. Marketing 13 2 (2015) 56–73. · DOI · Paper page
  62. Andra Cătălina Roșca Alexandru Mateizer Cristina-Ioana Dan and Evangelia Demerouti. 2021. Job demands and exhaustion in firefighters: The moderating role of work meaning. A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 18 (2021) 9819. · DOI
  63. Daniel Russo. 2024. Navigating the complexity of generative ai adoption in software engineering. TOSEM 33 5 (2024) 1–50. · DOI · Paper page
  64. Daniel Russo and Klaas-Jan Stol. 2021. PLS-SEM for software engineering research: An introduction and survey. CSUR 54 4 (2021) 1–38. · DOI · Paper page
  65. Marko Sarstedt Joseph F. Hair Jun-Hwa Cheah et al. 2019. How to specify estimate and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australas. Mark. J. 27 3 (2019) 197–211. · DOI · Paper page
  66. Wilmar B Schaufeli and Arnold B Bakker. 2004. Job demands job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav. 25 3 (2004) 293–315. · DOI · Paper page
  67. Alexander Scholze and Achim Hecker. 2023. Digital job demands and resources: Digitization in the context of the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20 16 (2023) 6581. · DOI
  68. Alexander Scholze and Achim Hecker. 2024. The job demands-resources model as a theoretical lens for the bright and dark side of digitization. Computers in Human Behavior 155 (2024) 108177. · DOI · Paper page
  69. Md Istiak Hossain Shihab, Christopher Hundhausen, Ahsun Tariq, Summit Haque, Yunhan Qiao, and Brian Wise Mulanda. 2025. The Effects of GitHub Copilot on Computing Students’ Programming Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Processes in Brownfield Coding Tasks. In ICER. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 407–420.
  70. Klaas-Jan Stol and Brian Fitzgerald. 2018. The ABC of software engineering research. TOSEM 27 3 (2018) 1–51. · DOI · Paper page
  71. Mervyn Stone. 1974. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 36 2 (1974) 111–133. · DOI · Paper page
  72. Gail M Sullivan and Anthony R Artino Jr. 2013. Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 5 4 (2013) 541. · DOI · Paper page
  73. Bianca Trinkenreich, Zixuan Feng, Rudrajit Choudhuri, Marco Gerosa, Anita Sarma, and Igor Steinmacher. 2025. Investigating the Impact of Interpersonal Challenges on Feeling Welcome in OSS. In 2025 IEEE/ACM 47th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE Computer Society, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 593–593.
  74. Bianca Trinkenreich Fabio Santos and Klaas-jan Stol. 2024. Predicting attrition among software professionals: Antecedents and consequences of burnout and engagement. TOSEM 33 8 (2024) 1–45. · DOI · Paper page
  75. Bianca Trinkenreich, Klaas-Jan Stol, Anita Sarma, Daniel M German, Marco A Gerosa, and Igor Steinmacher. 2023. Do i belong? modeling sense of virtual community among linux kernel contributors. In ICSE. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 319–331.
  76. Tien Rahayu Tulili Andrea Capiluppi and Ayushi Rastogi. 2023. Burnout in software engineering: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology 155 (2023) 107116. · DOI
  77. Lars G Tummers and Arnold B Bakker. 2021. Leadership and job demands-resources theory: A systematic review. Frontiers in psychology 12 (2021) 722080. · DOI · Paper page
  78. Viswanath Venkatesh James YL Thong and Xin Xu. 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly 36 1 (2012) 157–178. · DOI · Paper page
  79. Roger L Worthington and Tiffany A Whittaker. 2006. Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The counseling psychologist 34 6 (2006) 806–838. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Feng, Z., Afroz, S., & Sarma, A.
Affiliations
Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 48th International Conference on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM
Published
2026-04-12
Pages
125-136
DOI
10.1145/3786581.3786934
Cited by
6
References
2
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode (vor)
Funders
National Science Foundation (2303043)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.