Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 836

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward an Ecology of Materials

Ingold, Tim·2012·Annual Review of Anthropology

Abstract

Both material culture studies and ecological anthropology are concerned with the material conditions of social and cultural life. Yet despite advances in each of these fields that have eroded traditional divisions between humanistic and science-based approaches, their respective practitioners continue to talk past one another in largely incommensurate theoretical languages. This review of recent trends in the study of material culture finds the reasons for this in (a) a conception of the material world and the nonhuman that leaves no space for living organisms, (b) an emphasis on materiality that prioritizes finished artifacts over the properties of materials, and (c) a conflation of things with objects that stops up the flows of energy and circulations of materials on which life depends. To overcome these limitations, the review proposes an ecology of materials that focuses on their enrollment in form-making processes. It concludes with some observations on materials, mind, and time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145920

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. Alberti B. 2007. Destabilizing meaning in anthropomorphic forms from Northwest Argentina. See Jorge & Thomas 2007, pp. 209–29
  2. 10.1086/345321 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Basso K, 1992, Western Apache Language and Culture
  4. Bateson G, 1973, Steps to an Ecology of Mind
  5. 10.1215/9780822391623 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/278380 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Binford LR, 1983, In Pursuit of the Past: Decoding the Archaeological Record
  8. Boivin N. 2004. Mind over matter? Collapsing the mind-matter dichotomy in material culture studies. See DeMarrais et al. 2004, pp. 63–71
  9. Boivin N, 2008, Material Cultures, Material Minds: The Impact of Things on Human Thought, Society and Evolution
  10. Boyd R, 2005, The Origin and Evolution of Cultures, 10.1093/oso/9780195165241.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1086/449030 · DOI
  12. Bunn S. 2011. Materials in making. See Ingold 2011c, pp. 21–32
  13. Clark A, 2001, Mindware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science
  14. Clark A, 2010, Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension
  15. Conneller C, 2011, An Archaeology of Materials: Substantial Transformations in Early Prehistoric Europe
  16. Croll E, 1992, Bush Base: Forest Farm. Culture, Environment and Development.
  17. DeMarrais E, 2004, Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World
  18. 10.4324/9780203451069 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1126/science.176.4031.123 · DOI
  20. Elkins J, 2000, What Painting Is: How to Think About Painting, Using the Language of Alchemy
  21. Ellen R, 1996, Redefining Nature: Ecology, Culture and Domestication
  22. 10.1111/1467-9655.00023 · DOI
  23. Flusser V, 1999, The Shape of Things: A Philosophy of Design
  24. Friedman T, 1996, Wood, 6
  25. Gosden C. 2004. Making and display: our aesthetic appreciation of things and objects. See Renfrew et al. 2004, pp. 35–45
  26. 10.1007/s10816-005-6928-x · DOI · Paper page
  27. Gosden C. 2010. The death of the mind. See Malafouris & Renfrew 2010, pp. 39–46
  28. Graves-Brown PM, 2000a. Introduction. See Graves-Brown 2000b, pp. 1–9
  29. Graves-Brown PM, 2000, Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture
  30. Harman G, 2005, Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, 268
  31. 10.1093/cje/bep021 · DOI
  32. Henare A, 2007, Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically, 10.4324/9780203088791 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Hicks D. 2010. The material-cultural turn: event and effect. See Hicks & Beaudry 2010, pp. 25–98
  34. Hicks D, 2010, The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies
  35. Hodder I, 1982, Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture
  36. 10.1017/CBO9780511558252 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1086/201036 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.2307/2804561 · DOI
  39. Ingold T. 1992. Culture and the perception of the environment. See Croll & Parkin 1992, pp. 39–56
  40. Ingold T, 1994, Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology: Humanity, Culture and Social Life, 14
  41. Ingold T. 2000a. Making culture and weaving the world. See Graves-Brown 2000b, pp. 50–71
  42. 10.4324/9780203466025 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.4324/9780203961155 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.4324/9780203818336 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Ingold T. 2011b. Introduction. See Ingold 2011c, pp. 1–20
  46. Ingold T, 2011, Redrawing Anthropology: Materials, Movements, Lines
  47. Jones A, 2002, Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice
  48. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00161.x · DOI
  49. 10.1017/CBO9780511619229 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Jones AM, Boivin N. 2010. The malice of inanimate objects: material agency. See Hicks & Beaudry 2010, pp. 333–51
  51. Jorge VO, Thomas J, eds. 2007. Overcoming the Modern Invention of Material Culture . Porto: ADECAP. Sp. Iss. J. Iber. Archaeol. , Vols. 9/10 · DOI
  52. 10.9783/9780812202496 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1007/978-0-387-74711-8_8 · DOI
  54. Knappett C. 2011. Networks of objects, meshworks of things. See Ingold 2011c, pp. 45–63
  55. Latour B, 2004, Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, 10.4159/9780674039964 · DOI
  56. Latour B, 2005, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Leroi-Gourhan A. 1993. Gesture and Speech , transl. A Bostock Berger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  58. Malafouris L. 2004. The cognitive basis of material engagement: where brain, body and culture conflate. See DeMarrais et al. 2004, pp. 53–62
  59. Malafouris L, 2010, The Cognitive Life of Things: Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind
  60. Marx K, 1963, Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte
  61. Massumi B, 2009, Parrhesia, 7, 36
  62. Merleau-Ponty M, 1968, The Visible and the Invisible
  63. Miller D, 1987, Material Culture and Mass Consumption
  64. Miller D, 1995, Acknowledging Consumption
  65. Myers FR, 1986, Pintupi Country, Pintupi Self: Sentiment, Place and Politics Among Western Desert Aborigines
  66. 10.1177/1359183509346184 · DOI
  67. Nelson RK, 1983, Make Prayers to the Raven: A Koyukon View of the Northern Forest
  68. 10.1080/00293650310000650 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1080/00438240701679643 · DOI
  70. Olsen B, 2010, In Defense of Things
  71. Pollard J. 2004. The art of decay and the transformation of substance. See Renfrew et al. 2004, pp. 47–62
  72. Prown JD, 1998, Learning From Things: Method and Theory of Material Culture Studies, 19
  73. Pye D, 1968, The Nature and Art of Workmanship
  74. Rappaport RA, 1968, Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People.
  75. Renfrew C, 2004, Substance, Memory, Display
  76. 10.1111/j.1755-618X.1982.tb00875.x · DOI
  77. Schiffer B, 1999, The Material Life of Human Beings: Artifacts, Behaviour and Communication
  78. 10.3998/mpub.14807 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.3998/mpub.9736 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Sheets-Johnstone M, 1998, The Primacy of Movement
  81. Sheets-Johnstone M. 2011. The imaginative consciousness of movement: linear quality, kinaesthesia, language and life. See Ingold 2011c, pp. 115–28
  82. Simondon G, 1964, L'Individu et sa Génèse Physico-Biologique.
  83. Simondon G, 1989, L'Individuation Psychique et Collective
  84. Simondon G, 2005, L'Individuation à la Lumière des Notions de Forme et d'Information
  85. Smith EA, 1992, Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior
  86. 10.1177/053901887026004004 · DOI
  87. Thomas J. 2007. The trouble with material culture. See Jorge & Thomas 2007, pp. 11–23 · DOI
  88. Tilley C, 2004, The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape Archaeology
  89. 10.1017/S1380203807002139 · DOI
  90. 10.1086/596123 · DOI
  91. Vayda AP, 1969, Environment and Cultural Behavior: Ecological Studies in Cultural Anthropology
  92. 10.1080/00438240701679619 · DOI
  93. 10.1080/00293650701698423 · DOI
  94. 10.1080/00438240701679411 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.2307/2801707 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ingold, T.
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
2012-10-21
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
427-442
ISSN
  • 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4290
OpenAlex
W2121690840
Cited by
836
References
5
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.