Roles for Actin Assembly in Endocytosis

Mooren, Olivia L.; Galletta, Brian J.; Cooper, John A.

doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060910-094416

Cited by 394

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Roles for Actin Assembly in Endocytosis

Mooren, Olivia L., Galletta, Brian J., Cooper, John A.·2012·Annual Review of Biochemistry

DOI 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060910-094416

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Endocytosis includes a number of processes by which cells internalize segments of their plasma membrane, enclosing a wide variety of material from outside the cell. Endocytosis can contribute to uptake of nutrients, regulation of signaling molecules, control of osmotic pressure, and function of synapses. The actin cytoskeleton plays an essential role in several of these processes. Actin assembly can create protrusions that encompass extracellular materials. Actin can also support the processes of invagination of a membrane segment into the cytoplasm, elongation of the invagination, scission of the new vesicle from the plasma membrane, and movement of the vesicle away from the membrane. We briefly discuss various types of endocytosis, including phagocytosis, macropinocytosis, and clathrin-independent endocytosis. We focus mainly on new findings on the relative importance of actin in clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) in yeast versus mammalian cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060910-094416

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

A High Precision Survey of the Molecular Dynamics of Mammalian Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis
Taylor, M. J., Perrais, D., & Merrifield, C. J. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000604 · Cited by 754
A Modular Design for the Clathrin- and Actin-Mediated Endocytosis Machinery
Kaksonen, M., Toret, C. P., & Drubin, D. G. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.024 · Cited by 726 · cited 6×
“The endocytic proteins Sla1 and Bbc1, also recruited early in the endocytic process, cooperate to inhibit Arp2/3 activation by Las17 (20, 72, 73).”
BackgroundInfluential
Coupling between Clathrin-Coated-Pit Invagination, Cortactin Recruitment, and Membrane Scission Observed in Live Cells
Merrifield, C. J., Perrais, D., & Zenisek, D. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.015 · Cited by 476 · cited 2×
“The use of various actin toxins has demonstrated that actin may participate in multiple stages of endocytosis, including invagination, elongation of the neck of the endocytic vesicle, fission, and movement away from the plasma membrane (23, 24).”
Background
Endocytic Internalization in Budding Yeast Requires Coordinated Actin Nucleation and Myosin Motor Activity
Sun, Y., Martin, A. C., & Drubin, D. G. (2006) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.008 · Cited by 255
The Mechanochemistry of Endocytosis
Liu, J., Sun, Y., Drubin, D. G., & Oster, G. F. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000204 · Cited by 222

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 157

10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.081307.110540 · DOI · Paper page
10.1038/nrm3151 · DOI · Paper page
10.1016/j.ceb.2010.04.001 · DOI
10.1007/s00018-008-7578-4 · DOI
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3397 · DOI
10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00878.x · DOI
10.1016/j.ceb.2010.10.006 · DOI
10.1038/icb.2011.20 · DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.019 · DOI
10.1126/science.1175862 · DOI
10.1016/j.ceb.2010.10.007 · DOI
10.1016/j.tcb.2010.11.001 · DOI
10.1038/nrm2816 · DOI
10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.010 · DOI
10.2217/fmb.10.77 · DOI
10.1038/nrmicro2574 · DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02065.x · DOI
10.1016/j.copbio.2010.06.006 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.137.2.399 · DOI
10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00883-3 · DOI · Paper page
10.1091/mbc.E05-10-0925 · DOI
10.1038/ncb1918 · DOI
10.1091/mbc.E04-09-0774 · DOI
10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.010208.x · DOI
10.1371/journal.pbio.1000191 · DOI
10.1016/j.devcel.2009.11.005 · DOI
10.1038/ncb2094 · DOI
10.1016/j.devcel.2005.11.005 · DOI
10.1091/mbc.e09-12-1044 · DOI
10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.003 · DOI
10.1038/ncb2307 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.120.3.695 · DOI
10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77168-7 · DOI
10.1371/journal.ppat.1000394 · DOI
10.1371/journal.ppat.1001127 · DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.048 · DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.052 · DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.045 · DOI
10.1105/tpc.111.083030 · DOI
10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.30903.x · DOI
10.1104/pp.007526 · DOI
10.1093/jxb/erh042 · DOI
10.1073/pnas.0711414105 · DOI
10.1007/s00299-007-0437-1 · DOI
10.1002/cbic.201000402 · DOI
10.1104/pp.104.040683 · DOI
10.1016/S1937-6448(08)00633-3 · DOI
10.4161/cam.2.2.6190 · DOI
10.1242/jcs.066852 · DOI
10.1091/mbc.E10-04-0372 · DOI
10.1091/mbc.E11-07-0628 · DOI
10.1038/sj.emboj.7601576 · DOI
10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00492.x · DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.058 · DOI
10.1016/j.ceb.2010.05.009 · DOI
10.1016/j.ceb.2009.11.009 · DOI · Paper page
10.1007/s00018-009-0001-y · DOI
10.1016/j.febslet.2008.04.011 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.200708060 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.200404159 · DOI
10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00223-5 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.200408177 · DOI
10.1038/nsmb870 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M502024200 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.136.3.649 · DOI
10.1371/journal.pbio.0060001 · DOI
10.1038/emboj.2009.248 · DOI
10.1091/mbc.E09-05-0429 · DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.062 · DOI
10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00383-X · DOI
10.1128/MCB.22.22.7889-7906.2002 · DOI
10.1038/emboj.2010.159 · DOI
10.1242/jcs.067850 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M508933200 · DOI
10.1091/mbc.E06-09-0788 · DOI
10.1002/iub.195 · DOI
10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.02.012 · DOI
10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.08.013 · DOI
10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05936.x · DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.047 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.200909176 · DOI
10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00131-3 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.200501086 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.200603149 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.200801027 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.200703092 · DOI
10.1242/jcs.065698 · DOI
10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.029 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.200206113 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M111.219964 · DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.020 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M111.239004 · DOI
10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05947.x · DOI
10.1038/354404a0 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M710332200 · DOI
10.1091/mbc.e10-02-0157 · DOI
10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.026 · DOI
10.1091/mbc.E04-11-1016 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.200508091 · DOI
10.1371/journal.pbio.1000057 · DOI
10.1038/ncb2175 · DOI
10.1152/physrev.00036.2009 · DOI
10.4161/cc.9.20.13587 · DOI
10.1093/jb/mvq049 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M510226200 · DOI
10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.010 · DOI
10.1126/science.1188462 · DOI · Paper page
10.1007/s00709-005-0108-4 · DOI
10.1038/emboj.2008.216 · DOI
10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.027 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M404899200 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M910430199 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M307334200 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M308104200 · DOI
10.1126/science.1071362 · DOI
10.1016/j.devcel.2010.12.008 · DOI
10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.12.002 · DOI
10.1038/35044540 · DOI
Colwill K, 1999, Genetics, 152, 881, 10.1093/genetics/152.3.881 · DOI
10.1016/j.devcel.2007.04.014 · DOI
10.1038/ncb1688 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M710185200 · DOI
10.1038/35047107 · DOI
10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00506-1 · DOI
10.1006/bbrc.2000.2671 · DOI
10.1038/sj.onc.1208412 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M212113200 · DOI
10.1042/BJ20021962 · DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0020845 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.200910136 · DOI
10.1042/BJ20101684 · DOI
10.1042/BST0371022 · DOI
10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.09.001 · DOI
10.1111/j.1600-0854.2004.00199.x · DOI
10.1016/j.febslet.2007.01.021 · DOI
10.1038/emboj.2010.249 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M109.024398 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.272.33.20332 · DOI
10.1242/jcs.01239 · DOI
10.1242/jcs.070508 · DOI
10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.02.002 · DOI
10.1083/jcb.201009037 · DOI
10.1091/mbc.E10-03-0181 · DOI
10.1073/pnas.94.16.8569 · DOI
10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80828-4 · DOI
10.1073/pnas.93.1.331 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.272.26.16700 · DOI · Paper page
10.1073/pnas.0609795104 · DOI
10.1073/pnas.0601045103 · DOI
10.1091/mbc.E10-06-0494 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M110.199794 · DOI
10.1016/j.tcb.2010.04.004 · DOI
10.1074/jbc.M110.127613 · DOI
Gotoh N, 2010, Cytoskeleton, 67, 178, 10.1002/cm.20435 · DOI
10.1038/nrm1940 · DOI · Paper page
10.1016/j.tcb.2004.05.008 · DOI
10.1016/j.febslet.2009.10.019 · DOI

Sorted by citations

The actin cytoskeleton and actin-based motility
Svitkina, T. (2018) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a018267 · Cited by 761
Ultrafast endocytosis at mouse hippocampal synapses
Watanabe, S., Rost, B. R., Camacho-Pérez, M., Davis, M. W., Söhl-Kielczynski, B., Rosenmund, C., & Jorgensen, E. M. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12809 · Cited by 607
Cholesterol and matrisome pathways dysregulated in astrocytes and microglia
TCW, J., Qian, L., Pipalia, N. H., Chao, M. J., Liang, S. A., Shi, Y., Jain, B. R., Bertelsen, S. E., Kapoor, M., Marcora, E., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.017 · Cited by 411
An Actin Network Dispatches Ciliary GPCRs into Extracellular Vesicles to Modulate Signaling
Nager, A. R., Goldstein, J. S., Herranz-Pérez, V., Portran, D., Ye, F., Garcia-Verdugo, J. M., & Nachury, M. V. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.036 · Cited by 366
Dynamin 2 regulates biphasic insulin secretion and plasma glucose homeostasis
Fan, F., Ji, C., Wu, Y., Ferguson, S. M., Tamarina, N., Philipson, L. H., & Lou, X. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci80652 · Cited by 43

See all 394

Authors: Mooren, O. L., Galletta, B. J., & Cooper, J. A.
Affiliations: Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110;
Venue: Annual Review of Biochemistry
Publisher: Annual Reviews
Published: 2012-07-07
Volume: 81
Issue: 1
Pages: 661-686
ISSN: 0066-4154
1545-4509
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060910-094416
Cited by: 394
References: 5
Language: en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Roles for Actin Assembly in Endocytosis

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Record

About these checks