The DOI matches its Crossref record; 173 of the 173 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks by the Nonhomologous End Joining Pathway
Open accessAbstract
DNA double-strand breaks pose a serious threat to genome stability. In vertebrates, these breaks are predominantly repaired by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), which pairs DNA ends in a multiprotein synaptic complex to promote their direct ligation. NHEJ is a highly versatile pathway that uses an array of processing enzymes to modify damaged DNA ends and enable their ligation. The mechanisms of end synapsis and end processing have important implications for genome stability. Rapid and stable synapsis is necessary to limit chromosome translocations that result from the mispairing of DNA ends. Furthermore, end processing must be tightly regulated to minimize mutations at the break site. Here, we review our current mechanistic understanding of vertebrate NHEJ, with a particular focus on end synapsis and processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“NHEJ operates by recognizing DSBs, processing the DNA ends, and ligating them, infrequently resulting in insertions or deletions (indels) that can disrupt gene function (Stinson & Loparo, 2021; Takata et al., 1998).”
From CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Nucleofection for Genome Editing in Primary Human Keratinocytes: Knockouts, Deletions, and Homology‐Directed Repair Mutagenesis (2024) · cites this paper as Stinson & Loparo, 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway
Lieber, M. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.093131 · Cited by 2,882
DNA Topoisomerases: Structure, Function, and Mechanism
Champoux, J. J. (2001) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.369 · Cited by 2,804
Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development
Stephens, P. J., Greenman, C. D., Fu, B., Yang, F., Bignell, G. R., Mudie, L. J., Pleasance, E. D., Lau, K. W., Beare, D., Stebbings, L. A., et al. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.055 · Cited by 2,414
Double-Strand Break End Resection and Repair Pathway Choice
Symington, L. S., & Gautier, J. (2011) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132435 · Cited by 1,556
DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells
Scully, R., Panday, A., Elango, R., & Willis, N. A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0152-0 · Cited by 1,542
Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break
Ceccaldi, R., Rondinelli, B., & D’Andrea, A. D. (2016) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.009 · Cited by 1,499
Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage
Falck, J., Coates, J., & Jackson, S. P. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03442 · Cited by 1,304
Takata, M., Sasaki, M. S., Sonoda, E., Morrison, C., Hashimoto, M., Utsumi, H., Yamaguchi‐Iwai, Y., Shinohara, A., & Takeda, S. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.18.5497 · Cited by 1,229
Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair
Walker, J. R., Corpina, R. A., & Goldberg, J. D. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35088000 · Cited by 1,216
Chu, V. T., Weber, T., Wefers, B., Wurst, W., Sander, S., Rajewsky, K., & Kühn, R. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3198 · Cited by 1,210
Ma, Y., Pannicke, U., Schwarz, K., & Lieber, M. R. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00671-2 · Cited by 1,166
Maruyama, T., Dougan, S. K., Truttmann, M. C., Bilate, A. M., Ingram, J. R., & Ploegh, H. L. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3190 · Cited by 1,137
Single-strand break repair and genetic disease
Caldecott, K. W. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2380 · Cited by 1,097
Repair of Strand Breaks by Homologous RecombinationPreprint
Jasin, M., & Rothstein, R. J. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012740 · Cited by 929
Riballo, E., Kühne, M., Rief, N., Doherty, A., Smith, G. C. M., Recio, M.-J., Reis, C., Dahm, K., Fricke, A., Krempler, A., et al. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.10.029 · Cited by 837
Shelterin-Mediated Telomere Protection
de Lange, T. (2018) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-032918-021921 · Cited by 816
XLF Interacts with the XRCC4-DNA Ligase IV Complex to Promote DNA Nonhomologous End-Joining
Ahnesorg, P., Smith, P., & Jackson, S. P. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.031 · Cited by 794
Buck, D., Malivert, L., de Chasseval, R., Barraud, A., Fondanèche, M.-C., Sanal, O., Plebani, A., Stéphan, J.-L., Hufnagel, M., le Deist, F., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.030 · Cited by 722
Endogenous DNA double-strand breaks: production, fidelity of repair, and induction of cancer
Vilenchik, M. M., & Knudson, A. G. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2135498100 · Cited by 717
Activity of DNA ligase IV stimulated by complex formation with XRCC4 protein in mammalian cells
Grawunder, U., Wilm, M. S., Wu, X., Kulesza, P., Wilson, T. E., Mann, M., & Lieber, M. R. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/41358 · Cited by 694
A critical role for DNA end-joining proteins in both lymphogenesis and neurogenesis
Gao, Y., Sun, Y., Frank, K. M., Dikkes, P., Fujiwara, Y., Seidl, K. J., Sekiguchi, J. M., Rathbun, G. A., Swat, W., Wang, J., et al. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81714-6 · Cited by 688
Class-switch recombination: interplay of transcription, DNA deamination and DNA repair
Chaudhuri, J., & Alt, F. W. (2004) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1395 · Cited by 657
Microhomology-Mediated End Joining: A Back-up Survival Mechanism or Dedicated Pathway?
Sfeir, A., & Symington, L. S. (2015) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2015.08.006 · Cited by 636
V(D)J Recombination: Mechanisms of Initiation
Schatz, D. G., & Swanson, P. C. (2011) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132552 · Cited by 634
DNA processing is not required for ATM-mediated telomere damage response after TRF2 deletion
Celli, G. B., & de Lange, T. (2005) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1275 · Cited by 623
IgH class switching and translocations use a robust non-classical end-joining pathway
Yan, C. T., Boboilă, C., Souza, E. K., Franco, S., Hickernell, T. R., Murphy, M., Gumaste, S., Geyer, M. B., Zarrin, A. A., Manis, J. P., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06020 · Cited by 598
Late embryonic lethality and impaired V (D)J recombination in mice lacking DNA ligase IV
Frank, K. M., Sekiguchi, J., Seidl, K. J., Swat, W., Rathbun, G. A., Cheng, H.-L., Davidson, L., Kangaloo, L., & Alt, F. W. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/24172 · Cited by 594
Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks
Kruhlak, M. J., Celeste, A., Dellaire, G., Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Müller, W. G., McNally, J. G., Bazett-Jones, D. P., & Nussenzweig, A. (2006) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200510015 · Cited by 518
Regulation of Single-Strand Annealing and its Role in Genome Maintenance
Bhargava, R., Onyango, D. O., & Stark, J. M. (2016) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2016.06.007 · Cited by 512
Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells
Soutoglou, E., Dorn, J. F., Sengupta, K., Jasin, M., Nussenzweig, A., Ried, T., Danuser, G., & Misteli, T. (2007) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1591 · Cited by 509
Lack of N Regions in Antigen Receptor Variable Region Genes of TdT-Deficient Lymphocytes
Komori, T., Okada, A., Stewart, V., & Alt, F. W. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8356451 · Cited by 493
Mechanisms of Programmed DNA Lesions and Genomic Instability in the Immune System
Alt, F. W., Zhang, Y., Meng, F., Guo, C., & Schwer, B. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.007 · Cited by 477
Roth, D. B., & Wilson, J. H. (1986) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.6.12.4295 · Cited by 461
Li, Z., Otevrel, T., Gao, Y., Cheng, H.-L., Seed, B., Stamato, T. D., Taccioli, G. E., & Alt, F. W. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90135-3 · Cited by 458
Preclinical Evaluation of a Potent Novel DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Inhibitor NU7441
Zhao, Y., Thomas, H. D., Batey, M. A., Cowell, I. G., Richardson, C. J., Griffin, R. J., Calvert, H., Newell, D. R., Smith, G. C. M., & Curtin, N. J. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-4275 · Cited by 447
Targeted disruption of the gene encoding DNA ligase IV leads to lethality in embryonic mice
Barnes, D. E., Stamp, G., Rosewell, I. R., Denzel, A., & Lindahl, T. L. (1998) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(98)00021-9 · Cited by 438
Karanam, K., Kafri, R., Loewer, A., & Lahav, G. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.052 · Cited by 435
Is Non-Homologous End-Joining Really an Inherently Error-Prone Process?
Bétermier, M., Bertrand, P., & López, B. S. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086 · Cited by 420
A human 5′-tyrosyl DNA phosphodiesterase that repairs topoisomerase-mediated DNA damage
Cortés‐Ledesma, F., El‐Khamisy, S. F., Zuma, M. C., Osborn, K., & Caldecott, K. W. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08444 · Cited by 418
Autophosphorylation of DNA-PKCS regulates its dynamics at DNA double-strand breaks
Uematsu, N., Weterings, E., Yano, K., Morotomi‐Yano, K., Jakob, B., Taucher-Scholz, G., Mari, P., van Gent, D. C., Chen, B. P. C., & Chen, D. J. (2007) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200608077 · Cited by 414
Yang, S., Burgin, A. B., Huizenga, B. N., Robertson, C. A., Yao, K. C., & Nash, H. A. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.21.11534 · Cited by 413
Ku Recruits the XRCC4-Ligase IV Complex to DNA Ends
McElhinny, S. A. N., McCarville, J., Snowden, C. M., & Ramsden, D. A. (2020) · PubMed Central · doi:10.17615/5hds-gb46 · Cited by 402
The neurodegenerative disease protein aprataxin resolves abortive DNA ligation intermediates
Ahel, I., Rass, U., El‐Khamisy, S. F., Katyal, S., Clements, P. M., McKinnon, P. J., Caldecott, K. W., & West, S. C. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05164 · Cited by 383
A Biochemically Defined System for Mammalian Nonhomologous DNA End Joining
Ma, Y., Lu, H., Tippin, B. L., Goodman, M. F., Shimazaki, N., Koiwai, O., Hsieh, C., Schwarz, K., & Lieber, M. R. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.017 · Cited by 377
End-joining, translocations and cancer
Bunting, S. F., & Nussenzweig, A. (2013) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3537 · Cited by 372
Strumberg, D., Pilon, A. A., Smith, M. W., Hickey, R. J., Malkas, L. H., & Pommier, Y. G. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.11.3977-3987.2000 · Cited by 367
Synapsis of DNA ends by DNA‐dependent protein kinase
DeFazio, L. G., Stansel, R. M., Griffith, J. D., & Chu, G. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf299 · Cited by 365
PAXX, a paralog of XRCC4 and XLF, interacts with Ku to promote DNA double-strand break repair
Ochi, T., Blackford, A. N., Coates, J., Jhujh, S. S., Mehmood, S., Tamura, N., Travers, J., Wu, Q., Draviam, V. M., Robinson, C. V., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1261971 · Cited by 360
Eukaryotic DNA Ligases: Structural and Functional Insights
Ellenberger, T., & Tomkinson, A. E. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.123941 · Cited by 356
Fok, J. H. L., Ramos‐Montoya, A., Vázquez–Chantada, M., Wijnhoven, P. W. G., Follia, V., James, N. H., Farrington, P. M., Karmokar, A., Willis, S. E., Cairns, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12836-9 · Cited by 352
Chromosomal Translocations in Human Cells Are Generated by Canonical Nonhomologous End-Joining
Ghezraoui, H., Piganeau, M., Renouf, B., Renaud, J.-B., Sallmyr, A., Ruis, B., Oh, S., Tomkinson, A. E., Hendrickson, E. A., Giovannangeli, C., et al. (2014) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.002 · Cited by 351
Zhang, Y., He, Q., Hu, Z., Feng, Y., Fan, L., Tang, Z., Yuan, J., Shan, W., Li, C., Hu, Z., et al. (2016) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.3211 · Cited by 340
IgH Chain Class Switch Recombination: Mechanism and Regulation
Stavnezer, J., & Schrader, C. E. (2014) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1401849 · Cited by 339
McElhinny, S. A. N., Havener, J. M., García–Díaz, M., Juárez, R., Bębenek, K., Kee, B. L., Blanco, L., Kunkel, T. A., & Ramsden, D. A. (2005) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.012 · Cited by 327
Ding, Q., Reddy, Y. V. R., Wang, W., Woods, T. L., Douglas, P., Ramsden, D. A., Lees‐Miller, S. P., & Meek, K. (2003) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.23.16.5836-5848.2003 · Cited by 324
Ku complex interacts with and stimulates the Werner proteinPreprint
Cooper, M. P., Machwe, A., Orren, D. K., Brosh, R. M., Ramsden, D. A., & Bohr, V. A. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.8.907 · Cited by 320
Regulation of DNA repair pathway choice in S and G2 phases by the NHEJ inhibitor CYREN
Arnoult, N., Correia, A., Ma, J., Merlo, A., Garcia-Gomez, S., Maric, M., Tognetti, M., Benner, C. W., Boulton, S. J., Saghatelian, A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24023 · Cited by 299
DNA end-joining catalyzed by human cell-free extracts
Baumann, P., & West, S. C. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.24.14066 · Cited by 295
The DNA-dependent Protein Kinase Is Inactivated by Autophosphorylation of the Catalytic Subunit
Chan, D. W., & Lees‐Miller, S. P. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.15.8936 · Cited by 291
Meek, K., Dang, V. D., & Lees‐Miller, S. P. (2008) · Advances in immunology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2776(08)00602-0 · Cited by 289
Jette, N., & Lees‐Miller, S. P. (2014) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.12.003 · Cited by 281
Cui, X., Yu, Y., Gupta, S., Cho, Y., Lees‐Miller, S. P., & Meek, K. (2005) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.25.24.10842-10852.2005 · Cited by 277
Activation of the ATR kinase by the RPA-binding protein ETAA1
Haahr, P., Hoffmann, S., Tollenaere, M. A. X., Ho, T., Toledo, L. I., Mann, M., Bekker‐Jensen, S., Räschle, M., & Mailand, N. (2016) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3422 · Cited by 272
Spagnolo, L., Rivera-Calzada, Á., Pearl, L. H., & Llorca, Ó. (2006) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.013 · Cited by 270
Pharmacological inhibition of DNA-PK stimulates Cas9-mediated genome editing
Robert, F., Barbeau, M., Ethier, S. D., Dostie, J., & Pelletier, J. (2015) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-015-0215-6 · Cited by 268
The AID enzyme induces class switch recombination in fibroblasts
Okazaki, I., Kinoshita, K., Muramatsu, M., Yoshikawa, K., & Honjo, T. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature727 · Cited by 260
Fattah, F. J., Lee, E. H., Weisensel, N. A., Wang, Y., Lichter, N., & Hendrickson, E. A. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000855 · Cited by 244
Mapping of protein-protein interactions within the DNA-dependent protein kinase complex
Gell, D. A., & Jackson, S. P. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.17.3494 · Cited by 240
Two-Stage Synapsis of DNA Ends during Non-homologous End Joining
Graham, T. G. W., Walter, J. C., & Loparo, J. J. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.010 · Cited by 239
Self-citationThe E3 ligase RNF8 regulates KU80 removal and NHEJ repair
Feng, L., & Chen, J. (2012) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2211 · Cited by 238
Xrcc4 physically links DNA end processing by polynucleotide kinase to DNA ligation by DNA ligase IV
Koch, C. A., Agyei, R., Galicia, S., Metalnikov, P. S., O’Donnell, E., Starostine, A., Weinfeld, M., & Durocher, D. (2004) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600375 · Cited by 237
Feldmann, E., Schmiemann, V., Goedecke, W., Reichenberger, S., & Pfeiffer, P. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.13.2585 · Cited by 235
Jiang, W., Crowe, J. L., Liu, X., Nakajima, S., Wang, Y., Li, C., Lee, B. J., Dubois, R. L., Liu, C., Yu, X., et al. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.024 · Cited by 229
Yoo, S. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.24.4679 · Cited by 228
Human Tdp1 Cleaves a Broad Spectrum of Substrates, Including Phosphoamide Linkages
Interthal, H., Chen, H. J., & Champoux, J. J. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m508898200 · Cited by 227
Lee, J. W., Blanco, L., Zhou, T., García–Díaz, M., Bębenek, K., Kunkel, T. A., Wang, Z., & Povirk, L. F. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m307913200 · Cited by 212
Clements, P. M., Breslin, C., Deeks, E. D., Byrd, P. J., Ju, L., Bieganowski, P., Brenner, C., Moreira, M.-C., Taylor, A. M. R., & Caldecott, K. W. (2004) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.06.017 · Cited by 203
Inamdar, K. V., Pouliot, J. J., Zhou, T., Lees‐Miller, S. P., Rasouli‐Nia, A., & Povirk, L. F. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m204688200 · Cited by 200
Bertocci, B., Smet, A. D., Weill, J., & Reynaud, C. (2006) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2006.04.013 · Cited by 197
The clinical impact of deficiency in DNA non-homologous end-joining
Woodbine, L. J., Gennery, A. R., & Jeggo, P. A. (2014) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.02.011 · Cited by 196
Ku is a 5′-dRP/AP lyase that excises nucleotide damage near broken ends
Roberts, S. A., Strande, N. T., Burkhalter, M. D., Strom, C. N., Havener, J. M., Hasty, P., & Ramsden, D. A. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08926 · Cited by 196
Balmus, G., Pilger, D., Coates, J., Demir, M., Sczaniecka-Clift, M., Barros, A. C., Woods, M., Fu, B., Yang, F., Chen, E. D., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07729-2 · Cited by 195
Cernunnos/XLF promotes the ligation of mismatched and noncohesive DNA ends
Tsai, C. J., Kim, S. A., & Chu, G. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702620104 · Cited by 194
The X family portrait: Structural insights into biological functions of X family polymerases
Moon, A. F., García–Díaz, M., Batra, V. K., Beard, W. A., Bębenek, K., Kunkel, T. A., Wilson, S. H., & Pedersen, L. C. (2007) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.05.009 · Cited by 193
Meek, K., Douglas, P., Cui, X., Ding, Q., & Lees‐Miller, S. P. (2007) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.02366-06 · Cited by 193
The Artemis:DNA-PKcs endonuclease cleaves DNA loops, flaps, and gaps
Ma, Y., Schwarz, K., & Lieber, M. R. (2005) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.04.013 · Cited by 191
DNA-PK as an Emerging Therapeutic Target in Cancer
Mohiuddin, I. S., & Kang, M. H. (2019) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.00635 · Cited by 188
Xing, M., Yang, M., Huo, W., Feng, F., Wei, L., Jiang, W., Ning, S., Yan, Z., Li, W., Wang, Q., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7233 · Cited by 180
Hammel, M., Rey, M., Yu, Y., Mani, R. S., Classen, S., Liu, M., Pique, M. E., Fang, S., Mahaney, B. L., Weinfeld, M., et al. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.272641 · Cited by 179
Reid, D. A., Keegan, S., Leo‐Macías, A., Watanabe, G., Strande, N. T., Chang, H. H., Oksuz, B. A., Fenyö, D., Lieber, M. R., Ramsden, D. A., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1420115112 · Cited by 178
The Role of the Core Non-Homologous End Joining Factors in Carcinogenesis and Cancer
Sishc, B. J., & Davis, A. J. (2017) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers9070081 · Cited by 178
DNA-PKcs structure suggests an allosteric mechanism modulating DNA double-strand break repair
Sibanda, B. L., Chirgadze, D. Y., Ascher, D. B., & Blundell, T. L. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aak9654 · Cited by 177
Ku80 removal from DNA through double strand break–induced ubiquitylation
Postow, L., Ghenoiu, C., Woo, E. M., Krutchinsky, A. N., Chait, B. T., & Funabiki, H. (2008) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200802146 · Cited by 172
A human XRCC4–XLF complex bridges DNA
Andres, S. N., Vergnes, A., Ristić, D., Wyman, C., Modesti, M., & Junop, M. S. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks022 · Cited by 172
Sliding sleeves of XRCC4–XLF bridge DNA and connect fragments of broken DNA
Brouwer, I., Sitters, G., Candelli, A., Heerema, S. J., Heller, I., de Melo, A. J., Zhang, H., Normanno, D., Modesti, M., Peterman, E. J. G., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18643 · Cited by 166
APLF promotes the assembly and activity of non‐homologous end joining protein complexes
Grundy, G. J., Rulten, S. L., Zeng, Z., Arribas-Bosacoma, R., Iles, N., Manley, K., Oliver, A. W., & Caldecott, K. W. (2012) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.304 · Cited by 156
Structural and Functional Interaction between the Human DNA Repair Proteins DNA Ligase IV and XRCC4
Wu, P.-Y., Frit, P., Meesala, S., Dauvillier, S., Modesti, M., Andres, S. N., Huang, Y., Sekiguchi, J., Calsou, P., Salles, B., et al. (2009) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01895-08 · Cited by 155
Ismail, I. H., Gagné, J., Genois, M., Strickfaden, H., McDonald, D., Xu, Z., Poirier, G. G., Masson, J., & Hendzel, M. J. (2015) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3259 · Cited by 155
Ropars, V., Drevet, P., Legrand, P., Baconnais, S., Amram, J., Faure, G., Márquez, J. A., Piétrement, O., Guérois, R., Callebaut, I., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1100758108 · Cited by 153
Kanno, S., Kuzuoka, H., Sasao, S., Hong, Z., Lan, L., Nakajima, S., & Yasui, A. (2007) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601663 · Cited by 153
Crystal Structure of Human XLF: A Twist in Nonhomologous DNA End-Joining
Andres, S. N., Modesti, M., Tsai, C. J., Chu, G., & Junop, M. S. (2007) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.10.024 · Cited by 148
DNA Repair: The Search for Homology
Haber, J. E. (2018) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201700229 · Cited by 147
Nonhomologous end joining: A good solution for bad ends
Waters, C. A., Strande, N. T., Wyatt, D. W., Pryor, J. M., & Ramsden, D. A. (2014) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.02.008 · Cited by 143
Interaction of the Ku heterodimer with the DNA ligase IV/Xrcc4 complex and its regulation by DNA-PK
Costantini, S., Woodbine, L. J., Andreoli, L., Jeggo, P. A., & Vindigni, A. (2007) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.12.007 · Cited by 141
Charity begins at home: non-coding RNA functions in DNA repair
Chowdhury, D., Choi, Y. E., & Brault, M. E. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3523 · Cited by 140
Immunoglobulin κ Light Chain Gene Rearrangement Is Impaired in Mice Deficient for DNA Polymerase Mu
Bertocci, B., Smet, A. D., Berek, C., Weill, J., & Reynaud, C. (2003) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00203-6 · Cited by 140
Neddylation Promotes Ubiquitylation and Release of Ku from DNA-Damage Sites
Brown, J. S., Lukashchuk, N., Sczaniecka-Clift, M., Britton, S., le Sage, C., Calsou, P., Beli, P., Galanty, Y., & Jackson, S. P. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.058 · Cited by 138
Reddy, Y. V. R., Ding, Q., Lees‐Miller, S. P., Meek, K., & Ramsden, D. A. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m406432200 · Cited by 136
Gu, J., Lu, H., Tsai, A. G., Schwarz, K., & Lieber, M. R. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm579 · Cited by 136
Douglas, P., Cui, X., Block, W. D., Yu, Y., Gupta, S., Ding, Q., Ye, R., MORRICE, N. A., Lees‐Miller, S. P., & Meek, K. (2006) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01962-06 · Cited by 127
The role of DNA dependent protein kinase in synapsis of DNA ends
Weterings, E. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg889 · Cited by 125
Processing of DNA for nonhomologous end‐joining by cell‐free extract
Budman, J., & Chu, G. (2005) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600563 · Cited by 121
XLF and APLF bind Ku80 at two remote sites to ensure DNA repair by non-homologous end joining
Nemoz, C., Ropars, V., Frit, P., Gontier, A., Drevet, P., Yu, J., Guérois, R., Pitois, A., Comte, A., Delteil, C., et al. (2018) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-018-0133-6 · Cited by 121
WRN regulates pathway choice between classical and alternative non-homologous end joining
Shamanna, R. A., Lu, H., de Freitas, J. K., Tian, J. Y., Croteau, D. L., & Bohr, V. A. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13785 · Cited by 120
Ruis, B. L., Fattah, K. R., & Hendrickson, E. A. (2008) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00355-08 · Cited by 119
Niewolik, D., Pannicke, U., Lu, H., Ma, Y., Wang, L.-C. V., Kulesza, P., Zandi, E., Lieber, M. R., & Schwarz, K. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m606023200 · Cited by 118
Mahaney, B. L., Hammel, M., Meek, K., Tainer, J. A., & Lees‐Miller, S. P. (2012) · Biochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1139/bcb-2012-0058 · Cited by 117
Li, Y., Chirgadze, D. Y., Bolaños-García, V. M., Sibanda, B. L., Davies, O. R., Ahnesorg, P., Jackson, S. P., & Blundell, T. L. (2007) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601942 · Cited by 116
PAXX Is an Accessory c-NHEJ Factor that Associates with Ku70 and Has Overlapping Functions with XLF
Tadi, S. K., Tellier-Lebègue, C., Nemoz, C., Drevet, P., Audebert, S., Roy, S., Meek, K., Charbonnier, J., & Modesti, M. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.026 · Cited by 115
MRI Is a DNA Damage Response Adaptor during Classical Non-homologous End Joining
Hung, P. J., Johnson, B., Chen, B.-R., Byrum, A. K., Bredemeyer, A. L., Yewdell, W. T., Johnson, T. E., Lee, B. J., Deivasigamani, S., Hindi, I., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.018 · Cited by 113
Ma, Y., Lu, H., Schwarz, K., & Lieber, M. R. (2005) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.4.9.1977 · Cited by 112
YU, Y., Mahaney, B. L., YANO, K., Ye, R., FANG, S., DOUGLAS, P., Chen, D., & Lees‐Miller, S. P. (2008) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.06.015 · Cited by 109
A Mechanism to Minimize Errors during Non-homologous End Joining
Stinson, B. M., Moreno, A., Walter, J. C., & Loparo, J. J. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.11.018 · Cited by 108
Self-citationMechanisms of Overlap Formation in Nonhomologous DNA End Joining
Pfeiffer, P., Thode, S., Hancke, J., & Vielmetter, W. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.2.888 · Cited by 106
MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF V(D)J RECOMBINATION
Gellert, M. F. (1992) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.26.120192.002233 · Cited by 106
Kumar, V., Alt, F. W., & Frock, R. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1611882113 · Cited by 106
A noncatalytic function of the ligation complex during nonhomologous end joining
Jessica, C., Frit, P., Bombarde, O., Salles, B., Négrel, A., Bernard, S., Jeggo, P. A., Lieber, M. R., Modesti, M., & Calsou, P. (2013) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201203128 · Cited by 105
Phosphorylation of Ku dictates DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway choice in S phase
Lee, K. J., Saha, J., Sun, J., Fattah, K. R., Wang, S.-C., Jakob, B., Chi, L., Wang, S., Taucher-Scholz, G., Davis, A. J., et al. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1499 · Cited by 100
Fan, W., & Wu, X. (2004) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.002 · Cited by 97
C-NHEJ without indels is robust and requires synergistic function of distinct XLF domains
Bhargava, R., Sandhu, M., Muk, S., Lee, G., Vaidehi, N., & Stark, J. M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04867-5 · Cited by 97
The essential elements for the noncovalent association of two DNA ends during NHEJ synapsis
Zhao, B., Watanabe, G., Morten, M. J., Reid, D. A., Rothenberg, E., & Lieber, M. R. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11507-z · Cited by 95
DNA-PKcs has KU-dependent function in rRNA processing and haematopoiesis
Shao, Z., Flynn, R. A., Crowe, J. L., Zhu, Y., Liang, J., Jiang, W., Aryan, F., Aoude, P., Bertozzi, C. R., Estes, V. M., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2041-2 · Cited by 95
Pathways and functions of the Werner syndrome protein
Lee, J. W., Harrigan, J. A., Opresko, P. L., & Bohr, V. A. (2004) · Mechanisms of Ageing and Development · doi:10.1016/j.mad.2004.09.011 · Cited by 93
Dissection of DNA double-strand-break repair using novel single-molecule forceps
Wang, J., Duboc, C., Wu, Q., Ochi, T., Liang, S., Tsutakawa, S. E., Lees‐Miller, S. P., Nadal, M., Tainer, J. A., Blundell, T. L., et al. (2018) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-018-0065-1 · Cited by 90
Plugged into the Ku-DNA hub: The NHEJ network
Frit, P., Ropars, V., Modesti, M., Charbonnier, J., & Calsou, P. (2019) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2019.03.001 · Cited by 90
Ribonucleotide incorporation enables repair of chromosome breaks by nonhomologous end joining
Pryor, J. M., Conlin, M. P., Carvajal-Garcia, J., Luedeman, M. E., Luthman, A. J., Small, G. W., & Ramsden, D. A. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat2477 · Cited by 89
Synthetic lethality between PAXX and XLF in mammalian developmentPreprint
Balmus, G., Barros, A. C., Wijnhoven, P. W. G., Lescale, C., Hasse, H. L., Boroviak, K., le Sage, C., Doe, B., Speak, A. O., Galli, A., et al. (2016) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.290510.116 · Cited by 87
Grundy, G. J., Rulten, S. L., Arribas-Bosacoma, R., Davidson, K., Kozik, Z., Oliver, A. W., Pearl, L. H., & Caldecott, K. W. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11242 · Cited by 84
Werner Protein Cooperates with the XRCC4-DNA Ligase IV Complex in End-Processing
Kusumoto, R., Dawut, L., Marchetti, C., Lee, J. W., Vindigni, A., Ramsden, D. A., & Bohr, V. A. (2008) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi702325t · Cited by 81
Ku-Dependent Nonhomologous DNA End Joining in Xenopus Egg Extracts
Labhart, P. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.4.2585 · Cited by 80
The fidelity of the ligation step determines how ends are resolved during nonhomologous end joining
Waters, C. A., Strande, N. T., Pryor, J. M., Strom, C. N., Mieczkowski, P., Burkhalter, M. D., Oh, S., Qaqish, B. F., Moore, D. T., Hendrickson, E. A., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5286 · Cited by 78
Distribution and roles of X-family DNA polymerases in eukaryotes
Uchiyama, Y., Takeuchi, R., Kodera, H., & Sakaguchi, K. (2008) · Biochimie · doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2008.07.005 · Cited by 75
XRCC4's interaction with XLF is required for coding (but not signal) end joining
Roy, S., Andres, S. N., Vergnes, A., Neal, J. A., Xu, Y., Yu, Y., Lees‐Miller, S. P., Junop, M. S., Modesti, M., & Meek, K. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1315 · Cited by 72
Functional significance of the interaction with Ku in DNA double-strand break recognition of XLF
Yano, K.-I., Morotomi‐Yano, K., Lee, K. J., & Chen, D. J. (2011) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.02.020 · Cited by 69
An SCF complex containing Fbxl12 mediates DNA damage-induced Ku80 ubiquitylation
Postow, L., & Funabiki, H. (2013) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.23408 · Cited by 68
Roy, S., de Melo, A. J., Xu, Y., Tadi, S. K., Négrel, A., Hendrickson, E. A., Modesti, M., & Meek, K. (2015) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01503-14 · Cited by 67
Essential role for polymerase specialization in cellular nonhomologous end joining
Pryor, J. M., Waters, C. A., Aza, A., Asagoshi, K., Strom, C. N., Mieczkowski, P. A., Blanco, L., & Ramsden, D. A. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1505805112 · Cited by 67
Ishida, N., Nakagawa, T., Iemura, S.-I., Yasui, A., Shima, H., Katoh, Y., Nagasawa, Y., Natsume, T., Igarashi, K., & Nakayama, K. (2016) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00347-16 · Cited by 66
DNA Ligase IV Guides End-Processing Choice during Nonhomologous End Joining
Conlin, M. P., Reid, D. A., Small, G. W., Chang, H. H., Watanabe, G., Lieber, M. R., Ramsden, D. A., & Rothenberg, E. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.091 · Cited by 64
A single XLF dimer bridges DNA ends during nonhomologous end joining
Graham, T. G. W., Carney, S. M., Walter, J. C., & Loparo, J. J. (2018) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-018-0120-y · Cited by 62
Self-citationAkopiants, K., Zhou, R.-Z., Mohapatra, S., Valerie, K. C., Lees‐Miller, S. P., Lee, K.-J., Chen, D. J., Revy, P., de Villartay, J., & Povirk, L. F. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp283 · Cited by 55
Biochemical Characterization of Metnase’s Endonuclease Activity and Its Role in NHEJ Repair
Beck, B. D., Lee, S.-S., Williamson, E. A., Hromas, R., & Lee, S. (2011) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi200333k · Cited by 54
Rulten, S. L., & Grundy, G. J. (2017) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201600209 · Cited by 50
Suppressing Ku70/Ku80 expression elevates homology-directed repair efficiency in primary fibroblasts
Li, G., Liu, D., Zhang, X., Quan, R., Zhong, C., Mo, J., Huang, Y., Wang, H., Xiao-fang, R. U. A. N., Xu, Z., et al. (2018) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2018.04.011 · Cited by 50
Structural dynamics in DNA damage signaling and repair
Perry, J. J. P., Cotner‐Gohara, E., Ellenberger, T., & Tainer, J. A. (2010) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2010.03.012 · Cited by 49
Structural Insights into the Role of Domain Flexibility in Human DNA Ligase IV
Ochi, T., Wu, Q., Chirgadze, D. Y., Grossmann, J. G., Bolaños-García, V. M., & Blundell, T. L. (2012) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.04.012 · Cited by 49
Li, S., Kanno, S.-I., Watanabe, R., Ogiwara, H., Kohno, T., Watanabe, G., Yasui, A., & Lieber, M. R. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.287797 · Cited by 48
Lee, J. W., Yannone, S. M., Chen, D. J., & Povirk, L. F. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 47
Structural Basis of DNA Ligase IV-Artemis Interaction in Nonhomologous End-Joining
Ioannes, P. D., Malu, S., Cortés, P., & Aggarwal, A. K. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.11.004 · Cited by 47
Reid, D. A., Conlin, M. P., Yin, Y., Chang, H. H., Watanabe, G., Lieber, M. R., Ramsden, D. A., & Rothenberg, E. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1221 · Cited by 46
Normanno, D., Négrel, A., de Melo, A. J., Betzi, S., Meek, K., & Modesti, M. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.22900 · Cited by 38
PAXX and its paralogs synergistically direct DNA polymerase λ activity in DNA repair
Craxton, A., Munnur, D., Jukes‐Jones, R., Skalka, G., Langlais, C., Cain, K., & Malewicz, M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06127-y · Cited by 36
XLF acts as a flexible connector during non-homologous end joining
Carney, S. M., Moreno, A., Piatt, S. C., Cisneros‐Aguirre, M., Lopezcolorado, F. W., Stark, J. M., & Loparo, J. J. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.61920 · Cited by 32
Self-citationRepair of chromosomal double-strand breaks by precise ligation in human cells
Lin, W. Y., Wilson, J. H., & Lin, Y. (2013) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.04.024 · Cited by 30
Kawale, A. S., Akopiants, K., Valerie, K. C., Ruis, B. L., Hendrickson, E. A., Huang, S.-Y. N., Pommier, Y. G., & Povirk, L. F. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky694 · Cited by 28
Tellier, M., & Chalmers, R. (2019) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.06.006 · Cited by 22
Ligand binding characteristics of the Ku80 von Willebrand domain
Kim, K., Min, J., Kirby, T. W., Gabel, S. A., Pedersen, L. C., & London, R. E. (2019) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102739 · Cited by 22
Topoisomerase I and Genome Stability: The Good and the Bad
Cho, J.-E., & Jinks-Robertson, S. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7459-7_2 · Cited by 21
Xing, M., Bjørås, M., Daniel, J. A., Alt, F. W., & Oksenych, V. (2017) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.07.008 · Cited by 21
Resolution of complex ends by Nonhomologous end joining - better to be lucky than good?
Strande, N. T., Waters, C. A., & Ramsden, D. A. (2012) · Genome Integrity · doi:10.1186/2041-9414-3-10 · Cited by 15
Two‐way crosstalk between BER and c‐NHEJ repair pathway is mediated by Pol‐β and Ku70
Wen, X., Ci, S., Li, M., Wang, M., Dianov, G. L., Ma, Z., Li, L., Hua, K. Q., Alagamuthu, K. K., Qing, L., et al. (2019) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.201900308r · Cited by 14
The human DNA ends proteome uncovers an unexpected entanglement of functional pathways
Berthelot, V., Cardoso, G. M., Hégarat, N., Guillonneau, F., François, J., Giovannangeli, C., Praseuth, D., & Rusconi, F. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw121 · Cited by 11
Stavridi, A. K., Appleby, R. E., Liang, S., Blundell, T. L., & Chaplin, A. K. (2020) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20190092 · Cited by 10
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair
Nambiar, T. S., Baudrier, L., Billon, P., & Ciccia, A. (2022) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.12.026 · Cited by 227
Annual review of PROTAC degraders as anticancer agents in 2022
Wang, X., Qin, Z.-L., Li, N., Jia, M.-Q., Liu, Q.-G., Bai, Y., Song, J., Yuan, S., & Zhang, S. (2024) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116166 · Cited by 107
Gene therapy for CNS disorders: modalities, delivery and translational challenges
Gao, J., Gunasekar, S., Xia, Z. J., Shalin, K., Jiang, C., Chen, H., Lee, D., Lee, S., Pisal, N. D., Luo, J. N., et al. (2024) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-024-00829-7 · Cited by 100
Recent advances in CRISPR-Cas9-based genome insertion technologies
Chen, X., Du, J., Yun, S., Xue, C., Yao, Y., & Rao, S. (2024) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102138 · Cited by 71
Combining targeted DNA repair inhibition and immune-oncology approaches for enhanced tumor control
Concannon, K., Morris, B. B., Gay, C. M., & Byers, L. A. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.12.031 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Stinson, B. M., & Loparo, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Loparo, Joseph J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2021-06-20
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 137-164
- ISSN
- 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4509
- PMC
- PMC8899865
- OpenAlex
- W3127347270
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 173
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM115487)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Keywords
- non-homologous end joining, DNA double-strand breaks, DNA end processing, genome stability, chromosomal translocation, DNA ligation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Enzymes, Humans, Models, Biological, Genomic Instability, Multiprotein Complexes, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, DNA End-Joining Repair, V(D)J Recombination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review