The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Does Globalization Fuel Populism? Economics, Culture, and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism
Abstract
There is compelling evidence that globalization shocks, often working through culture and identity, have played an important role in driving up support for populist movements, particularly of the right-wing kind. I start with an empirical analysis of the 2016 presidential election in the United States to show that globalization-related attitudinal variables were important correlates of the switch to Trump. I then provide a conceptual framework that identifies four distinct channels through which globalization can stimulate populism, two each on the demand and supply sides of politics. I evaluate the empirical literature with the help of this framework, discussing trade, financial globalization, and immigration separately. I conclude the review by discussing some apparently anomalous cases in which populists have been against, rather than in favor of, trade protection.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The ascendance of populism is a complex process, but there is agreement about its close connection to globalization (Rodrik, 2021).”
From The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Rodrik, 2021
Citations
Cites
Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G., & Majlesi, K. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20170011 · Cited by 1,063
The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism
Algan, Y., Guriev, S., Papaioannou, E., & Passari, E. (2017) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.1353/eca.2017.0015 · Cited by 693
Looking for Local Labor Market Effects of NAFTA
Hakobyan, S., & McLaren, J. (2016) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00587 · Cited by 284
Costly Jobs: Trade-related Layoffs, Government Compensation, and Voting in U.S. Elections
MARGALIT, Y. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305541000050x · Cited by 273
The Political Economy of Ideas: On Ideas Versus Interests in Policymaking
Mukand, S., & Rodrik, D. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24467 · Cited by 63
Self-citationPopulists at the Polls: Economic Factors in the 1896 Presidential Election
Eichengreen, B., Haines, M., Jaremski, M., & Leblang, D. (2017) · doi:10.3386/w23932 · Cited by 9
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 83
- 10.1111/ajps.12503 · DOI
- book, 2019, User's guide and codebook for the ANES 2016 Time Series study
- Anelli M, 2019, We were the robots: automation and voting behavior in Western Europe
- 10.1257/aer.103.6.2121 · DOI · Paper page
- Ballard-Rosa C, 2018, Economic decline, social identity, and authoritarian values in the United States
- 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.03.002 · DOI
- Barone G, 2019, Low-wage import competition and populist backlash: the case of Italy
- Becker SO, 2017, Did Eastern European immigration cause an increase in anti-European sentiment in the UK?
- 10.1093/epolic/eix012 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11127-020-00857-8 · DOI
- Bornschier S., 2018, The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, 212
- Bossert W, 2019, Economic insecurity and the rise of the right
- Broz JL, 2019, Populism in place: the economic geography of the globalization backlash
- 10.1111/kykl.12161 · DOI
- 10.1111/jors.12503 · DOI
- Cerrato A, 2018, Why does import competition favor Republicans?
- 10.3386/w22178 · DOI · Paper page
- Chen S., 2018, Unemployment, immigration, and populism: evidence from two quasi-natural experiments in the United States
- Choi J, 2020, Local employment and political effects of trade deals: evidence from NAFTA
- 10.1017/S0003055417000685 · DOI
- Colantone I, 2018, The economic determinants of the “cultural backlash”: globalization and attitudes in Western Europe
- 10.1111/ajps.12358 · DOI
- Dal Bó E, 2019, Economic losers and political winners: Sweden's radical right
- 10.1017/S0022050713000302 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/ej/ueaa006 · DOI
- 10.1017/pan.2018.48 · DOI
- Dippel C, 2018, Instrumental variables and causal mechanisms: unpacking the effect of trade on workers and voters
- Doerr S, 2020, From finance to fascism
- 10.1093/restud/rdy047 · DOI
- book, 2016, The Economy After Brexit
- 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781108354943 · DOI · Paper page
- Erickson J, 2014, The middle-class squeeze: a picture of stagnant incomes, rising costs, and what we can do to strengthen America's middle class
- book, 2017, Income inequalities and employment patterns in Europe before and after the Great Recession
- 10.1257/aer.20181164 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.03.006 · DOI
- Gerdes C, 2010, The impact of immigration on election outcomes in Danish municipalities
- Gidron N, 2017, Br. J. Sociol., 68, S57
- 10.1177/1354068817718949 · DOI
- 10.1093/restud/rdaa031 · DOI
- Guiso L, 2018, Populism: demand and supply
- Guriev S, 2020, The political economy of populism
- Gyöngyösi G, 2020, Financial crisis, creditor-debtor conflict, and populism
- Hacker JS, 2020, Let Them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality
- 10.1093/jeea/jvx003 · DOI
- 10.1111/sjoe.12239 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1909202116 · DOI
- 10.1080/01402382.2016.1181871 · DOI
- Hochschild AR., 2016, Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right
- 10.1007/s11109-019-09567-4 · DOI
- 10.1177/2053168018822395 · DOI
- Inglehart R, 2016, Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: economic have-nots and cultural backlash
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226399010.001.0001 · DOI
- Iversen T, 2017, Transition to the knowledge economy and the rise of populism: a human capital perspective
- 10.1017/S0020818317000194 · DOI
- Kuk J., 2019, The effects of economic distress on racial attitudes
- 10.1177/0010414020912283 · DOI
- Malgouyres C., 2017, Trade shocks and far-right voting: evidence from French presidential elections
- 10.1257/jep.33.4.152 · DOI
- Mayda AM, 2019, Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ.
- 10.1080/0023656042000217246 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00148-013-0471-y · DOI
- 10.1257/mac.6.2.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3386/w25077 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.labeco.2019.101765 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-063806 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781108595841 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.01.004 · DOI
- 10.2307/41165897 · DOI
- Rodrik D., 2011, The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy
- 10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4 · DOI
- 10.1177/0010414017710264 · DOI
- Rothwell JT, 2016, Explaining nationalist political views: the case of Donald Trump
- 10.1007/s00168-020-00996-2 · DOI
- Schwartz C, 2020, Br. J. Political Sci
- 10.2307/j.ctvc77mmb · DOI · Paper page
- Steiner ND, 2020, Local trade shocks and the nationalist backlash in political attitudes: panel data evidence from Great Britain
- Strain MR, 2019, Economic shocks and clinging
- 10.1093/soceco/1.2.215 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/restud/rdz027 · DOI
- Vertier P, 2019, Dismantling the “jungle”: migrant relocation and extreme voting in France
- Wilkinson W., 2019, The density divide: urbanization, polarization, and populist backlash
- 10.1080/13501763.2019.1678055 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding
Yesilkagit, K., Bauer, M., Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2024) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13808 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodrik, D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rodrik, Dani
- ORCID
- Rodrik, Dani
- Venue
- Annual Review of Economics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2021-08-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-170
- ISSN
- 1941-1383 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-1391
- OpenAlex
- W3128246896
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 10
- FWCI
- 33.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Economics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Keywords
- globalization, right-wing populism, populism, 2016 US presidential election, Donald Trump, trade, financial globalization, immigration, cultural change, identity, protectionism, political economy of globalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review