CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 554Team Dynamics and PerformanceOrganizational Learning and LeadershipJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological Safety Comes of Age: Observed Themes in an Established Literature

Open access
Edmondson, Amy C., Bransby, Derrick P.·2023·Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
DOI 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Since its renaissance in the 1990s, psychological safety research has flourished—a boom motivated by recognition of the challenge of navigating uncertainty and change. Today, its theoretical and practical significance is amplified by the increasingly complex and interdependent nature of the work in organizations. Conceptual and empirical research on psychological safety—a state of reduced interpersonal risk—is thus timely, relevant, and extensive. In this article, we review contemporary psychological safety research by describing its various content areas, assessing what has been learned in recent years, and suggesting directions for future research. We identify four dominant themes relating to psychological safety: getting things done, learning behaviors, improving the work experience, and leadership. Overall, psychological safety plays important roles in enabling organizations to learn and perform in dynamic environments, becoming particularly relevant in a world altered by a global pandemic.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 114 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Lyman B, 2020, J. Nurs. Manag., 28, 1241
  2. Newman A, 2017, Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev., 27, 521
  3. Ortega A, 2014, J. Bus. Psychol., 29, 311
  4. Sanner B, 2015, Organ. Psychol. Rev., 5, 224
  5. Schein EH., 1993, MIT Sloan Management Review Magazine

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 551

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Edmondson, A. C., & Bransby, D. P.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
ORCID
Edmondson, Amy C.
Venue
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2023-01-23
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
55-78
ISSN
  • 2327-0608 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-0616
DOI
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217
OpenAlex
W4308945923
Semantic Scholar
c0c3c46e3f6efbca6c20e59d9c1d90531eb37f0a
Cited by
554
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 279 · 2025: 159 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 30
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
psychological safety, organizational learning, learning behavior, leadership, work experience, organizational performance, uncertainty, change, COVID-19 pandemic, interpersonal risk, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review