Cited by 398Social and Cultural DynamicsSocial and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status Dynamics

Social Class as Culture: The Convergence of Resources and Rank in the Social Realm

Kraus, Michael W., Piff, Paul K., Keltner, Dacher·2011·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Social class reflects more than the material conditions of people’s lives. Objective resources (e.g., income) shape cultural practices and behaviors that signal social class. These signals create cultural identities among upper- and lower-class individuals—identities that are rooted in subjective perceptions of social-class rank vis-à-vis others. Empirical studies find that perceptions of social-class rank influence patterns of contextual versus dispositional cognition and other- versus self-oriented affect and behavior that are consistent with objective resource-based measures of social class. Our theoretical conceptualization emphasizes the utility of measuring and manipulating perceptions of social-class rank to better understand how social class influences thought and action across diverse social domains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721411414654

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in material resources available to working- and middle-class people create cultural identities based on subjective perceptions of social rank in relation to others.

    “The latter authors argue that the differences in material resources available to working‐ and middle‐class people create cultural identities that are based on subjective perceptions of social rank in relation to others.”

    From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Kraus, Piff, and Keltner (2011)

  • Perceptions of social rank are based on distinctive patterns of observable behaviour arising from differences in wealth, education, and occupation.

    “These perceptions are based on distinctive patterns of observable behaviour arising from differences in wealth, education, and occupation.”

    From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Kraus, Piff, and Keltner (2011)

  • Subjective social rank exerts broad influences on thought, emotion, and social behavior independently of the substance of objective social class.

    “subjective social rank ‘exerts broad influences on thought, emotion, and social behavior independently of the substance of objective social class’”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2011-08
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
246-250
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2135699994
Cited by
398
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
FWCI
57.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
social class, cultural identity, cultural practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review